Started By
Message

re: Do you find the "Redskins" mascot offensive?

Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:21 pm to
as part native american (1/8th), I see why its offensive. But IDGAF.
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40970 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:46 pm to
10 Yes
85 No
Posted by 995webmaster
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
3780 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

as part native american (1/8th), I see why its offensive. But IDGAF


It's not the mascot that's the problem, it's the name, which is basically a racial slur.

I'm not personally offended, but I think they should change it.

In the meantime, I follow Gregg Easterbrook of ESPN and refer to them as the Potomac Drainage Basin Indigenous Persons.

FWIW, I the Cleveland Indians mascot, Chief Wahoo, is a lot more offensive.
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

No, but I know a large number of native americans that do.


No you don't.
Posted by ColeCoushCoush
Member since Aug 2014
497 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:59 pm to
It's not offensive to me personally, but it is clearly a racial slur.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67083 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:00 pm to
No, nor should anyone. "Redskin" is not and never was a prejorative term. It was always a term of endearment and a source of pride in the Native American community. Heck, the nickname "Redskins" for the Washington professional team was penned by Native Americans who played on the team!
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:00 pm to
Yes

Very
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35541 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:03 pm to
I don't find these to be offending.

Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:05 pm to
no
Posted by 995webmaster
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
3780 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

"Redskin" is not and never was a prejorative term.


From the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

Definition of REDSKIN

usually offensive
: american indian

______________________________

From Oxford Dictionaries
DATED or OFFENSIVE
An American Indian.

______________________________

Etc......
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30546 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:07 pm to
Nope
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Do you find the "Redskins" mascot offensive?


As I'm not American Indian, my opinion on the matter is moot. It's always seemed like the vast majority of American Indians did not find the term to be racist.

It's not for me to say. If a majority of American Indians came out and say it was, I'd say that was the answer.

Until then, this sounds like a few people ginning up complaints from mostly white people who feel the need to go along with any complain by a minority for fear of being labeled racist.
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40970 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:31 pm to
13 Yes
122 No
Posted by blight
central
Member since Jul 2012
1007 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

In the meantime, I follow Gregg Easterbrook of ESPN and refer to them as the Potomac Drainage Basin Indigenous Persons.


that has got to be the most stupidest thing i have ever heard
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

13 Yes 122 No


It is settled then...the name has got to go. In this country the voice of the minority is all that matters
Posted by JETigER
LSU 2011 National Champions
Member since Dec 2003
7081 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

No, but I know a large number of native americans that do.


Those native americans couldn't care less about taking advantage of my gambling addiction.
Posted by 81Tiger
LSU Alumnus
Member since Sep 2009
6628 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:57 pm to
Sorry, I am not familiar with that term!

Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40970 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 4:48 pm to
16 Yes
155 No
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 4:56 pm to
I think the true litmus test on whether this name is offensive is to offer up renaming the franchise the "Black Skins" because it more properly represents the make up of the team.

The outrage would be volcanic. Especially in DC. Which would make the point entirely.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram