Do you consider Wikipedia a credible source?

Whenever I want to look something up I go to Wikipedia first

Multiple studies have been done showing on average it is as accurate as a book encyclopedia. On average, obviously not always.

No. But it's a great starting point.

quote:

---

Do you consider it a credible source?

---

For the most part

I consider it a credible reference

What's the old rule, use Wiki but cite the sources at the bottom?

quote:

---

Do you consider Wikipedia a credible source?

---

Yes and no.

For instance, if the topic is something scientific or medical, I find that it's a very good source of quick info. Like if you want to look up quantum mechanics, or the side effects of some drug, or the traits of some breed of dog, I find it mostly credible.

On the other hand, when dealing with articles on real people, like actors/actresses, bands, and the like, it is not that rare an occurrence when I read entries that I know are not factual. I'm much more skeptical in those cases and will usually check other sources to ensure the validity of what Wikipedia says.

quote:

---

Do you consider it a credible source?

---

Why would you not, most wiki's are sourced at the bottom of the page where you can check the validity yourself.

It's good for quick easy information for a general overview. It isn't a credible source for serious research. I have noticed inconsistencies and conjecture stated as fact before. This can happen with other sources too though.

Yes.