- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:39 pm to lsupride87
You need to actually read.
It says the city will have negotiations to see which side actually owns the statue.
It says the city will have negotiations to see which side actually owns the statue.
quote:
goes on to say that the city and City Park will “engage in good-faith negotiations to attempt to resolve their competing claims” over who owns the monument for a period of 30 days.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:39 pm to lsupride87
So why a 30 day delay?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:40 pm to lsupride87
Negotiations? I thought there was a legal ruling to allow removal to proceed. So what is there to negotiate?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:41 pm to jlc05
quote:It says it right in the article. You need to read.
So why a 30 day delay?
It says to have negotiations on their competing claims as to who actually owns the staute.
They city has yet to say they dont own it.
Admit you fricked up.
And what was shown to Reese at the time also did not prove to him the City didnt own it. He had no legal standing to do anything but dismiss
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:41 pm to lsupride87
quote:
quote: They just fricking admitted it Link?
You didn't expect them to explictly admit it, did you? If there wasn't a problem, there wouldn't be a delay.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:42 pm to jlc05
quote:Are you an idiot?
So what is there to negotiate?
What if the City Park Assoc does prove in the future that they do own the statue? Could you imagine that shitstorm?
It is a cover your arse for the future, and the present in terms of good-faith negotiations.
You were wrong, just admit it
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:43 pm to lsupride87
So why not just take it down now? No problem, right?
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:44 pm to lsupride87
judge fricked up
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:44 pm to jlc05
quote:You are useless. There is no need to converse
So why not just take it dien niw?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:44 pm to TigerinPurgatory
quote:Explain
judge fricked up
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:44 pm to lsupride87
Admit that you dont know shite
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:45 pm to jlc05
quote:You were proven wrong you moron
Admit that you dont know shite
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:46 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You are useless. There is no need to converse
You sound like an internet tough guy. We should meet to discuss it.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:47 pm to lsupride87
You haven't proven anything
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:48 pm to jlc05
quote:You said the city admitted they didnt own the statue. That is patently false, and I proved you wrong
You haven't proven anything
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:48 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The judge is a very respected, CONSERVATIVE, law abiding judge.
Kern Reese is a conservative? Lord, I've heard it all now.
He's a democrat with a background as a tort attorney.
He is completely against any modernization of civil district court.
His ruling was not based on any evidence but simply, "this has gone on too long".
He made that ruling on a Wed, and 2 days later, the city admits there is an issue? Come on.
I'm not saying he should have ruled in favor of blocking it. But at the very least, he should have issued a TRO until this could get worked out.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:49 pm to lsupride87
They basically did with the 30 day delay. If there was no problem, then no delay.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:49 pm to lsupride87
quote:
explain
judge did not ask city if they had received permission to remove statue from park commission! He "assumed " they did!
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:50 pm to jlc05
You all want to bring shite up that was not before the court. I'm anti-removal like most in the city.
Given the pleadings, exhibits and argument before the court, Reese had to deny the restraining order.
He's a good judge and well prepared.
When you guys get a license to practice law, let me know. Your opinion would change on Reese's ruling.
Given the pleadings, exhibits and argument before the court, Reese had to deny the restraining order.
He's a good judge and well prepared.
When you guys get a license to practice law, let me know. Your opinion would change on Reese's ruling.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News