Started By
Message

Instead of a $1 billion Reservoir; the Corps decides on $2 billion to raise homes in La

Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:28 am
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32096 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:28 am
LINK

quote:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers estimates a proposed plan to elevate or floodproof nearly 3,300 homes, businesses and other buildings in the Amite River Basin would take 10 years to complete and could end up costing $2 billion.

Designed to reduce water damage in the populous Baton Rouge-area river basin after the devastating 2016 floods, the plan would replace the $1.3 billion Darlington Dam and smaller $1 billion home elevation program.

A long-discussed idea proposed anew in 2019, the 3.6-mile-long dam garnered opposition in East Feliciana and St. Helena parishes where it would be built and periodically inundate thousands of acres. The safety of the dam as well as the disproportionate impact on poor and minority residents were major reasons the Corps decided to shift gears.

Under the larger voluntary elevation program now proposed, homes in high-risk areas would be raised above the benchmark 100-year flood level while businesses, a few churches and public community centers, two fire stations and several grocery stores would be floodproofed to better withstand high water.

After a year-and-a-half startup phase, the agency estimates about 500 homes and businesses a year would be elevated or floodproofed once the still-unfunded plan got rolling, according to the Corps' draft report.

The Amite River Basin elevation program is one of a handful the Corps is proposing in south Louisiana to manage flood risk that would affect thousands of structures combined.


quote:

Kaitlyn Richard, a Corps senior project manager, said the draft feasibility report didn't directly consider the ability of the marketplace to handle the elevation program under the plan's 10-year timeline along with Corps and other government elevation programs.


quote:

The Amite River elevation proposal has already garnered concerns from some local officials who don't like the fact the plan would not stop floodwater from rising but only raise or beef-up structures to better handle the high water.

They point out the high water could still strand residents and flood roads and other infrastructure. Floodproofed businesses would generally only get that protection for up to 3 feet, after which it isn't deemed effective.


quote:

Among the reasons for the Darlington Dam's rejection was that it would displace so many poor and minority residents.


The lengths we go to avoid building critical infrastructure is astounding....
Posted by TigersnJeeps
FL Panhandle
Member since Jan 2021
1682 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:35 am to
Why not just move the overly impacted minories and poor?

Damned if they build a dam and damned if they don't
Posted by Limitlesstigers
Lafayette
Member since Nov 2019
2845 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:42 am to
Might as well buy out all the property and make it a floodplain but I'm sure some politician owns all the property there.
Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
2985 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:42 am to
East Baton Rouge, Livingston, Ascension people....you guys should all be harassing Landry, Broom, Kennedy, Graves, and everyone else in office to get the reservoir built and to accelerate the construction of the Comite Diversion Canal.

bullshite like this is why you won't be able to get insurance in 10 years.

This is why you will continue to flood every generation and economic opportunity will pass you by and your kids will have to move to Texas to find decent jobs.
Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
2985 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Might as well buy out all the property and make it a floodplain but I'm sure some politician owns all the property there.



It would cost half as much to do this. It's the obvious answer.

A reservoir would help prevent flooding. The added benefit is recreational opportunities and a development-free zone left in a natural state that the metro area would grow around.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57443 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Instead of a $1 billion Reservoir; the Corps decides on $2 billion to raise homes in La


quote:

the plan would replace the $1.3 billion Darlington Dam and smaller $1 billion home elevation program.

so either 2 bil to raise homes... or 1.3 + 1 bil for a dam and raise homes.

did you even read what the plan was?
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57443 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Among the reasons for the Darlington Dam's rejection was that it would displace so many poor and minority residents.
i still do not agree with decisions made on this.
Posted by Locoguan0
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2017
4293 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:51 am to
I hate the idea of imminent domain, but this is one of the few cases where it needs to happen.
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11093 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:53 am to
Just don’t let people live in the flood plain. Give them $2 billion to put down a nice down payment somewhere else.
Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
2985 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Among the reasons for the Darlington Dam's rejection was that it would displace so many poor and minority residents



Dozens and dozens of people would have to be relocated.

But no mention or concern for the tens of thousands of poor and minority residents that will flood regularly if they don't build the reservoir.

This is yet another stupid decision by our government.
Posted by idsrdum
Member since Jan 2017
450 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 9:58 am to
The Corps is required to follow Biden's Justice 40 Initiative.
quote:

I am committed to furthering the Administration’s goals under the whole-of-government Justice40 Initiative (reference 2.e) to help achieve the target to deliver at least 40% of the overall benefits from Federal investments in climate and critical clean water and waste infrastructure to disadvantaged communities

LINK
Posted by Locoguan0
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2017
4293 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 10:03 am to
EBR floodplain. Good luck with that.

Posted by NoBoDawg
Member since Feb 2014
1566 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 10:11 am to
Sheesh….we are laughing
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11093 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:

EBR floodplain. Good luck with that.


I see your point. That seems less than ideal.
Posted by ILurkThereforeIAm
In the Shadows, Behind Hedges
Member since Aug 2020
483 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 10:14 am to
quote:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers estimates a proposed plan to elevate or floodproof nearly 3,300 homes, businesses and other buildings in the Amite River Basin would take 10 years to complete and could end up costing $2 billio


The workforce needed to do this does not exist. Not to mention the interruptions from upcoming hurricanes that lead to supply chain issues and housing construction and elevation companies moving their resources to places with more recent disasters.

In addition, the Corps has never implemented a single-family housing program. I can't even begin to imagine the level of frickery that this will involve.

Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 11:34 am to
I don't care how much money they spend Mother Nature will ultimately win this fight.
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
1509 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 11:43 am to
As soon as the grandkids are gone, I'd like to move to north Louisiana, north Texas, North Carolina or Tennessee.

Anywhere away from hurricanes.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136811 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 11:48 am to
This is just a simple misunderstanding.

They meant RAZE, not RAISE
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33881 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 11:57 am to
quote:

3,300 homes, businesses and other buildings in the Amite River Basin would take 10 years to complete and could end up costing $2 billion


10 years and $600,000 per house? why?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84121 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

so either 2 bil to raise homes... or 1.3 + 1 bil for a dam and raise homes. did you even read what the plan was?


tOT in a nutshell.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram