- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/19/13 at 2:33 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:Uhhh... A National Championship?
What possible motivation could you have to do that all over again?
Posted on 4/19/13 at 2:34 pm to St Augustine
quote:
And below average play from the LT spot.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 2:35 pm to HollierThanThou
Could be, I think he is a perfect fit for rob/Rex Ryan defense. Use him as a nickel corner and at safety to reek havoc. Have him roam, blitz, play man, zone. You can use him so many ways
Posted on 4/19/13 at 2:47 pm to jralspanky
redos aren't much fun!
but as a Mathieu fan as well that is kinda disturbing. wonder if he will be able stay motivated...
but as a Mathieu fan as well that is kinda disturbing. wonder if he will be able stay motivated...
Posted on 4/19/13 at 2:49 pm to DelU249
I agree. I hope he lands with a DC that understands how to utilize him rather than just plugging him into a spot.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 3:12 pm to St Augustine
quote:
In the 2nd game in Louisiana we didn't cross the Godamn 50 yard line. They were obviously better.
Nah, man, it's just because we didn't give a shite. We didn't have the motivation of a national title or anything. It's kinda like if this season we beat Georgia during the regular season but still face them in the SEC title game. There's no reason for us to even play. In my mind, we are SEC champs no matter the outcome. That's just the way my boy the honey badger saw it. He was totally right. For this progressive way of thinking, I think we should trade up to the number 1 pick in the first round and draft him there. Why not? You have to take risks to win, right?
Posted on 4/19/13 at 3:23 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
I don't think attempting multiple 40+ yard FGs, missing most and getting one blocked is outplaying LSU. LSU was on Bamas goal line right before the first half but time ran out. LSU could have (and should have been called) a TD in OT. IMO Bama was the one who got outplayed.
LSU also rushed for more yards than Bama. Is that an aspect of the game of football?
LSU won at Bama. The LSU D held Bama to trying 40+ yard FG's. And the other things mentioned here as well. People with this "Bama was better" bullshite can frick off. LSU played the better schedule and LSU beat fricking Bama at their house. Yet people want to give Bama credit for winning a fricking rematch/do-over/second chance/mulligan?
GTFO.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 3:27 pm to bigcobra
quote:
The game was won if they play defense on the last drive.
Ah, so you're of the theory that only the last minute of a game is all that matters? The other 59 minutes were just for show?
The D held Bama to 5 straight 3 and out's in the 2nd half.
Miles fricked that game with 4 ridiculous trick plays that were totally unnecessary. Miles also called a horrible TO right before half that actually helped Bama and gave them time to score a TD. And then Miles goes full pussy at the end of the game and instead of either punting or letting Mett go for it on 4th down, he pulls a Saban and tries a FG that we all knew the kicker couldn't make.
But yeah, you're right, it was the defense's fault.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 3:33 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
Yet people want to give Bama credit for winning a fricking rematch/do-over/second chance/mulligan?
I give LSU credit all day for beating Bama the first game, but why does it matter that the second one was a rematch? You act as if LSU didn't know what would happen if they lost. And you can bet your arse that team was trying to win. They knew what was at stake, unless the whole team was a bunch of idiots like the honey badger.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 3:42 pm to HollierThanThou
It would be a wasted pick if the Saints selected Honey Badger. He needs to get the hell out of Louisiana if he wants any chance at success.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 3:53 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
Brettasaurus Rex
Well said.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 4:01 pm to F machine
quote:
but why does it matter that the second one was a rematch?
Because they didn't deserve to be there dude. They lost. This isn't the NFL with playoffs.
ESPN singlehandedly put them in the game because it fit their agenda. How can you not see how deflating that can be to LSU despite the chance for a title? if you get beat at home and dont even play in your own conference championship, I'm sorry but your arse is on the couch. Not getting a redo. Okie State should have been in the game, no argument about it. They were a hell of a lot closer to being undefeated than Bama was.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 4:05 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
Because they didn't deserve to be there dude. They lost. This isn't the NFL with playoffs.
ESPN singlehandedly put them in the game because it fit their agenda. How can you not see how deflating that can be to LSU despite the chance for a title? if you get beat at home and dont even play in your own conference championship, I'm sorry but your arse is on the couch. Not getting a redo. Okie State should have been in the game, no argument about it. They were a hell of a lot closer to being undefeated than Bama was.
None of this was LSU's choice. They should have just went and played and not worried about that. This isn't the first time a non-conference winner played in the title game.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 4:15 pm to F machine
quote:
None of this was LSU's choice. They should have just went and played and not worried about that. This isn't the first time a non-conference winner played in the title game.
That's my point dude. It was completely out of their control. They go to Tuscaloosa and come out victorious in one of the most hard hitting games in recent history. And that meant absolutely nothing the moment Bama was let in the title game.
How is that so hard to understand?
This post was edited on 4/19/13 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 4/19/13 at 4:17 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
SU won at Bama. The LSU D held Bama to trying 40+ yard FG's. And the other things mentioned here as well. People with this "Bama was better" bullshite can frick off. LSU played the better schedule and LSU beat fricking Bama at their house. Yet people want to give Bama credit for winning a fricking rematch/do-over/second chance/mulligan?
And we didn't belong on the field the second time. Take of the homer glasses dude. They were and still are the dominant program.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 4:26 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
ESPN singlehandedly put them in the game because it fit their agenda.
they were put in the game because they were by far the best remaining team in the country
Posted on 4/19/13 at 4:29 pm to St Augustine
Disagree Okie State should have been in.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 4:39 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Right because we would've easily beaten them. Bama would've been a 14 point favorite over ok state.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News