re: Mass shooting on Vegas Strip discussion

I don't care what that article says. You can go listen to the audio for yourself, they waited on SWAT to breach the room because:

A) they didn't know what was inside the room. In their minds, there could be hostages or a bomb in the room.

B) They knew the body armor they wore for standard patrols could not handle the firepower Paddock was using. With civilians no longer in immediate danger, there was no longer a need for officers to take the risk to storm the room without proper protection.

They even explicitly said they were waiting on SWAT because Paddock had ceased firing on the crowd.

Also,

quote:

---

There was one SWAT guy on the Ad Hoc team with a breaching charge

---

If he only had 1 charge, then how did they manage to breach the second room?

Because according to everyone involved, officers breached it with a charge shortly after they entered and secured the main room. Not enough extra time for SWAT to randomly show up if they weren't there before.

The two singular shots or of a small caliber gun different than what was being shot into the crowd. So did he shoot himself twice in the head?

quote:

---

Do you have any other reference than the radio saying that a SWAT "TEAM" breached and cleared the room?

---

Sheriff Lombardo stated it was the SWAT team that breached the room.

He also stated the reason they waited an hour was specifically to let SWAT arrive and get set up so they could breach the room safely, and that they had the luxury of doing so because Paddock had stopped firing at the crowd.

You missed a possible option.

Option 3) the SWAT team led the breach, and were the first ones in the room, but the officers from the Ad Hoc team were also part of the breach team. The officers who interviewed with CBS were not the only 4 who breached the room. There were others with them.




Lastly, and I think this will be a big fricking deal in the long run, the officers' statements in the CBS interview regarding the note on the table, which everyone saw in the leaked pictures, have already been changed in the official narrative.

At the evening presser on Wednesday Oct 6th, 3 days after the shooting, Sheriff Lombardo stated there was a note, but he didn't know the contents.

The next night, at the evening presser on Thursday Oct 7th, Sheriff Lombardo stated the note contained numbers, and they were still researching what those numbers meant.

Then, 60 Minutes aired on the evening of Sunday Oct 10th, and the officers also stated the note contained numbers. However, they added that they read the note right after breaching the room. They also claim to have immediately recognized the note's contents as calculations for distance, velocity, and bullet drop, for various parts of the fair grounds. They claimed to have RECOGNIZED WHAT THE NUMBERS WERE THE SECOND THEY LAID EYES ON THE NOTE, LESS THAN 10 MINUTES AFTER BREACHING THE ROOM.

The very next night after 60 Minutes, at the Monday Oct 11th presser, Sheriff Lombardo was asked to clarify what the numbers on the note were. His reply was, "I AM NOT AT LIBERTY TO DISCUSS THAT".

So 3 days before 60 Minutes airs, the Sheriff states they are still researching what the numbers on the note mean. Then the officers on 60 Minutes claim to have recognized what the number meant the very second they laid eyes on the note. If the officers knew instantly, why was the FBI and LVMPD still researching the numbers 5 days later? And then everything is compounded by the Sheriff essentially retracting the information of what was on the note, and now telling us they can't talk about it at all.

This is only 1 of about 10 things they've completely altered, back tracked, side tracked, walked back, turned upside down....etc. Yes, Sheriff Lombardo warned us some details would change, but this many details should never change in an investigation. This whole thing reeks of uncooked shrimp left in a car in death valley for 12 days

So basically, who knows if all of the information they gave was correct.

Knowing the FBI, it's not impossible that the men in the interview might not have been the actual officers from the breach team. But were FBI guys who they trusted, because they didn't want a local officer accidentally giving out any information outside of the official narrative.

In all probability, that was the officers from the breach team.

Because the official narrative is more confusing than a king gender queer cuck queen who identifies as a pine cone.

Edit: I rephrased the final paragraph. Because while I don't trust the FBI in any way, form, or fashion. The FBI sending federal agents to play LVMPD officers in an interview is way too nuts for me. However, I don't believe it is outside the realm of what is possible.

To the silent down votes, how about you actually engage me in conversation, instead of sitting back and down voting what you don't agree with.

Because outside of the somewhat ludicrous idea that the FBI sent actors to the 60 Minutes interview. Everything I said is 100% accurate. The changes I listed are the exact changes to the official narrative and official information, and the timing of the changes are 100% accurate as well.

quote:

---

My take is that Paddock was paid in advance to do "this" whatever "this" is. That explains his ridiculous video power earnings in the prior years.

---

The is zero evidence he every netted a dime playing video poker, there is documented evidence he made considerable money from a real estate transaction.

The sad thing is 99% of Americans don't give a sh$t what really happened with that shooting. As others have said, the whole story stinks to high heaven.

quote:

---

How big a check did LVPD cut you to spin their narrative??

---

The frick? Have you even read my posts? I've mentioned the current narrative not fitting the events, the past narrative, or videos/leaked pics on numerous occasions. Even in the last 1.5 pages.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist like many in this thread. I don't believe the government planned and executed this. Simply because I've seen how our government works, they could never pull something of this scale off without something going wrong and people finding out.

However, I am most certainly not one of the people who believe every word the police say. The official narrative, and everything about this investigation so far, reeks. They've changed too many details, altered too many timelines, back tracked on too much information, and side stepped too many direct questions.

All of that being said, my timeline write-up still works, even if he didn't fire 200 rounds at the officers. Because they still waited for SWAT to arrive. Paddock still(probably) tried to pack up some of his guns and ammo to escape, accidentally shot himself, and then killed himself.

So, they haven't paid me a dime.

I'm directly in the middle between the crazies and the ones who can't think for themselves. I don't believe the correct official narrative for a large portion of the timeline. But there was NOT a second shooter. Not in a helicopter and not in a plane, nor on the ground or in a different hotel.

This whole thing is a shite show.

Edit: In addition to the fact I am not a LVMPD shill. I've been pushing a narrative no one else on this board has. One that's very contrary to the current official narrative. Namely, I believe Paddock accidentally shot himself in the lower right abdomen, while attempting to gather some of his guns so he could scape, and then committed suicide because he assayed the wound and ascertained that escape was no longer feasible. The cops haven't even acknowledged Paddock had a second gunshot wound yet.

quote:

---

Maybe, but I heard the Sheriff say this live in either his 1st or 2nd interview

---

Say what, that Campos interrupted the shooting?

Because if so, you did hear the sheriff say this. But they have changed the narrative multiple times since then.

Now the story is that Campos found Paddock and got shot BEFORE Paddock started firing on the crowd.

quote:

---

Say what, that Campos interrupted the shooting?

Because if so, you did hear the sheriff say this. But they have changed the narrative multiple times since then.

Now the story is that Campos found Paddock and got shot BEFORE Paddock started firing on the crowd.

---

I know they changed the story but I guarantee you I heard the sheriff talk about Campos saving lives. He made it sound like no more shots were fired after he interrupted Paddock. A reporter was talking about the Union giving their own credit and then the Sheriff went on to praise Campos in the way I described.

This is interesting

Here is a pic supposedly of Campos getting his award on Oct 10th.That photo was taken at Jean Georges Steakhouse at the Aria. Notice the texture on the walls. The LCD Panel in the back. The chandelier


Here is the same room in 2013


This is why we ask questions. The steakhouse was totally redesigned in July of this year and now looks like this.


Story about the remodel