Started By
Message

Jessica Chambers jury says Not Guilty, but 7 say Guilty on Poll. Chaos in the courtroom

Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:07 pm
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18089 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:07 pm
Just happened.

I assume that the "Eric/Derek" deal caused reasonable doubt.

This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 2:25 pm
Top Replies
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18089 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

I have not followed this case at all. Is there overwhelming evidence?



I followed it closely with a class.

I would have a hard time voting 100% guilty. I think he's 90% guilty but there is enough doubt that by the law I could not vote guilty and sentence a man to die.

Without the first responders saying she said Eric or Derek did this and did not know the last name, I'd be closer, but not 100%.

Here is the verdict being read and the aftermath

LINK

That judge is a lot better man that I would have been in that situation.
This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 2:44 pm
All Replies (97)
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86501 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:08 pm to
Why didn't they more heavily pursue the eric/derek guy? Isn't he a dude who ran with tellis?
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18089 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Why didn't they more heavily pursue the eric/derek guy? Isn't he a dude who ran with tellis?



Apparently so.
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18089 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:12 pm to
Hold ON! Shitshow continues.

Judge just polled the jury and seven said Guilty. Deliberations will continue.

This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 2:13 pm
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
10417 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:12 pm to
I guess it's up to Louisiana now. Hope you have better prosecutors than we do.
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18089 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:14 pm to
These idiot jurors don't know what the word unanimous means.

Judge told them to get back at it. I am worried about the public school system in McComb, MS.
Posted by thelsutigers
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2009
3445 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:16 pm to
Are you shitting me? WTF, this is the talent pool of jurors in MS. Even if it is not unanimous, the majority vote was guilty, why would they walk out and say Not Guilty. You would think if you are going to F it up, at least pick the majority vote.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53019 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:17 pm to
Looked guilty to me
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79203 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:17 pm to
I suppose him changing his story a hundred times had no bearing on anything? Those prosecutors must be world beaters
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18089 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:18 pm to
Ive never seen anything like this.

They pulled the jury from McComb/Pike County because of the local coverage in Panola County.

One juror was thrown off because he tweeted about it.
Now the rest of them apparently have no clue how this works.

Judge has to declare a mistrial IMO. The guy's life is on the line and these idiots don't know what the word majority or unanimous means!
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:19 pm to
That's not a verdict, then. That's a technical error. They go back in there.
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
19537 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:21 pm to
Oh shite, it about to go live!
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
47397 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:22 pm to
How are you watching?
Posted by bubbz
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
22817 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:22 pm to
Link???
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18089 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:23 pm to
Now Law News Network streamed the jurors names. IN A CAPITAL MURDER TRIAL. This has to be declared mistrial.

If I am defense I don't move for mistrial. Its either not guilty or the easiest appeal in history.

This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 2:24 pm
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:23 pm to
NOT GUILTY YOU SAY?
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37250 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Why didn't they more heavily pursue the eric/derek guy?


One article I read stated that the cops questioned 15 or 20 Erics / Dereks.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26580 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:32 pm to
I have not followed this case at all. Is there overwhelming evidence?
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18089 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

I have not followed this case at all. Is there overwhelming evidence?



I followed it closely with a class.

I would have a hard time voting 100% guilty. I think he's 90% guilty but there is enough doubt that by the law I could not vote guilty and sentence a man to die.

Without the first responders saying she said Eric or Derek did this and did not know the last name, I'd be closer, but not 100%.

Here is the verdict being read and the aftermath

LINK

That judge is a lot better man that I would have been in that situation.
This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 2:44 pm
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28428 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:41 pm to
Odd IMO that the statement was allowed in given the physical even mental complications that the victim was suffering at the time.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram