Started By
Message

re: nevermind

Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:16 pm to
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27486 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

tried to do 3???3 on excel and it told me to frick off


Given that the limits of excel are now like 2000000000x2000000000...thats pretty impressive.

I'm about to try it in Access.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16185 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:17 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 11:26 pm
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16185 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:18 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 11:26 pm
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67593 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

smoking those newports


you are black?
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13613 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:24 pm to
That's some heady shite.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27486 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:29 pm to
Even with an infinite lifespan, and infinite memory, the universe would end before you reached the end of counting... Much less memorizing.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77414 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Even with an infinite lifespan, and infinite memory, the universe would end before you reached the end of counting



I don't think you understand what infinite means.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27486 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

I don't think you understand what infinite means.



And the O in your name has made you confuse an infinite lifespan with immortality.

The next big bang would certainly end your life.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77414 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:46 pm to
infinite is infinite.

Posted by Grim
Member since Dec 2013
12302 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

And the O in your name has made you confuse an infinite lifespan with immortality. 

The next big bang would certainly end your life.


Then it wouldn't be an infinite lifespan
Posted by TheAlmightySmash
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2014
5480 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:53 pm to
Numberphiles is a great web series
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77414 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 3:54 pm to
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16185 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:10 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 11:26 pm
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16185 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:11 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 11:26 pm
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27486 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

it would be beyond the limit provided by the Bekenstein bound


I was under the impression that this only applied to mechanical or electronic methods of storage?

In all seriousness though, I get that the resulting number is so large that it is one of the closest approximations of infinity that has been used, but... the universe is seemingly infinite. Which makes the number in question significantly less than even 0% of 0% of 0% of infinity. So while it is large, it is finite.

While mechanical and electronic storage are bound by the whole turing machine thing... What are the limits of biologic memory? Idk. But it seems like it is very close to a pure expression of information contained in energy. I can admit to being wrong earlier. But where's the proof?

Posted by Ole War Skule
North Shore
Member since Sep 2003
3409 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 7:25 pm to
By far the best thread in 3 weeks. No trump, Muslims, CLM/aleva, sjw/blm, or rex.



Thanks!
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
114047 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 7:26 pm to
Your threads are becoming a black hole.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram