Started By
Message

re: Need an OT rating on Dakota Fanning

Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:18 am to
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27329 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:18 am to
quote:

She looks like a vampire. With cankles.


Cankles?

That's a killer. Can't deal with no cankles.

ETA-pics I saw didn't look like cankles. She's still on my hit list.
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 11:20 am
Posted by poncho villa
DALLAS
Member since Jul 2010
17698 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:19 am to
Wood drink bath water
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20507 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:20 am to
quote:

She gets rated on a scale of one to ten. Based on a complicated, intricate, scientific set of criteria. It is not based on world population.



Then what population is it based on?

quote:

I'm sure you're just trying to justify your own ugliness



Why would my looks have anything to do with this?

Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:22 am to
quote:

How does it work then?

Its a rating scale, like diamonds

Just because a diamond is rated as Very Slightly Included, it doesn't mean half the diamonds in the world are better, and the other half worse. It simply means that there are enough flaws in that particular diamond for it not be Very Very Slightly Included, Internally Flawed, or Flawless

Only about 20% of all diamonds mined have a clarity rating high enough for the diamond to be considered appropriate for use as a gemstone; the other 80% are relegated to industrial use.

Meaning 80% of the population would be an OT 5 or less
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30091 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:23 am to
OT 3
IRL 6

Eminently average
Posted by Vegas Eddie
The Quad
Member since Dec 2013
5976 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Breesus





Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27329 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Only about 20% of all diamonds mined have a clarity rating high enough for the diamond to be considered appropriate for use as a gemstone; the other 80% are relegated to industrial use. Meaning 80% of the population would be an OT 5 or less


Ahhhh...good explanation.
Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24561 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:26 am to
Shes no Kate Upton but she's cute. Pretty eyes. I give her a unique 6.5 in real life.
Posted by sharkfhin
Over der
Member since Sep 2008
2339 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:26 am to
Marriage material....irl 7.3
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 11:28 am
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20507 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Only about 20% of all diamonds mined have a clarity rating high enough for the diamond to be considered appropriate for use as a gemstone; the other 80% are relegated to industrial use.

Meaning 80% of the population would be an OT 5 or less


So really the scale only exists from 5 to 10??

What does an OT 3 mean?
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Then what population is it based on?


It's not based on on a population. Do you have a reading comprehension issue?

Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24561 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:29 am to
quote:

I'm sure you're just trying to justify your own ugliness


Well that's just mean spirited. urintrouble is probs hotter than any girl you've ever been with.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20507 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Well that's just mean spirited. urintrouble is probs hotter than any girl you've ever been with.



I'm not a girl.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:29 am to
quote:

So really the scale only exists from 5 to 10?? 


No

quote:

What does an OT 3 mean?


As ugly/fat as Kate Upton
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:29 am to
I would, and I would brag about it but feel bad later for the whole thing.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136799 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I'm not a girl.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20507 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

It's not based on on a population.


How can a rating scale/system not have a population?

quote:

Do you have a reading comprehension issue?


frick you dude.



Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:33 am to
quote:

What does an OT 3 mean?

IMO, an OT 5 is that hometown girl that has cute features, but her personality is what really makes her sexy

So an OT 3 would be that girl with less cute features, or without the personality
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:35 am to
quote:

How can a rating scale/system not have a population? 



As explained earlier there is set of criteria defining the perfect 10. each individual is placed in the scale in comparison to that 10.

Do you have statistic and math comprehension issues?

Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20507 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:35 am to
quote:

IMO, an OT 5 is that hometown girl that has cute features, but her personality is what really makes her sexy

So an OT 3 would be that girl with less cute features, or without the personality



What about this woman? Rate her.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram