- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does anyone actually believe OJ is innocent?
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:15 pm to SlowEasyConfident
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:15 pm to SlowEasyConfident
Take pictures.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:16 pm to Gorilla Ball
quote:
the only thing that makes wonder was did these damn gloves shrink or was oj putting on a show for them not to fit.
I think its both. Leather shrinks.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:18 pm to Gorilla Ball
quote:
think he killed both of them - the only thing that makes wonder was did these damn gloves shrink or was oj putting on a show for them not to fit. I think he's guilty as hel
Its been suggested he quit taking his arthritis medicine and otherwise deliberately inflamed his arthritis but how could he have known they would ask him to try on the glove?
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:19 pm to shinerfan
quote:
I think he killed them but I also think the jury made a reasonable decision based on the tainted blood evidence. Vannadder had overnight custody of the Blood sample taken from OJ. When that blood, containing the Blood preservative, showed up all over OJ's house and Bronco, (which went unnoticed following the chase), he should have been charged.
There was a blood trail of OJ's blood in the front driveway of Nicole's house. There wasn't any reason to plant further blood anywhere else.
All O.J. had to do was show back up from his trip with no cuts, which would have proven he wasn't the killer,
but low and behold he has a large cut on his hand which he said he did by throwing a glass into the sink of his hotel room upon hearing the news that Nicole was dead.
An obvious lie, since the blood on the driveway at Nicole's house was his, as verified through DNA tests.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:19 pm to jbgleason
quote:
People say Obama has divided the nation. He hasn't got shite on OJs lawyers. They got the nations black folk to root for a killer. Now that is something.
A killer that never gave a shite about common black folk either.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:20 pm to shinerfan
Good point - but if the gloves would have been soaked in blood and then dried they would've shrunk? Bastard
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:20 pm to OMLandshark
Daniel Petrocelli nailed his arse. He's 100% guilty. Just watch the civil litigation video depos and the forensic evidence. Those ugly arse Bruno Magli shoes fricked OJ hard.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:20 pm to OMLandshark
Not guilty =/= innocent
The prosecution did a terrible job
The prosecution did a terrible job
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:24 pm to tigerpimpbot
Good point about the shoes - oj eyes lit up like saucers - it was amazing
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:24 pm to SlowEasyConfident
Take pictures and divorce.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:26 pm to Gorilla Ball
quote:
Good point about the shoes - oj eyes lit up like saucers - it was amazing
Amazing moment
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:27 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
There was a blood trail of OJ's blood in the front driveway of Nicole's house. There wasn't any reason to plant further blood anywhere else.
All O.J. had to do was show back up from his trip with no cuts, which would have proven he wasn't the killer,
but low and behold he has a large cut on his hand which he said he did by throwing a glass into the sink of his hotel room upon hearing the news that Nicole was dead.
An obvious lie, since the blood on the driveway at Nicole's house was his, as verified through DNA tests.
Exactly. It's not even possible they could have gotten OJ's blood to plant at the scene of the crime. Take out the Bronco and his house, the blood at the scene of the crime (not to mention the ridiculous amount of other evidence) is all you need to incriminate him. The evidence is totally damning and anyone with a half a brain knows he did it.
In fact I worked for a guy that was one of his golf buddies. I mentioned the conspiracy theory of his son doing the crime, and he said that he knows OJ did it and he went on murderous rants about Nicole with his friends weeks before killing her. Didn't lknow they were friends before mentioning that.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:27 pm to OMLandshark
Vincent Bugliosi said it best - he said that the family's Akita was there and that the Akita would only let one person attack a family member (Nicole) without pouncing on the attacker, and that would be the alpha male (OJ).
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:30 pm to yoga girl
Couldn't remember what she looked like so I googled and she wasn't as hot as u remember
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:30 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
There was tons of it all over the crime scene. Lets assume it was planted in the Bronco. How does change the fact that his blood is all over the scene of the crime?
If some of the blood was proven to be planted, and it was, doesn't that raise suspicions about all of it? I think the prosecution made a huge error in just casually blowing off the blood preservative. Their failure to address what Vannadder did gave the jury a free hand to disregard all of the physical evidence. If I had been on that jury I think I would have voted him guilty anyway, but the decision wasn't nearly as outrageous as its remembered. Vannadder let OJ off the hook when he framed a guilty man.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:33 pm to shinerfan
quote:
If some of the blood was proven to be planted, and it was, doesn't that raise suspicions about all of it? I think the prosecution made a huge error in just casually blowing off the blood preservative. Their failure to address what Vannadder did gave the jury a free hand to disregard all of the physical evidence. If I had been on that jury I think I would have voted him guilty anyway, but the decision wasn't nearly as outrageous as its remembered. Vannadder let OJ off the hook when he framed a guilty man.
How do they get OJ's blood? The blood is all over the scene of the damn crime. Where did they get it? Until you can prove to me where they got the blood, then my evidence is superior.
And for the record, it wasn't planted.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:35 pm to OMLandshark
Every innocent person I have ever known leads police on an extensive chase while threatening suicide. What's not to believe?
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:36 pm to threeputt
Does this video answer your question?
Its a video of the different reactions around the country when the verdict was read. Spoiler alert, white people and black people didn't react in the same way.
Its a video of the different reactions around the country when the verdict was read. Spoiler alert, white people and black people didn't react in the same way.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:38 pm to OMLandshark
That whole fricking circus was Lance Ito's fault.
He should have barred TV cameras and put a gag order on everyone from the fricking start.
He should have barred TV cameras and put a gag order on everyone from the fricking start.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:39 pm to dukke v
Nicole was having an affair with Marcus allen. OJ was pissed when he found out and went to kill her in a rage. Ron Gilman happened to be there and was very unlucky.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News