- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:35 am to biggsc
thought I saw this was a two part series. Is it just a one nighter?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:36 am to LSUwag
quote:
There was victims blood on the door of his Bronco. That evidence was excluded because the Judge ruled it to be prejudicia
The blood found in the Bronco two days after the chase contained the blood preservative that was added to OJ's court ordered blood sample that was kept in the trunk of Van Adder's car overnight. No blood stains were found in the Bronco the night of the chase or the following day. Then guess who found them? I really don't have the slightest doubt that OJ killed those two but the evidence that Van Adder planted the blood is stronger than the evidence that OJ committed the murders. But he wasn't charged, as far as I know he wasn't even investigated. The jury made a reasonable decision when presented with the fact of planted evidence and the DA.s indifference to that corruption. Johnny Cochran's ranting didn't win the case, Barry Scheck's absolute, unassailable proof of Van Adder planting evidence won the case. Every prosecutor involved in that case should have been disbarred and charged.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:36 am to Scoop
Link?????
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:45 am to drexyl
The Braves pitcher?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:46 am to weagle99
quote:no, it was the Russians
OJ killed Jon Benet.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:49 am to biggsc
The only people retarded enough to believe that theory were coincidentally enough, the jurors for OJ's murder trial.
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 10:51 am
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:52 am to tigerpimpbot
The part about the socks on OJs floor that Dr. Henry Lee corroborated made a lot of sense to me as far as there was no foot in the socks when the blood was planted on them
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:54 am to papasmurf1269
OJ got off as pay-back for the white cops aquitted in the Rodney King trial.
Now can't we all just get along?
Now can't we all just get along?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:59 am to Scoop
Darden would have screwed up that piece of evidence too. The show's title makes no sense because the "evidence" they present only supports the theory that Jason may have helped, not that OJ was innocent. Even so any one of those defense attorneys, or hell even a public defender would rip their evidence to shreds.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 11:00 am to biggsc
quote:
ID Discovery show on OJ could be innocent
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 11:01 am
Posted on 1/16/17 at 11:03 am to shinerfan
quote:
Barry Scheck's absolute, unassailable proof of Van Adder planting evidence won the case.
He was the "Hero" of the defense for sure...but all you heard about was Cochran the fricking cockroach, like he was the mastermind...he was the damn sideshow attraction for the real brains.
F. Lee Bailey is a true POS, too.
Robert Shapiro and Kardashian were shocked and dismayed at the verdict. Robert's look of pure disbelief was priceless,
"Wait...wut?"
and Shapiro distanced himself from the team the same day the verdict was read...held his own presser to do it in, too.
"When this is over, if you see me on the street you'd better Carl Lewis your arse in the other direction. Kapish?"
To his credit, Sheck dedicated himself to "The Innocence Project" later on. Did he do this out of pride that he got OJ off...
Or penance?
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 11:13 am
Posted on 1/16/17 at 11:32 am to shinerfan
Great book written after the fact by Mark Fuhrman a couple of years later called Murder in Brentwood.
There is a picture of Fuhrman pointing to OJ's fingerprint in the victims blood on the courtyard gate. Not sure how they were supposed to have planted that. The crime scene detective didn't enter the roll of film (pre-digital) into evidence and all sorts of stuff got excluded.
The details of what didn't get into trial makes it pretty clear OJ killed them. I just feel bad for Goldman, he was just out to slay some cougar that night and got caught in the crossfire.
There is a picture of Fuhrman pointing to OJ's fingerprint in the victims blood on the courtyard gate. Not sure how they were supposed to have planted that. The crime scene detective didn't enter the roll of film (pre-digital) into evidence and all sorts of stuff got excluded.
The details of what didn't get into trial makes it pretty clear OJ killed them. I just feel bad for Goldman, he was just out to slay some cougar that night and got caught in the crossfire.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 12:21 pm to dukke v
quote:
Why do they keep pushing this OJ
Do you really have to wonder? After all, can't do any wrong...
Posted on 1/16/17 at 1:06 pm to biggsc
quote:
Jason Simpson could have been the murderer
There's been a private investigator saying this for years.
Here's a link to the guys book O.J. is Innocent
Posted on 1/31/17 at 9:22 am to jbgleason
quote:
I just feel bad for Goldman, he was just out to slay some cougar that night and got caught in the crossfire.
Wasn't he just there to return some glasses? Is it clear that OJ was already there at the time Goldman showed up?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 9:32 am to Marciano1
Still trying to figure out how OJ was able to kill both of them basically at the same time. You would think one of them could have gotten away...... or did he kill his wife first and then Goldman showed up and just got ambushed???????
Posted on 1/31/17 at 9:38 am to dukke v
Posted on 1/31/17 at 9:45 am to dukke v
quote:
Still trying to figure out how OJ was able to kill both of them basically at the same time. You would think one of them could have gotten away...... or did he kill his wife first and then Goldman showed up and just got ambushed???????
I think the only thing they were able to sort of "prove" is the chain of events:
1) Nicole is knocked unconscious by either knife, fist, or head bashed against post.
2) Ron is stabbed to death
3) Nicole's throat is slit
My guess is Ron shows up at the house and sees a fight breaking out...maybe Nicole tries to make a run for it through the front door and gets knocked out. That's when OJ somehow traps Ron into a corner and overpowers him. Finally, he finishes it off with cutting Nicole.
I'm no detective but it seems that's the likely PBP.
What's shocking is how NO ONE heard any of this taking place at 10pm at night in a neighborhood where the houses are almost connected to one another. All they heard was a dog barking. And then the murders took place in front of the house. How did no one hear this taking place?
This post was edited on 1/31/17 at 9:48 am
Posted on 1/31/17 at 9:51 am to biggsc
They never had any evidence against Jason. Only the old dude kept pushing this theory.
Only thing that came out of this show was some evidence found in the original case that could not be explained.
Only thing that came out of this show was some evidence found in the original case that could not be explained.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News