Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Started By
Message

Army dudes: M-1A2 question

Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:08 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56336 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:08 pm
So I'm having a ridiculous debate about who would win in a fight between a tank (type unspecified) and a crowd armed only with molotov cocktails.

I've sat in an M-1A2 before, but can someone give me an experienced rundown of its various (unclassified) capabilities and why people with bottles of gasoline would all be completely fricked?
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45804 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:10 pm to
How close is the crown to the tank when hostilities break out?
Posted by VeniVidiVici
Gaul
Member since Feb 2012
1728 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:11 pm to
Paging Vader
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

a crowd armed only with molotov cocktails.


How big, and how committed, is the crowd?
Posted by Phil A Sheo
equinsu ocha
Member since Aug 2011
12166 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:13 pm to
If tank is fully loaded , crowd hasn't got a chance
Posted by TU Rob
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2008
12738 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:14 pm to
Doesn't that version have the machine gun that can be remotely fired?
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58340 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:15 pm to
I'm guessing a fully crewed tank?


My money is on the tank.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56336 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

How close is the crown to the tank when hostilities break out?
Unspecified, but they'd have to be pretty close to be within throwing distance.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124187 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:16 pm to
Crowd wins.

Look up the winter war.

Hell, look up the Ukrainian protesters
Posted by gmrkr5
NC
Member since Jul 2009
14891 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:17 pm to


vs



hmmmm
Posted by Phil A Sheo
equinsu ocha
Member since Aug 2011
12166 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

My money is on the tank.


Correct M1 can hit a target while on the move from a mile out.. Tank wins
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124187 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:18 pm to


But it would be versus dozens of them
This post was edited on 4/7/14 at 1:19 pm
Posted by H.M. Murdock
B.A.'s Van
Member since Feb 2013
2113 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:19 pm to
The US does not operate like third world Muslim militaries. Armor will accompanied by lighter armored vehicles and infantry. In reality the Molotov throwing nut jobs would be killed pretty quickly.
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Correct M1 can hit a target while on the move from a mile out.. Tank wins


What if the target is on top of the turret?
Posted by gmrkr5
NC
Member since Jul 2009
14891 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

But it would be versus dozens of them



and?
Posted by Phil A Sheo
equinsu ocha
Member since Aug 2011
12166 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

What if the target is on top of the turret?


Drive the damn tank through a building problem solved..

Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:20 pm to
Too close for missiles, I'm switching to guns.
Posted by gmrkr5
NC
Member since Jul 2009
14891 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

What if the target is on top of the turret?



he would be on fire apparently
Posted by Phil A Sheo
equinsu ocha
Member since Aug 2011
12166 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

he would be on fire apparently


..or this

smokem if you got um
This post was edited on 4/7/14 at 1:22 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64555 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:22 pm to
They could disable the tank if they hit it in the right places. But even here they'd be hard pressed to hit it in the right places so long as the tank kept moving. Basically if they did hit it in the right places, it would be what we use to call a "mobility kill" in that they could render it immobile but the tank would still be capable of defending itself.

As for killing the crew inside? No. So long as their ammo held up they could continue to mow people down. Here is a look at the weapons on an M1A2....



You've got the main gun (120mm smooth bore cannon), coax 7.62 MG mounted next to the main gun (it's the small tube sticking out just right of the main gun), the commander has a .50 MG and the loader also has a 7.62 MG. Of all these weapons systems, only the loader's MG requires a hatch be opened to fire. All the other weapons can be fired from inside the tank with all hatches buttoned up. The TC's .50 does require the ammo box be changed once he's exhausted his ammo and that also requires a hatch be opened. But the main gun and the coax MG have a shite ton ammo internally and could cut down theoretically thousands before all ammo is exhausted.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram