Started By
Message

re: Confirmed: Saints would have taken Mahomes if Lattimore was off the board

Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:04 pm to
Posted by breauxmosexual
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2016
2526 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:04 pm to
I clarified the OP for the mentally challenged. Hope this helps tigerskin. Good luck to you and keep pushing yourself
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 7:05 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68695 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:07 pm to
Remember when some fricktards thought greyson was a good pick? This would have been worse.

Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
40297 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:22 pm to
Just admit that you don't know how to write coherently. Glad I could help.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76529 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

Mahomes is not worth a top 15 pick. Probably not even first round.


He's actually worth a first, 2 thirds, and a fourth
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48439 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:27 pm to
It's a nice spin. That isn't how it went down. They wanted the QB and Foster. Lost both of them.

LINK
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:28 pm to
Andy Reid and CSP both think he's worth a 1st rounder plus. I'll have to go with them over a poster on the net who thinks otherwise.

CSP said he was impressed in his workouts, so if he felt he could step in after Drew retires and lead this team then I would be good with the pick. I'd rather have a top QB waiting in the wings than scrambling for a QB when Drew calls it quits which could be anytime.
Posted by djmicrobe
Planet Earth
Member since Jan 2007
4970 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:46 pm to
It makes me wonder if Reid tried to trade with the Saints, but were turned down, so they jumped them. There was no reason for Reid to trade for the #10 pick when they could have easily traded the Saints for the #11 to get the same QB.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28384 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:50 pm to
I think Reid and (evidently) Payton see his potential as Brett Favre Big arm gunslinger who just ran around in college and made some great throws and some horrible throws. Reid helped mold Favre. I guess he thinks he can do the same with Mahomes.

Of all the available QBs, he likely has the best chance of becoming a star
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37202 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

tried to trade with the Saints, but were turned down, so they jumped them
Well, Saints don't trade down. If any year proves it, it's this year.

Saints pick #11
#10 traded back
#12 traded back

Saints pick #32
#31 traded back
#33 was GB pick from an earlier trade back

Both Saints 1st round picks were sandwiched between trade backs (3) or a pick (33) that was a result of a trade back.

I'd have a hard time believing Saints were simply excluded from trade back conversations at #11. #32 was a different beast, but #32 is a prime trade back spot, especially considering the guy they wanted just got picked.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 9:04 pm to
We didn't trade back because the 3rd or 4th player on their board was falling to them. If they trade back he won't be there later.

Plus if Lattimore did come off they were happy with Mahomes falling to them.

They figured they either get a VERY good player or the potential future of the franchise.

And the niners jumped us. We were sitting for Foster but still had him, Ramcyzk and another unnamed player on the board, all with mid first round grades.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 9:06 pm
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37202 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 9:06 pm to
Have the Saints ever traded back in the 1st round under Loomis/Payton?
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 9:07 pm to
No. Someone they want and have valued at the pick always falls to them.

They said if they ever had a situation where no players were valued as high as the pick they would trade back. Hasn't happened in the first yet.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 9:08 pm
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37202 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 9:14 pm to
As per our discussion earlier this morning, I don't need you to explain the Saints thought process.

I understand the Lattimore pick. I like the Lattimore pick.

But the Saints history of being trade back averse is glaring.

And personally I don't agree with their philosophy. The deal the Brown got, moving back to #25 and getting a 1st next year is a more prudent move IMO.
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40971 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 9:15 pm to
What if Mahomes turns out to be awesome?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68322 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 10:14 pm to
quote:


Andy Reid and CSP both think he's worth a 1st rounder plus. I'll have to go with them over a poster on the net who thinks otherwise.

CSP said he was impressed in his workouts, so if he felt he could step in after Drew retires and lead this team then I would be good with the pick. I'd rather have a top QB waiting in the wings than scrambling for a QB when Drew calls it quits which could be anytime.

I think you ought to review the history of QBs taken in the first round. Odds are Payton and Reid are wrong. Many of those disappointments were far greater "locks" than Mahomes.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 10:15 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47918 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 10:17 pm to
Lmfao if this doesn't confirm Payton's absolute stupidity when it come to the draft, even to the idiot fans who swallowed that shite sandwich of a draft this year and convinced themselves it was good, nothing will.
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

I think you ought to review the history of QBs taken in the first round.


They're all tossups, im just saying if CSP liked the kid and thought he'd be a good heir to Drew i wouldnt have had a problem with the pick. I'd rather have a top prospect waiting than a 3rd round project for when the day comes.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68322 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 10:23 pm to
I understand having Drew's replacement on board, but not with a really questionable prospect at pick 11. Even if Lattimore wasn't there, there were about 30 other guys who would have been a better choice.

If Payton really was going to spend 11 on Mahomes with our historically bad defense, it may be just about time for him to go. Last year Goff was a much better prospect and that guy is a disappointment.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 10:24 pm
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

If Payton really was going to spend 11 on Mahomes with our historically bad defense, it may be just about time for him to go.


It wouldnt have been a popular selection because of that reason, but the day is approaching that the saints will draft a QB high to follow Drew.

quote:

Last year Goff was a much better prospect and that guy is a disappointment.


I believe 70% or so of a players career is all about circumstance. Look at Drew in S.D ... Takes the right player with the right coach to make it work. How many times you see a dominant player chase the money to another team and just fall off?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47918 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 10:32 pm to
We will not sniff the playoffs this year and hopefully this train wreck will be over. If he's allowed to stay longer he will continue to sink us deeper and deeper. We have a top 5 QB and we are the only franchise with one that isn't even a player in the title race for one reason Sean Payton.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram