Started By
Message

Name me one thing positive Willie Green has done as coach?

Posted on 2/4/24 at 11:08 pm
Posted by Islandboy777
DAUPHIN ISLAND
Member since Jul 2023
1159 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 11:08 pm
He gave a speech during the play in game vs the Clippers.

The only reason he was hired because BI and his buddies liked him over SVG?

Name me anything positive because I don't see it
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71213 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 11:47 pm to
This board is tiresome at times.

No new ground is being broken anymore. It's just old topics masked as new topics.
Posted by higgsBoson
Democratic Party
Member since Jan 2012
1417 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:26 am to
quote:

This board is tiresome at times. No new ground is being broken anymore. It's just old topics masked as new topics.


There’s just honestly nothing to talk about…
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17950 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 4:35 am to
quote:

Name me one thing positive Willie Green has done as coach?


1) Lead a team without Zion to the playoffs two years ago.

2) Lead this year's team, at this point in the season, to its best record in six years.

3) Help develop young players such as Trey, Jose, Herb, Dyson, and Naji.


So glad that I could help you this morning.
Posted by fightingtigers98
Member since Oct 2011
13243 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 5:13 am to
He’s had a winning record in 2/3 seasons so far and has us in the playoffs/play-in in all 3 as it stands.

Is Willie flawed? Yes. But you went with a young coach who had no experience, you can’t be surprised when there are growing pains with a young coach just like there are with a young player.

Can you do better than Willie right now? Absolutely, but if you have confidence in him as an organization for 3 years down the line, let it ride.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61571 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 6:21 am to
quote:

There’s just honestly nothing to talk about…


Yeah, because the team is playing pretty well and people are trained to complain. There are always more new threads after a loss than a win.

What’s worse is most of the negativity people talk about are based on worst case scenario projections of future events. I’m not saying the fears are totally unfounded, but they are exaggerated.

For instance, people act like BI will become an untradeable player on his next deal and that just isn’t true, assuming he stays healthy.

As for Willie, some people sure are convinced he’ll be replaced with an upgrade, which is something you should not be convinced of given this team’s history. Are there coaches out there better than Willie? Yes. Will the Pels hire those coaches. History says no. At best they’ll pick another flavor of average and start the cycle all over again.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 6:31 am
Posted by saintslsupels
Member since Jul 2014
1798 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:00 am to
Got nba players to pass the ball, play hard on defense, and built a culture and locker room where everyone seems to generally care about each other.

Do you have any idea how hard that is in the nba?
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
40150 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:44 am to
quote:

For instance, people act like BI will become an untradeable player on his next deal and that just isn’t true, assuming he stays healthy.


No one is saying he's untradable. People are saying that if you dont sell high now, you are costing yourself in the future.

You simply cannot pay BI 55 million a year and think this is the best way forward. To put it into even more perspective, IF he was worth that, why people havent been falling over themselves to try and obtain him. (HINT: The NBA doesnt think he's a #1 option either)


Also on the topic of WG, he may be Top 3 in worse coach in the league. He has done absolutely nothing in terms of growth and from whats been said, he doesn't even control a majority of the inner workings of this team. However, the most egregious thing he has done is allowed BI and bros to run unapposed while treating Zion/Trey/Hawk the complete opposite.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 7:47 am
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61571 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:56 am to
quote:

No one is saying he's untradable.


I don’t think you realize how intense y’all are coming across with the BI hate.

quote:

People are saying that if you dont sell high now, you are costing yourself in the future.


The same people that thought Scoot was the right pivot to make to save that future. I’m not doing an “I’m right, you’re wrong” here, I’m on the trade BI train too, I’m just saying our powers of prognostication aren’t as good as we tend to think, so maybe the consequences of not trading BI aren’t as dire as you believe.

The reason I’m ok trading BI is because he needs to be the #2, not the #1. But if Zion grows up and takes the #1 spot from him, or a coaching change to someone that isn’t as Ingram biased as Willie happens, I do wonder if things would magically get better, just like CJ last year when he was forced into a role he shouldn’t have had, vs CJ this year where he is playing his projected role perfectly.
Posted by ThePistol
Lafayette, LA
Member since Mar 2007
1529 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:57 am to
quote:

people act like BI will become an untradeable player on his next deal and that just isn’t true


No one is untradeable, but he will definitely be a negative asset if he gets another max contract.
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8440 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 8:12 am to
Our defense has been top 10 in the league this year and last despite the fact we start 4 average or worse defenders. Idk how you explain that except as good coaching.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61571 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 8:26 am to
quote:

No one is untradeable, but he will definitely be a negative asset if he gets another max contract.


Will he have more value today than a year from now? Yes. But he won't be a negative asset assuming he stays healthy.

People said the same thing about CJ, in fact he was widely viewed as a negative contract, yet there was a bidding war for him and he still got a 1st for Portland despite being a "negative asset". I would like to equate BI on his next contract to Zach Lavine, who's basically a year ahead of BI in the contract cycle and just got the extension everyone doesn't want to give BI. Lavine probably could have gotten a few 1sts and a young player or 2 if traded, but Lavine's injuries keep tanking his value.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 8:28 am
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
40150 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 9:18 am to
quote:

The same people that thought Scoot was the right pivot to make to save that future. I’m not doing an “I’m right, you’re wrong” here, I’m on the trade BI train too, I’m just saying our powers of prognostication aren’t as good as we tend to think, so maybe the consequences of not trading BI aren’t as dire as you believe.


Sunk Cost Fallacy

Definite: the phenomenon whereby a person is reluctant to abandon a strategy or course of action because they have invested heavily in it, even when it is clear that abandonment would be more beneficial.
"the sunk-cost fallacy creeps into a lot of major financial decisions"


In the 8 years BI has been in the NBA he has amassed:

1 All Star Appearance

That's it.

The negatives with BI:

- Paying him 55 Million secures the Pelicans being dog shite for a minimum 5 years.

- He in 5 years as a Pelican, flat out refuses to change his shot selection even after someone with more cache (CJ McCollum) has literally done that in a year. Even after folks including myself absolutely shitted on him for playing outside his role.

- He does not pair well with Zion, and anyone who thinks his ceiling is higher than Zion's needs their head examined.

- He is no leader and pretty much runs the front office. So I dont expect him to leave NOLA. I do however expect the same song and dance from a few of you when we fail to meet the mediocre expectations we set every year then ask why we didnt make it.

- He ran off SVG which for the Zion era, was Zion's best coach. Why? Because he didn't like Point Zion due to him being a ball dominant wing and certified ball hog.

- I need to find the stat but were like 4-17 or some shite when BI shoots the ball more than 12 times.


Dont confuse known facts for hate, nor be shocked some folks want him gone.

Anyways this is a WG thread. Ill have my BI Thread up after we dont do anything Thursday
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
22782 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 9:37 am to
quote:

He does not pair well with Zion


This may be a topic for another thread, but why is this?

I'm not saying I disagree, but early in the season, there were some games where they looked unstoppable together. I'm just trying to understand.

Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
40150 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 9:52 am to
quote:

This may be a topic for another thread, but why is this?

I'm not saying I disagree, but early in the season, there were some games where they looked unstoppable together. I'm just trying to understand.


Boreggo had more say early on. You barely see his offense now outside of the Utah game when it was clearly on display.

Another game to watch would be the Nuggest IST game where they were running every screen in the book to get shooters open.

Not to mention, again BI has not changed his shot selection and dislikes Point Zion. We also for some reason have consistently done away from ZIon / BI PnR, which again is another coaching issue.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111109 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

This board is tiresome at times.

No new ground is being broken anymore. It's just old topics masked as new topics.

Yea, my Pels Talk immersion levels have waned a lot recently.


ETA: LOL at me making 5 straight posts after saying this
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 11:05 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111109 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:58 am to
quote:

For instance, people act like BI will become an untradeable player on his next deal and that just isn’t true, assuming he stays healthy.

The moment he signs the next max, he is a negative value contract.

We see it happen over and over and over on players of BI's ilk in this league. Beal being I believe the most recent example.

Not untraceable, but 100% a negative value contract.


We should not give out a negative value contract as our biggest contract. Name all the teams that had wild success doing something like that.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111109 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 11:01 am to
quote:

But he won't be a negative asset assuming he stays healthy.
He's not a negative asset 1 year from now.

He's a negative asset the moment he signs a new max deal.
quote:

People said the same thing about CJ, in fact he was widely viewed as a negative contract, yet there was a bidding war for him and he still got a 1st for Portland despite being a "negative asset".
It was always understood that CJ would net something of value in return.

The question was how much. And the only CJ/negative asset discussion I recall was his extension, not during his trade.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111109 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

This may be a topic for another thread, but why is this?

I'm not saying I disagree, but early in the season, there were some games where they looked unstoppable together. I'm just trying to understand.
From a higher level, think about it this way.

Neither like to shoot the 3. Neither really like to play defense.


Now think about all the top 2 stars on good teams over the years. How many have that same profile of not shooting the 3 and not being legit good on defense? I'm not sure there's a single duo that could be named that also had big time success.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111109 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Boreggo had more say early on. You barely see his offense now outside of the Utah game when it was clearly on display.

Willie abandoned Borrego Ball early in the season because BI didn't like it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram