- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Buddy Hield and his progression
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:08 am to ShamelessPel
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:08 am to ShamelessPel
quote:
player's strength
which is catch and shoot
Spot Up PPP- 1.10 77th% (30% of his possessions). how dare a coach maximize the indisputable best attribute of Buddy Hield. what a fricking moron right?
every observer (paid and unpaid) has watched Hield and commented on his ball handling/creating needing to improve. except you. but yes- turn him into Jamal Crawford by just giving him the ball. brilliant- how did no one else think of that?
that you think Hield has anything close to Crawford's handles or quickness is embarrassing for you
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 11:10 am
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:21 am to corndeaux
We're a year removed from a magical NCAA season and an offseason where this guy was torching team records in workouts.
The fallacy in your argument is the pure lack of ball handlers in your scenario available on this team. Who would you say, if they had to go one on one and break a player down, is better than Buddy on this team? Jrue/Evans/Davis/MAYBE Frazier who's a cerebral probe player and not a blow by you type.
Yeah, Buddy can improve on handles and more than that, learning to finish at the rim/draw fouls. Dudes a marginal at best NBA player right now, actually just bad without the rookie scale. I'd like to at least see him with a longer leash to see if it's the NBA level or him in his own head. Empower him. Jesus. This is a guy who was getting doubled in the tourney and almost single handedly willing his team to a Final 4. He's not nearly the disaster you paint him to be as a ball handler.
ETA: this is where the Murray argument comes in for me. Has nothing to do with raw skills. It has to do with him being moldable. You draft Buddy to put the ball in the damn basket. Let him grow naturally with the NBA game. Not try to break the kid down to square 1 and build it back up. Why do that to a runaway Naismith winner putting up just incredible splits in college despite most teams' strategy for Okie being "STOP BUDDY". Go with the much younger kid with nice raw splits himself if that's your goal.
I'm also intentionally staying away from your Crawford bait. At no point did I equate their handles or skill level. You're putting words in my mouth to frame my argument as moronic. I said I wanted him to have more autonomy with the 2nd unit and be more of a focal point. Games without Evans make particular sense to me.
The fallacy in your argument is the pure lack of ball handlers in your scenario available on this team. Who would you say, if they had to go one on one and break a player down, is better than Buddy on this team? Jrue/Evans/Davis/MAYBE Frazier who's a cerebral probe player and not a blow by you type.
Yeah, Buddy can improve on handles and more than that, learning to finish at the rim/draw fouls. Dudes a marginal at best NBA player right now, actually just bad without the rookie scale. I'd like to at least see him with a longer leash to see if it's the NBA level or him in his own head. Empower him. Jesus. This is a guy who was getting doubled in the tourney and almost single handedly willing his team to a Final 4. He's not nearly the disaster you paint him to be as a ball handler.
ETA: this is where the Murray argument comes in for me. Has nothing to do with raw skills. It has to do with him being moldable. You draft Buddy to put the ball in the damn basket. Let him grow naturally with the NBA game. Not try to break the kid down to square 1 and build it back up. Why do that to a runaway Naismith winner putting up just incredible splits in college despite most teams' strategy for Okie being "STOP BUDDY". Go with the much younger kid with nice raw splits himself if that's your goal.
I'm also intentionally staying away from your Crawford bait. At no point did I equate their handles or skill level. You're putting words in my mouth to frame my argument as moronic. I said I wanted him to have more autonomy with the 2nd unit and be more of a focal point. Games without Evans make particular sense to me.
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 11:36 am
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:33 am to ShamelessPel
Buddy is a rookie and people are hugely overreacting.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:45 am to Colonel Flagg
quote:
Buddy is a rookie and people are hugely overreacting
There is truth here but this fanbase is generally tired of these throwaway seasons with nothing to show. Buddy's regressed. Team's regressed. Diallo is in D-League. Demps controls our pick so we're on the edge of our seats waiting for him to f*** it up. Loomis admitted he doesn't GAF. It's a joke. This is Shinn era bad minus the green light to spend money...very poorly thank you Dell. It'd be nice to either 1) have competent people making decisions and playing after 82 or 2) have at bare minimum a coach who can play and experiment for next year without worrying about his job.
My parents are getting up in age. We have good seats in balcony. It's what I do with them to spend time with them as their son. I'd sure like them to get rewarded with some competitive fricking basketball.
ETA: shite I'd take rookies and guys to root for playing meaningless competitive bball. The MT5 and DC year was the most fun we've had outside of 07-08. Who was the coach that year? Jeff fricking Bower. What did he do? Nothing. Let ballers be ballers. I have witnessed first hand that empowering rookies has helped them develop. And Hield is Thornton on steroids.
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 11:52 am
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:33 pm to ShamelessPel
quote:
You draft Buddy to put the ball in the damn basket. Let him grow naturally with the NBA game
which is what it looks like they are trying to do.
his best skill is shooting. they try to put him in spots to let him shoot. his weakness is in creating off the bounce v longer, quicker, smarter, better defenders. they limit him there.
i get the impulse to want more. but what he did in college is irrelevant now. it doesnt always translate. forcing him to do things he hasn't shown much success with at the NBA level (yet) doesnt feel very natural to me.
and not entirely bait w/ Crawford. you want that role for him, great. but Crawford's role has a very specific context that relies on his skillset for success. it's like saying i want Asik to play the Gobert role on defense.
finally- there are plenty of criticisms of the coaching. im not here to tell anyone otherwise. on the whole, i think they've done fine with Hield this year. should they be playing him 25mp+ every night now? yes. but otherwise, he's been fine. he's a rookie. let him work on the weaknesses this summer and let's see how he comes back next fall
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:48 pm to corndeaux
quote:
i get the impulse to want more. but what he did in college is irrelevant now. it doesnt always translate. forcing him to do things he hasn't shown much success with at the NBA level (yet) doesnt feel very natural to me.
I framed the rationale in a later post. If we had proven quality coaching I'd be more inclined to trust the process. We don't so I'd rather jumpstart Hield at this level by putting him in roles he's comfortable in AS WELL as roles he's uncomfortable in. You saw it last game with him running the show in spurts. He needs very little room to get a comfortable shot off using screens. He's capable of pumping and stepping into the midrange. Buddy is a weird case. If you pay attention (I'm sure you've noticed this as well), you can almost tell the second it leaves his hand if it's going in. He's either pushing and leaning into the shot or relaxed and shooting normally. It's kind of weird you'd expect a player to lean back for extra space. I'm glad he hasn't developed that habit.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 10:43 pm to TigerinPurgatory
I've had enough of buddy hield. He is a garbage player and now hes a fig for grabbing cousins nuts. We should sell now while he still has a glimpse of value. absolutely garbage.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:26 pm to TPecoraro23
quote:
I've had enough of buddy hield. He is a garbage player and now hes a fig for grabbing cousins nuts. We should sell now while he still has a glimpse of value. absolutely garbage.
Go watch the game again you reactionary count-hair.
Almost every guard was wrapping Cousins on the screen and switch. Including Buddy every single possession he was on him prior(and no other big). It happened, it clearly was not intentional as it was some sort of strategy. You could tell by the sheer casualness Buddy and the rest of the team treated the foul when it happened and the shock of everyone when the ruling came down.
If Buddy had been nut checking people in college ala CP3, I would think differently on the intent. But this is a kid with literally no history of conduct like this.
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 11:31 pm
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:47 pm to NOLA Bronco
That post was almost as garbage as your profile pic
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:32 am to TPecoraro23
quote:
That post was almost as garbage as your profile pic
Seems like you only show up to shite on Buddy when he has down moments, you a fan of the Pelicans? Or just a jilted wanna-be-lover, upset and unable to let it go that Buddy wouldn't grab you like Cousins?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 5:33 am to TPecoraro23
Even if Buddy was actually gay why would you care? It has absolutely zero effect on your life. That should be the last thing you worry about.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 8:03 am to tgr4ever
Honestly, I'd love to walk up to TPecker and grab him by the junk just to watch his existential crisis unfold in real time.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:54 am to jprdbulldog20
That is one of the funniest things I've ever seen.
still trying to grab nuts , and Ajinca's creeping arse in the back ground looks like Charlie Murphy from the Real World skit on Chappelle.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:01 am to TeddyPadillac
Yes its funny, but this is the kind of bullshite David Wesley was talking about last week. There is zero accountability or discipline on this team. Great idea to post this picture after a loss to the Kings. Team is just way too lax all the time. This crap wouldn't fly with a good coach.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:03 am to tigerbait44
quote:
Great idea to post this picture after a loss to the Kings. Team is just way too lax all the time. This crap wouldn't fly with a good coach.
Fans seem to think that you're supposed to be pissed off and brooding for a significant amount of time after a loss, yet most coaches talk about moving on to get ready for the next game. Shenanigans after a game = moving on. Shenanigans before a game = maybe you're not as serious as you should be.
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 11:04 am
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:42 am to tigerbait44
quote:
Yes its funny, but this is the kind of bullshite David Wesley was talking about last week. There is zero accountability or discipline on this team. Great idea to post this picture after a loss to the Kings. Team is just way too lax all the time. This crap wouldn't fly with a good coach.
I'm all for the get mad when you lose stuff and all, but when you lose 50 games last year, and will lose 50 again this year, what are you supposed to do, be mad all the time? The Warriors and Spurs and Cavs have a right to be mad everytime they lose, not a team that will lose 50+ games.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News