- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Florida Couple Has Sex on Beach; Will Now Register as Sex Offenders
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:06 am to kevg33
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:06 am to kevg33
quote:
The 3 yr old that saw them has no idea what was going on.
GTFO. A 3 year old also likely wouldn't understand what was going on if it was being raped. Guess we should just let that go too.
6
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:07 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
A 3 year old also likely wouldn't understand what was going on if it was being raped.
that escalated quickly
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:07 am to terd ferguson
At 3 years old? Wtf dude.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:07 am to LNCHBOX
Speaking from experience?
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:08 am to Oates Mustache
Kids grow up fast these days.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
when these people have to announce their status in the paper and go door to door, do you think it's to warn parents they once got caught fricking on a beach?
The location has nothing to do with it. It is because it was in public in front to of children. This is a much better application of the registry than a guy that pees in some bushes at Mardi Gras.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:09 am to TH03
quote:
OMG you're so funny.
-no one
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:09 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
GTFO. A 3 year old also likely wouldn't understand what was going on if it was being raped. Guess we should just let that go too.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:10 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
This is one of the exact reasons the registry was mad
You are a effing moron. This is one of the main reasons why sex offender registry is highly ineffective according to every study out there.
When 2/3 of sex offenders on the list are non violent/future threats, there is a glut and the real problem rapists, child pornographer etc can slip through the cracks amidst the crowd
If anything, shite like this makes the whole system more likely to benefit rapists. Don't be an idiot
This post was edited on 5/5/15 at 8:11 am
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:10 am to Oates Mustache
40 and 20 is not something you see every day, but creepy?
I'd go with inappropriate but not creepy.
Creepy suggests that a 40 year old guy has some kind of pathology if he wants to hook up with a good looking 20 year old. That's not a pathology.
I'd go with inappropriate but not creepy.
Creepy suggests that a 40 year old guy has some kind of pathology if he wants to hook up with a good looking 20 year old. That's not a pathology.
This post was edited on 5/5/15 at 8:12 am
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:12 am to GenesChin
quote:
If anything, shite like this makes the whole system more likely to benefit rapists. Don't be an idiot
So because these people are on it, that somehow benefits rapists? You're acting like these people didn't do anything wrong. You can't have sex in front of children.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:12 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
This is a much better application of the registry than a guy that pees in some bushes at Mardi Gras.
they're both terrible
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they're both terrible
One is much more appropriate than the other. I know you're smart enough to see the difference. I also know you'll ignore that just to keep making your point.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:14 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
So because these people are on it, that somehow benefits rapists?
do you think it's easier to monitor 1000 or 100,000 people?
quote:
You're acting like these people didn't do anything wrong.
no. they should face some sort of misdemeanor obscenity-type charge. nobody is saying they shouldn't have been charged of some crime
this is just way too much
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:15 am to StringedInstruments
America and the OT is full of prudes. 
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:15 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
One is much more appropriate than the other. I know you're smart enough to see the difference
just because one terrible example is slightly less terrible doesn't negate how shitty it is to make these people register
quote:
I also know you'll ignore that just to keep making your point.
nope
a felony is bad enough, but registration effectively ends the economic viability of tehse people. i hope you enjoy paying for their living for the next 40+ years
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:15 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
Broad daylight. Three year old watching.
Educational moment brah
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:16 am to LNCHBOX
Why are you so worked up
It's barely 8 am.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
do you think it's easier to monitor 1000 or 100,000 people?
Are these people constantly monitored to begin with?
quote:
no. they should face some sort of misdemeanor obscenity-type charge. nobody is saying they shouldn't have been charged of some crime
this is just way too much
Don't frick in front of kids (or anyone else that doesn't want to see it for that matter). It's offensive, it' sexual. What more do you need? Of course it's not equivalent to rape, but it's not exactly unrelated either.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 8:18 am to WeeWee
quote:
America and the OT is full of prudes.
Prude is not an applicable word here. Sex in front of kids is wrong, and you're a sick creep if you think it's ok.
Page 3 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News