Started By
Message

Ferry Impact: sign Bazemore v find the next Bazemore

Posted on 6/8/16 at 6:29 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115739 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 6:29 pm
Lots of speculation out there that the Pelicans will pursue Bazemore in FA as Ferry was a huge, huge Bazemore proponent.

On the flip side, many are saying they think it's more likely that Ferry will prefer to find low risk, cheap signings and "find" the next guy like that.

I think Baze is more of a question of how we attack FA.

So, what's the more likely approach? What impact could Ferry have on the FA approach?
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10388 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 6:45 pm to
If he is still working for the Hawks, I don't really see him making an impact on the players we sign or players we go after.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115739 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 6:46 pm to
Well, he's not working for the Hawks.
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

If he is still working for the Hawks, I don't really see him making an impact on the players we sign or players we go after.




Ah, you might want to check the thread right below this one.
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 6:49 pm
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10388 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 6:51 pm to
Shows what I know.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115739 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 6:54 pm to
It happens.
Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 7:35 pm to
More Harklessan athletic young guy who has shown flashes. He basically like Bazemore on the Warriors.
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 8:38 pm
Posted by oVo
Member since Dec 2013
11802 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 8:09 pm to
Would want
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61492 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 8:37 pm to
I have mixed feelings about Bazemore. He's got the same tweener deficiency as QPon. If we're in the playoffs against a team with a big SF you probably have to play Cunningham or someone like Dudley if you sign him. Throw drafting Buddy into the mix and you could end up with 2 of Hield/QPon/Bazemore sitting on the bench for much of the game. Is that too much duplication or a good problem to have? Because the small ball lineup would be pretty potent. Jrue/QPon/Bazemore/Dudley/AD and you'd still have Hield to swap in.

Regarding the original question of do they go with knowns or unknowns, guys like Carroll weren't exactly unknown, in fact MM pointed him out as a guy to target. So I think it all depends on what Ferry sees as available in the bargain bin. If he sees players ready to bloom you have to go the cheap route. Not only is it the smart thing to do, those guys are usually more hungry.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52606 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 9:23 pm to
Yeah I'm not overpaying for a guy like bazemore would rather someone I know will put up consistent number for a smaller salary
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:11 pm to
Anybody that you KNOW will put up numbers will get a bigger salary though. Literally any semi known product is gonna get a salary that makes you say, "What??!!" this summer

So, you either pay 10+ mil for the known thing or take a gamble on unknowns like a Brandon Rush type and hope you hit. You aren't getting a known AND value
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52606 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:13 pm to
Isn't bazemore looking for a max deal? Like 12-15 mil a year?
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11900 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Anybody that you KNOW will put up numbers will get a bigger salary though. Literally any semi known product is gonna get a salary that makes you say, "What??!!" this summer So, you either pay 10+ mil for the known thing or take a gamble on unknowns like a Brandon Rush type and hope you hit. You aren't getting a known AND value
I wouldn't consider Bazemore a "known thing."
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:41 pm to
I tend to agree. The guy I was responding to said he would pass on Bazemore and get a known thing for less

My whole point was that known guys won't get less than a guy who might not even be a known thing themselves

I know we say it all the time, but people really have to readjust prices. Not only will the cap be higher but with shorter contracts in this CBA, there will be more free agents every year.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32445 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

Isn't bazemore looking for a max deal? Like 12-15 mil a year?



A max deal is a lot more than 12-15 per year.

He isn't going to get a max deal (his max is 21 mil or so, unless he's been in the league longer than I think.)
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49512 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:07 pm to
I would be totally fine with signing Bazemore to $10-11m/yr. Hopefully Ferry can improve our chances. Very good defender (13th in the NBA in DRtg and 18th in defensive win shares). Competent 3pt shooter. He'd be a great pickup. Plus I'm biased towards southpaws.

Only issue I have has been mentioned before: he's undersized for a 3. If we went with Bender in the draft to pair with AD in finishing lineups, that could be compensated for a bit. Have to worry about him switching on to 4's, though.
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 11:13 pm
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:52 pm to
I just have a had time recalling the scrappy, try hard player who came out of nowhere, signed a big contract and then outplayed it. AT BEST, he plays at or near the value at his deal.

I'd rather take that same money, throw it at 3 hungry guys and let them fight it out like the mob members with the pool sticks in the Dark Knight. Either thrive or you are likely out of the league

I want hungry guys. I want the next Demarre or Bazemore, not ones who fought and clawed and now are going to be rewarded with a huge check, so they don't have to be as hungry anymore. It's not like their talent is transcendent, it's their hunger that helped them take that next step. Start feeding them well, and they are right back to being that same marginally talented player nobody wanted prior to being given the opportunity
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278385 posts
Posted on 6/9/16 at 12:14 am to
quote:

I want hungry guys. I want the next Demarre or Bazemore, not ones who fought and clawed and now are going to be rewarded with a huge check, so they don't have to be as hungry anymore. It's not like their talent is transcendent, it's their hunger that helped them take that next step. Start feeding them well, and they are right back to being that same marginally talented player nobody wanted prior to being given the opportunity



Posted by Silverfoxx
Member since Mar 2016
880 posts
Posted on 6/9/16 at 12:31 am to
Agreed
Posted by novowels
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2008
2400 posts
Posted on 6/9/16 at 6:41 am to
quote:

I would be totally fine with signing Bazemore to $10-11m/yr.


Everyone would. The problem is I think you're going to see his value rise to the $15m+ range
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram