Started By
Message

re: Does anyone actually believe OJ is innocent?

Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:15 pm to
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28164 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:15 pm to
Take pictures.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108295 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

the only thing that makes wonder was did these damn gloves shrink or was oj putting on a show for them not to fit.


I think its both. Leather shrinks.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22288 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

think he killed both of them - the only thing that makes wonder was did these damn gloves shrink or was oj putting on a show for them not to fit. I think he's guilty as hel


Its been suggested he quit taking his arthritis medicine and otherwise deliberately inflamed his arthritis but how could he have known they would ask him to try on the glove?
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

I think he killed them but I also think the jury made a reasonable decision based on the tainted blood evidence. Vannadder had overnight custody of the Blood sample taken from OJ. When that blood, containing the Blood preservative, showed up all over OJ's house and Bronco, (which went unnoticed following the chase), he should have been charged.



There was a blood trail of OJ's blood in the front driveway of Nicole's house. There wasn't any reason to plant further blood anywhere else.

All O.J. had to do was show back up from his trip with no cuts, which would have proven he wasn't the killer,

but low and behold he has a large cut on his hand which he said he did by throwing a glass into the sink of his hotel room upon hearing the news that Nicole was dead.

An obvious lie, since the blood on the driveway at Nicole's house was his, as verified through DNA tests.

Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45202 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

People say Obama has divided the nation. He hasn't got shite on OJs lawyers. They got the nations black folk to root for a killer. Now that is something.

A killer that never gave a shite about common black folk either.
Posted by Gorilla Ball
Member since Feb 2006
11667 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:20 pm to
Good point - but if the gloves would have been soaked in blood and then dried they would've shrunk? Bastard
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66927 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:20 pm to
Daniel Petrocelli nailed his arse. He's 100% guilty. Just watch the civil litigation video depos and the forensic evidence. Those ugly arse Bruno Magli shoes fricked OJ hard.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:20 pm to
Not guilty =/= innocent

The prosecution did a terrible job
Posted by Gorilla Ball
Member since Feb 2006
11667 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:24 pm to
Good point about the shoes - oj eyes lit up like saucers - it was amazing
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71393 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:24 pm to
Take pictures and divorce.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66927 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Good point about the shoes - oj eyes lit up like saucers - it was amazing


Amazing moment
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108295 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

There was a blood trail of OJ's blood in the front driveway of Nicole's house. There wasn't any reason to plant further blood anywhere else.

All O.J. had to do was show back up from his trip with no cuts, which would have proven he wasn't the killer,

but low and behold he has a large cut on his hand which he said he did by throwing a glass into the sink of his hotel room upon hearing the news that Nicole was dead.

An obvious lie, since the blood on the driveway at Nicole's house was his, as verified through DNA tests.



Exactly. It's not even possible they could have gotten OJ's blood to plant at the scene of the crime. Take out the Bronco and his house, the blood at the scene of the crime (not to mention the ridiculous amount of other evidence) is all you need to incriminate him. The evidence is totally damning and anyone with a half a brain knows he did it.

In fact I worked for a guy that was one of his golf buddies. I mentioned the conspiracy theory of his son doing the crime, and he said that he knows OJ did it and he went on murderous rants about Nicole with his friends weeks before killing her. Didn't lknow they were friends before mentioning that.
Posted by yoga girl
Member since Dec 2015
3673 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:27 pm to
Vincent Bugliosi said it best - he said that the family's Akita was there and that the Akita would only let one person attack a family member (Nicole) without pouncing on the attacker, and that would be the alpha male (OJ).
Posted by GeauxGoose
Nonya
Member since Dec 2006
2514 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:30 pm to
Couldn't remember what she looked like so I googled and she wasn't as hot as u remember
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22288 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

There was tons of it all over the crime scene. Lets assume it was planted in the Bronco. How does change the fact that his blood is all over the scene of the crime?




If some of the blood was proven to be planted, and it was, doesn't that raise suspicions about all of it? I think the prosecution made a huge error in just casually blowing off the blood preservative. Their failure to address what Vannadder did gave the jury a free hand to disregard all of the physical evidence. If I had been on that jury I think I would have voted him guilty anyway, but the decision wasn't nearly as outrageous as its remembered. Vannadder let OJ off the hook when he framed a guilty man.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108295 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

If some of the blood was proven to be planted, and it was, doesn't that raise suspicions about all of it? I think the prosecution made a huge error in just casually blowing off the blood preservative. Their failure to address what Vannadder did gave the jury a free hand to disregard all of the physical evidence. If I had been on that jury I think I would have voted him guilty anyway, but the decision wasn't nearly as outrageous as its remembered. Vannadder let OJ off the hook when he framed a guilty man.



How do they get OJ's blood? The blood is all over the scene of the damn crime. Where did they get it? Until you can prove to me where they got the blood, then my evidence is superior.

And for the record, it wasn't planted.
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:35 pm to
Every innocent person I have ever known leads police on an extensive chase while threatening suicide. What's not to believe?
Posted by prince of fools
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
1130 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:36 pm to
Does this video answer your question?

Its a video of the different reactions around the country when the verdict was read. Spoiler alert, white people and black people didn't react in the same way.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98745 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:38 pm to
That whole fricking circus was Lance Ito's fault.

He should have barred TV cameras and put a gag order on everyone from the fricking start.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103060 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:39 pm to
Nicole was having an affair with Marcus allen. OJ was pissed when he found out and went to kill her in a rage. Ron Gilman happened to be there and was very unlucky.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram