re: at what waist size are you *definitely* a fatty?

Well if there is a waist size that defines overweight then exactly what is the weight that defines overweight?

6'4 220 and I wear 36. I got pretty slender and dipped into a 34 a few years back, but I was way too thin for my frame. A lot of short fricks in this thread talking out of their asses

Anything above 32

34". I'm skinny fat. I'm 6'. 197

I'm 6' 230 and I'm in a 34 now but I buy 36's in some pants. I have a stocky frame and lift heavy. Deadlifts will give you a thicker core. At 38 I'd feel really fat.

You downvoters are fat pussies

Height to waist ratio is what we should be looking at here.

I wear a size 32 waist, but my waist actually measures at 36". My ratio is .54. I'd like to get to .50

Anything above .56 is a fatty IMO.

So my ratio is good.

I think it is more a length to width ratio.

8"+ larger width than length definite fatty.

I'm 6'3" 205 and wear 34x34, and wore that size while very lean.

This guy is still rockin' his 32s, think he's a fatty...?

I'm in my late forties and rocking a dad body. I've been 6'4" and 200+ since I was 14. At 285 my waist is a 40 right now and I'm a fatty. At 235-240 I'd have a 36 waist. My doc says 235-245 is my ideal weight

There are very few men with a 40" or more waist who aren't fat, imho. Ive always been curious how those huge athletes find clothes, ive always had hell finding something that fits well.