Started By
Message

re: Quote from the losing QB

Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

100% certainty my arse
oh ok, the Saints Board would be railling against Brees just like they are against Cam.

Yea, that's it, no doubt about it, right?

Hilarious.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:15 pm to
The "what if" game is a weak argument. You can't use that and then accuse someone of using ploys.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

The "what if" game is a weak argument
Only because you know it's how Saints fans would react do you think it's a weak argument.

You act like I'm saying something outrageous when it's pretty much the most likely thing you could imagine. Saints fans would support Brees more than Cam, not exactly a bold take by me.

But I get it, every player and team will always think they're better, but heavens no, please don't say it, that's an outrage...unless you won a title, then you can say it and it's tooootttallllllly different.

Hell, multiple replies have come in saying it's ok for Kobe to say these kinds of things, but it's a crazy ploy for me to think Saints fans would be ok with Brees doing it?
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 12:28 pm
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Only because you know it's how Saints fans would react do you think it's a weak argument.



It's a weak argument because it's a textbook appeal to probability fallacy.

quote:

You act like I'm saying something outrageous when it's pretty much the most likely thing you could imagine


No, I didn't. I'm saying you're being hypocritical by accusing someone of using a ploy when you're arguments are fallacious.

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

it's a textbook appeal to probability fallacy.
How so?

There is no error in my logic, hence it's not a fallacy.

My logic is that if Brees said the same thing he wouldn't get the same reaction as Cam does from this board. Don't give me the fallacy stuff, do you agree with that, yes or no? I doubt you'll answer though.

If you agree, then you trap yourself in the fallacy insinuation. If you disagree...well...prayers sent.
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 12:49 pm
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

An appeal to probability (or appeal to possibility) is the logical fallacy of taking something for granted because it would probably be the case (or might possibly be the case).[1] Inductive arguments lack deductive validity and must therefore be asserted or denied in the premises.
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
60262 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

My logic is that if Brees said the same thing

He didn't.

Thus the fallacy.

You lose. Cam lost. Get over it.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:56 pm to
It fits none of these criteria, not one.

Not deceptive, not misleading, not a false notion, not an unsound argument, not false in nature, and so on and so forth...

quote:

noun, plural fal·la·cies.
1. a deceptive, misleading, or false notion, belief, etc.: That the world is flat was at one time a popular fallacy.
2. a misleading or unsound argument.
3. deceptive, misleading, or false nature; erroneousness.
4. Logic. any of various types of erroneous reasoning that render arguments logically unsound.
5. Obsolete , deception.



My argument is that Cam is treated differently and more negatively than Drew Brees on a Saints Talk message board. You're trying to tell me that is poor reasoning? Ok, we'll agree to disagree, i think the reasoning couldn't possibly be more accurate, logical, and meaningful pertaining to my take on this situation, to be honest.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

He didn't.

Thus the fallacy
Not sure you understand the whole fallacy thing if that's your take.

I've been using the term logic for a few pages now, that seems to be getting lost in this entire little fallacy talk stuff.

No one wants to address the flaw in my logic, where is it? Stop with the "brees didn't say it", that makes no sense in this discussion.
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 12:59 pm
Posted by JPLIII
Broussard - terd supporter
Member since Jan 2008
22630 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:02 pm to
Wait, what is all this about anyway?
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
60262 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:03 pm to
I see it's pointless arguing with you since you don't even accept the fact that there's a substantial difference between Brees & Newton in how they speak publicly.

So I rest my case and let the OP speak on its own merits.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Wait, what is all this about anyway?
I don't even know any more.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

since you don't even accept the fact that there's a substantial difference between Brees & Newton in how they speak publicly
I've never once said that or anything close to it, so it sounds like you're the one it's pointless to argue with if you want to make up thoughts and assign them to me.

quote:

So I rest my case
Rest your case on a completely made up statement? Yikes
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

I've been using the term logic for a few pages now, that seems to be getting lost in this entire little fallacy talk stuff.



The flaw in your logic is you're taking a probability and asserting it as a definite outcome in your given scenario.

It's like that video they made of Obama voters who didn't know who had no clue who Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi was, and to deflect, people said "And I could make that same video with Tea Party voters," but there is no video. It didn't happen.

You're doing the same exercise.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

The flaw in your logic is you're taking a probability and asserting it as a definite outcome in your given scenario
I can ask you again, but I know that's pointless because you won't answer and if you did, your honest answer would give the argument away.


This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 1:21 pm
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:24 pm to
Whether I agree with your prediction or not doesn't make your assertion any less fallacious.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

the flaw in my logic


none really, but it is just an opinion made on assumptions

this is cam being a sore loser, or best case not having the emotional intelligence to convey what he wants to communicate and sounding like a sore loser...also the timing is pretty bad. If he said this a few days later or leading up to round 2, doesn't come off as bad. He said this directly after a very convincing arse beating. He's dancing around, doing the plane, egging on fights and celebrating every thing when he is winning, and then this when he loses. It comes off bad, no?

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:31 pm to
I give up on the ignoring of the reason and logic portion of this fallacy debate. Done with it.

You've moved this so far away from the topic we were discussing, I'm not even sure what you disagree with me on, relating to the actual topic.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110806 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

this is cam being a sore loser
I say it makes him a dude who isn't lying while other guys are lying in this spot.

quote:

none really, but it is just an opinion made on assumptions
To be fair, there are no stats or anything we can point to in this discussion, so we're all throwing out opinions and assumptions.
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
21328 posts
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:35 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram