Started By
Message

JAMA study: 62% (!) of positive rapid antigen tests were false positives among asymptomati

Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:02 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69279 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:02 pm
quote:

RAPID TESTS & FALSE POSITIVES: PCR tests have been criticized for picking up tiny amounts of clinically insignificant virus-large study "Of 623 total positive test results with rapid antigen tests, 385 (62%) were false positive";


Dang

This post was edited on 3/31/22 at 9:19 pm
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
35060 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:06 pm to
They identified as positive. Who the hell are you to tell them otherwise?
Posted by calcotron
Member since Nov 2007
8250 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:11 pm to
Forget all that other nonsense, how about they refund everyone for their garbage product. How many billions on tests?
Posted by Puffoluffagus
Savannah, GA
Member since Feb 2009
6097 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:12 pm to
Interesting study.

Basically it seems like if you're doing COVID tests for screening in asymptomatic individuals, if you test positive you should follow up with second test to confirm positivity since theres a good possibility that the first test was negative.

Basically kind of the opposite of what everyone was being told. Basically if you test positive trust the result and quarantine!
Posted by Vamos Brandonos
Member since Mar 2022
1021 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:13 pm to
By design.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73680 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

62% (!) of rapid antigen tests were false positives



Should read

62% of positives were false positives.
Posted by Sisselpud81
Member since Jan 2022
635 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:15 pm to
Class action dat arse straight to hell.
Posted by zippyputt
Member since Jul 2005
5758 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:28 pm to
Funny, all the fraud about the election, Covid, Hunter, Joe, testing, vax etc… coming out now.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21400 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:31 pm to
Why you don't test asymptomatics.
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38670 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:47 pm to
Isn't that why a positive result was recommended to have a second test which, according to the study, resulted in 94% accuracy.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41092 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:49 pm to
No shite.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72056 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Isn't that why a positive result was recommended to have a second test
No one was recommending a second test for a positive result.
Posted by GeauxTigers0107
South Louisiana
Member since Oct 2009
9710 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:50 pm to
This should shock no one here. The mask-loving sky screamers? Different story.
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
16452 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Why you don't test asymptomatics.


I wanted a free Big Mac tho.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56450 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

No one was recommending a second test for a positive result.



Not only that...but you couldn't test out of quarantine. A negative test didn't remove you from the quarantine period.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72056 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Not only that...but you couldn't test out of quarantine. A negative test didn't remove you from the quarantine period.
True, and anyone saying otherwise is simply trying to change history.

A positive test was considered positive and the only people who were allowed out of quarantine with a follow up test were athletes.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 10:05 pm to
And you can bet your arse they all knew about this
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
55994 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

A total of 179?127 rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests were performed, with a 0.35% positivity rate (623 positive antigen test results)


If I am reading this right, my concern would not be with the false positives, but would be with the false negatives. If the same error rate holds true with the false negatives, there were actually one hell of a lot more folks that had Covid than we know about.
Posted by Ry_garou
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2014
580 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 10:21 pm to
Can we lock LSUnurse and this data in a room together?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164088 posts
Posted on 3/31/22 at 10:25 pm to
51% of covid deaths in Louisiana last week were fully vaccinated people.

Biggest scam in history
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram