Do these weekly workout and diet totals seem excessive?

I couldn't help but notice no curls in the squat rack.... amateur.

quote:

---

usually bypass breakfast and lunch

---

quote:

---

- usually bypass breakfast and lunch
- eat large dinner and whatever else you may want

---

Im no Dr. Oz but this seems highly unhealthy.

This sounds horrible

Only thing that matters is the shirtless pics. The ends justifies the means.

quote:

---

Weekly Workout Totals
400 squats
1120 calf raises
200 leg extensions
200 leg curls
120 barbell curls
240 triceps extensions
192 bench presses
164 butterfly presses
192 military presses
128 pull-ups
600 sit-ups
2 hours on the treadmill

---

No wonder the Oregon football players are hospitalized with rhabdomyolysis

Something looks out of kilter. Is That barbell curls for the day?

Too many reps

quote:

---

What's wrong with bypassing those meals? They're useless.

---

Why are they useless?

quote:

---

400 squats
1120 calf raises
200 leg extensions
200 leg curls
120 barbell curls
240 triceps extensions
192 bench presses
164 butterfly presses
192 military presses
128 pull-ups
600 sit-ups
2 hours on the treadmill

---

Unless this "workout plan" offers some form of daily structure that details a typical daily split, chances are an individual with a novice background in fitness will not properly distribute these reps. That's a shite ton of volume to recover from if you are just starting out.

Also, I take issue with the fact that the workout is based around prescribed volume for each individual exercise. There is no prescribed weight percentage given for the compound movements so chances are an individual can quickly frick this up in a hurry.

And to answer your question...yes, the totals are remarkably excessive, regardless of intensity. Resistance training shouldn't be treated as a aerobic/cardio-specific activity.

Finally, good luck adapting to all of that shite when you are in a caloric deficit and consuming a mere 2000 calories/day.