- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Teams Currently More Strapped For 2013 Cap Room Than The Saints
Posted on 3/21/13 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 3/21/13 at 7:58 pm
San Francisco 49ers $123,771,245 <---LOLZ
Tennessee Titans $121,761,094
Dallas Cowboys $121,664,214
New York Giants $121,594,531
Pittsburgh Steelers $120,033,716
Carolina Panthers $119,120,697
Chicago Bears $119,256,249
Kansas City Chiefs $119,904,685
San Diego Chargers $118,806,608
Teams currently with $23,000,000+ in Cap Room
Cincinnati Bengals $92,112,210
Cleveland Browns $93,953,911
Jacksonville Jaguars $95,129,398
Tampa Bay Buccaneers $97,608,640
Philadelphia Eagles $99,694,269
Source for the numbers
Tennessee Titans $121,761,094
Dallas Cowboys $121,664,214
New York Giants $121,594,531
Pittsburgh Steelers $120,033,716
Carolina Panthers $119,120,697
Chicago Bears $119,256,249
Kansas City Chiefs $119,904,685
San Diego Chargers $118,806,608
Teams currently with $23,000,000+ in Cap Room
Cincinnati Bengals $92,112,210
Cleveland Browns $93,953,911
Jacksonville Jaguars $95,129,398
Tampa Bay Buccaneers $97,608,640
Philadelphia Eagles $99,694,269
Source for the numbers
3
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:01 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Cincinnati Bengals $92,112,210
Jesus how can you have that little money spent!
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:02 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
I would laugh more at the Titans, Panthers, and Chiefs than the 9ers. At least the 9ers are good. 
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:04 pm to saintsfan92612
I'm laughing at them currently being over the cap.
They're gonna have to do a lot of work if they want to land Nnamdi.
They're gonna have to do a lot of work if they want to land Nnamdi.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:07 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Technically the cap isn't an even $23 mil. It was set at about $23.9 but the most of that .9 is set aside for something(I forget what at the moment).
But yeah how they hell can they sign ANYONE else.
But yeah how they hell can they sign ANYONE else.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:08 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
Jesus how can you have that little money spent!
qb on rookie deal, stud WR on rookie deal
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:11 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
Technically the cap isn't an even $23 mil. It was set at about $23.9 but the most of that .9 is set aside for something(I forget what at the moment).
did not know that.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:11 pm to St Augustine
Also, their team sucks.
How are the 49ers gonna sign 14 draft picks?
How are the 49ers gonna sign 14 draft picks?
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:16 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
Jesus how can you have that little money spent!
Several smaller market teams have been consistently underspending.
The new CBA is looking to prevent this.
quote:
Getting under the salary cap isn't the only challenge that NFL teams face. Some franchises, especially small market teams, will have to find a way to add enough salary to reach the league's cap floor. This season will be the first under the latest collective bargaining agreement that will force teams to spend at least 88.8 percent of the salary cap over a four-year period.
As mentioned above, the Colts have plenty of space and they will have to spend it. Their current commitments are around $78 million, almost $30 million short of the cap floor. That's more than a few expensive veterans, or about 60 minimum-salary players. Roster limitations means Indianapolis will be looking at the former.
Joining the Colts in the "must spend a lot of money" club are Cleveland, Cincinnati and Miami. The Bengals look to benefit the most from being forced to add salary, as they have made the playoffs two-straight years but are still short of contending with the best teams in the AFC. The Browns and Dolphins both have young offensive leaders that would likely welcome some added talent in their supporting cast.
The floor certainly adds a new dimension to the salary cap balancing-act around the league. It appears that veterans cut by the Jets, Saints, and Cowboys may find new work easier with the Colts, Browns, and Dolphins. This will add even more parity to a league that already enjoys plenty.
LINK
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:18 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Why wouldn't they spend it? Does the owner get whats left?
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:19 pm to Breesus
quote:
How are the 49ers gonna sign 14 draft picks?
don't think they will. I think they are going to trade A LOT of them for better future picks and keep stocked for a few years. They are going to lose some of these defenders when they have to pay Kapernick. I truly believe they have the largest accumulation of talent in over a decade on one roster.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:20 pm to cssamerican
quote:
Why wouldn't they spend it? Does the owner get whats left?
The owner is the one paying the salaries, so yes.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:23 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
The owner is the one paying the salaries, so yes.
I thought that was TV revenue that was dedicated to player salary. So, what you are saying is it is owner's money and they there has been a limit on how much they can spend. I am surprised more teams haven't went the cheap route if that was the case.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:24 pm to cssamerican
quote:
Why wouldn't they spend it? Does the owner get whats left?
lol where you think that money comes from?
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:24 pm to bonethug0108
Just checked the 49ers and it looks like they added something wrong. Seems they are closer to $120 mil(top 51 + dead money - rollover).
Still less room than us.
Still less room than us.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:27 pm to cssamerican
The revenues determine the cap(not just tv, but the players get the largest portion from that). Basically it's a way to determine about how much the owner's will make, and then take the cap out of that.
And some owners have stayed cheap for years. Most of them learned that you actually make less when people stop coming to games rather than just paying players though.
And some owners have stayed cheap for years. Most of them learned that you actually make less when people stop coming to games rather than just paying players though.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:29 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
Still less room than us.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:32 pm to Sho Nuff
They should be sitting at $121,101,245.
That leaves them with about $2 mil, which is likely why we are able to offer Nnamdi more(we have about $5.5 mil in space).
That leaves them with about $2 mil, which is likely why we are able to offer Nnamdi more(we have about $5.5 mil in space).
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:43 pm to bonethug0108
We still don't know what we paid Watson and the fact the Browns could have paid to keep him isn't very reassuring.
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:49 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Will smith still 8 million against the cap! Crazy
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News