- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana Loses Its Boot
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:35 am to Zephyrius
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:35 am to Zephyrius
quote:and i hope you have a couple 100 billion to do this.
Blow the levees south of Belle Chase but levee the communities themselves ie Port Sulphur and Venice. Connect them with a causeway for transportation.
Then over the next 10yrs move the port of New Orleans along lake pontchartrain in New Orleans East. Moving the port actually makes more sense economically as its a more direct shot to the gulf from the Lake via Chef, Lake Borgne, and Miss. Sound.
That's all I got...
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:41 am to WeeWee
quote:I like how you just assume they know what they are doing because they are dutch.
I would rather hire the dutch and get the job done right
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:42 am to ksayetiger
quote:
do you have numbers on that metric tonnage of silt today versus "back then"?
In 1850 there was 11 billionty shittons of silt; today there is less.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:54 am to jrodLSUke
Im so confused by humans classifying scientific and geological events as "sad". Some volcano erupts, "how tragic, look at all the destruction." Louisiana erodes "how sad, what a loss." The surface of the Earth is everchanging. There is no boot shaped place where we call Louisiana. We drew lines and made it a boot. How tragic it must have been when Pangaea broke apart...
Posted on 9/9/14 at 11:22 am to CarRamrod
quote:
I like how you just assume they know what they are doing because they are dutch.
watch the build it bigger episode on the port of rotterdam and floating city, then do some research and get back to me
Posted on 9/9/14 at 11:59 am to dafuqusay
quote:
Forgive my ignorance but can you explain why blowing the levees will reverse the erosion. Is it bc of all the sediment that will flow into eroded areas and eventually build itself back up?
No one is seriously talking about just blowing up the levees, let's get that out there first and foremost.
The problem is that the Louisiana coast has been built mainly by sediment dumping from the Mississippi River as it flows out through the marshes. The levee system has corralled that recharge and sent it straight out to the Gulf so the coastline is not only not getting new sediment to expand with, it's not getting enough to replace what's already there when it erodes out.
On top of that, there's also the issue with salt-water intrusion from the Gulf that kills fresh water habitats. Without the levee systems in place, these marshes would have been recharged and the salt either pushed back out or buried, thus rejuvenating the fresh-water habitat once again. With the levee system in place the habitats have to depend on normal rainfall and human intervention, neither of which are nearly as effective.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 9/9/14 at 12:04 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Do you have to remove all the levees or could you just cut strategic holes and dig channels to areas that you want to rebuild?
I think what needs to happen is a drastic re-thinking of the levee system from Alexandria southward. Instead of walling up the river, the better option might be to wall up the towns and have more raised roadways. This would be very expensive, but not nearly as expensive as losing almost everything below I-10 over the course of the next 100 or so years.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 12:07 pm to Bard
Just pump the sediment that is currently dredged and dumped off the continental shelf in to the wetlands and watch them flourish. The grass will take over, it's grass in south LA for goodness sake it will grow.
They have to dredge the Mississippi river passes constantly to allow ships to pass and waste that sediment all day every day. Let's start here, it isn't rocket science.
They have to dredge the Mississippi river passes constantly to allow ships to pass and waste that sediment all day every day. Let's start here, it isn't rocket science.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:11 pm to tgrgrd00
quote:
Just pump the sediment that is currently dredged and dumped off the continental shelf in to the wetlands and watch them flourish. The grass will take over, it's grass in south LA for goodness sake it will grow.
They have to dredge the Mississippi river passes constantly to allow ships to pass and waste that sediment all day every day. Let's start here, it isn't rocket science.
and rebuild the barrier islands to slow down the errosion of current wetlands and help protect from hurricanes
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:13 pm to When in Rome
But it isnt water.
good god. subsidence is an issue, but this is just bullshite.
good god. subsidence is an issue, but this is just bullshite.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:13 pm to WeeWee
quote:
and rebuild the barrier islands to slow down the errosion of current wetlands and help protect from hurricanes
stupid idea
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:15 pm to tgrgrd00
quote:
Just pump the sediment that is currently dredged and dumped off the continental shelf in to the wetlands and watch them flourish.
doesnt work like that due to particle settling size in the physical environment.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:16 pm to WeeWee
quote:trust me i know more than you about this subject.
watch the build it bigger episode on the port of rotterdam and floating city, then do some research and get back to me
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:18 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
trust me i know more than you about this subject.
probably but if you are wanting the US corp of engineers to do it, it makes me wonder
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:20 pm to When in Rome
People were making this argument back in the 80's fwiw.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:33 pm to ScottieP
quote:
f this was done in the NOLA area it would totally change the saltwater fishers in the area. Thus the push back from commercial and residential fishermen will be hugh.
It's unbelievable how much of this discussion is dominated by guys who don't want to spend an extra $20 on gas to find specks.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:36 pm to CptBengal
I love the responses these guys are giving..... It is "so simple".
First this dredging of the mississippi, do you know how much money it takes to move this to other locations? I do and it is not pretty.
Second, where are you going to put it, and who decides where. What if the best place isnt owned by the state? Or you cant get the area permitted for this type of construction.
First this dredging of the mississippi, do you know how much money it takes to move this to other locations? I do and it is not pretty.
Second, where are you going to put it, and who decides where. What if the best place isnt owned by the state? Or you cant get the area permitted for this type of construction.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:37 pm to WeeWee
quote:where did i say that? 2nd if you want it done soon they might be one of the only government entities that could push something of this scale through local, state, and federal government.
probably but if you are wanting the US corp of engineers to do it, it makes me wonder
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:38 pm to Cold Cous Cous
quote:the same salt water that is killing the marsh grass is the same water that has brought the specs reds and oysters this far inland.
It's unbelievable how much of this discussion is dominated by guys who don't want to spend an extra $20 on gas to find specks.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:51 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
econd, where are you going to put it, and who decides where. What if the best place isnt owned by the state? Or you cant get the area permitted for this type of construction.
a couple of years ago we bought into a hunting club on the unproctected side of the ms river and in one of the papers there is a clause that the COE can do whatever they want with that land as long as they compensate us, so I am sure it is that way up and down the river.
As far as the money goes the La costal masterplan in 2012 cost a billion dollars a year. Our fed govment flushes more than that down the toilet each year
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News