- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: who is considered the greatest/biggest movie star of all time?
Posted on 5/28/14 at 10:51 am to Feral
Posted on 5/28/14 at 10:51 am to Feral
quote:
While he probably isnt, John Cazale deserves recognition. You all know him as the guy who played Fredo Corleone, but he only starred/co-starred in 5 films, and all of them were nominated for Best Picture.
He deserves no recognition at all as one of the "greatest movie stars of all time."
quote:
The guy was one of the greatest actors of his generation and went far too soon.
Has nothing to do with the discussion.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 10:57 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Nobody was talking about "acting" or "greatest actress" in this thread. The character actors tend to wipe the floor with the leads in that discussion.
We're talking "movie star" - "film star" - however you want to qualify it - and Marilyn is probably it on the female side. Were Kate and Audrey Hepburn big stars? Yes. Were they great actresses? Kate was, Audrey was okay - I wouldn't say great. Is Meryl Streep a great actress? Certainly. Is she one of the greatest movie stars of all time? Certainly not.
Okay, so by that definition, Lindsay Lohan is one of the biggest movie stars of the last decade.
The "movie star v. actor/actress" hair splitting goes off the rails quickly when you start talking about star power. Yes, I understand there's a difference when you're comparing John Wayne to Humphrey Bogart, but there's a line there. I'm not kidding when I say that you can go ask most Marilyn Monroe adorers what their favorite movie of hers was and they'll be stupefied. My wife worships MM and had never even heard of The Seven Year Itch until I made her watch it a few years ago.
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 10:58 am
Posted on 5/28/14 at 10:58 am to Peazey
quote:
Has nothing to do with the discussion.
I forgot the part about where this was a courtroom and not a message board.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 11:03 am to Feral
quote:
I say that you can go ask most Marilyn Monroe adorers what their favorite movie of hers was and they'll be stupefied.
And I agree that the "multimedia" star category can overlap - to a significant degree and muddy the waters quite a bit. Marilyn was not a great actress, or even a particularly serviceable one at times, but when she was on, she made the movie.
Lindsay Lohan showed some promise as a child star - so it is fair to bring her up, but she is nowhere in the same league as Monroe, Sophia Loren, Elizabeth Taylor, and the list go could on for days.
"Star power" tends to drive movie sales, more than acting ability - we tend to "discover" those great performances in hindsight - although they occasionally intersect - Hanks, for all of his goofy, regular guy charm (Jimmy Stewart, anyone?) - has logged some very good acting performances for a, primarily, leading man. But people go to see his films because he's a brand - as is Cruise, as was John Wayne - even Eastwood, to a degree, particularly from the Sergio Leone films, through the Every Which Way But Loose era.
That's where "star power" and "acting" divert.
And this thread is about movie stars - of which the Golden Age of Hollywood will likely dominate forever. There just aren't Clark Gables, Cary Grants, John Waynes, Jimmy Stewarts, or, for that matter, Marilyn Monroes (although they all try - don't believe me, watch Madonna's Material Girl video) any more.
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 11:05 am
Posted on 5/28/14 at 11:15 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
If Marilyn isn't #1 female movie star (NOT ACTRESS) - of all time, who is? One of the Hepburns? Bette Davis? Garbo?
Judy Garland? Not sure how huge she actually was though, she sure like to hang out with the guys!
Posted on 5/28/14 at 11:18 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Judy Garland?
Not hardly. She's not in the same league with Kate, Audrey or Bette - probably behind Garbo,too.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 11:26 am to Ace Midnight
Lucille Ball?
Shirley Temple?
Jerry Lewis?
I guess it all depends on the criteria or your frame of reference.
Shirley Temple?
Jerry Lewis?
I guess it all depends on the criteria or your frame of reference.
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 11:33 am
Posted on 5/28/14 at 11:33 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Lucille Ball?
Shirley Temple?
biggest tv start of all time, biggest child star of all time. not biggest movie stars of all time.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 12:40 pm to 632627
Ronald Reagan got pretty big
Posted on 5/28/14 at 12:45 pm to Feral
quote:
I forgot the part about where this was a courtroom and not a message board.
No, you forgot the subject of the conversation.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 12:51 pm to 632627
So little support for Chaplin:
LINK
quote:
During 1915, Chaplin became a cultural phenomenon. Shops were stocked with Chaplin merchandise, he was featured in cartoons and comic strips, and several songs were written about him.[86] In July, a journalist for Motion Picture Magazine wrote that "Chaplinitis" had spread across America.[87] As his fame grew worldwide, he became the film industry's first international star.[88] When the Essanay contract ended in December 1915,[89][note 9] Chaplin – fully aware of his popularity – requested a $150,000 signing bonus from his next studio. He received several offers, including Universal, Fox, and Vitagraph, the best of which came from the Mutual Film Corporation at $10,000 a week.[91]
quote:
A contract was negotiated with Mutual that amounted to $670,000 a year, which Robinson says made Chaplin – at 26 years old – one of the highest paid people in the world.[92] The high salary shocked the public and was widely reported in the press.[93] John R. Freuler, the studio President, explained, "We can afford to pay Mr. Chaplin this large sum annually because the public wants Chaplin and will pay for him."[94]
Mutual gave Chaplin his own Los Angeles studio to work in, which opened in March 1916.[
quote:
and his popularity continued to grow worldwide. Harper's Weekly reported that the name of Charlie Chaplin was "a part of the common language of almost every country", and that the Tramp image was "universally familiar".[107] In 1917, professional Chaplin imitators were so widespread that he took legal action,[108] and it was reported that nine out of ten men who attended costume parties dressed as the Tramp.[109] The same year, a study by the Boston Society for Psychical Research concluded that Chaplin was "an American obsession."[109] The actress Minnie Maddern Fiske wrote that "a constantly increasing body of cultured, artistic people are beginning to regard the young English buffoon, Charles Chaplin, as an extraordinary artist, as well as a comic genius."
quote:
One journalist wrote, "Nobody in the world but Charlie Chaplin could have done it. He is the only person that has that peculiar something called 'audience appeal' in sufficient quality to defy the popular penchant for movies that talk."[
quote:
In 1998, the film critic Andrew Sarris called Chaplin "arguably the single most important artist produced by the cinema, certainly its most extraordinary performer and probably still its most universal icon".[403] He is described by the British Film Institute as "a towering figure in world culture",[404] and was included in TIME magazine's list of the "100 Most Important People of the 20th Century" for the "laughter [he brought] to millions" and because he "more or less invented global recognizability and helped turn an industry into an art".[405]
The image of the Tramp has become a part of cultural history;[406] according to Simon Louvish, the character is recognisable to people who have never seen a Chaplin film, and in places where his films are never shown.[407] The critic Leonard Maltin has written of the "unique" and "indelible" nature of the Tramp, and argued that no other comedian matched his "worldwide impact".[408] Praising the character, Richard Schickel suggests that Chaplin's films with the Tramp contain the most "eloquent, richly comedic expressions of the human spirit" in movie history.[409] Memorabilia connected to the character still fetches large sums in auctions: in 2006 a bowler hat and a bamboo cane that were part of the Tramp's costume were bought for $140,000 in a Los Angeles auction.[410]
As a filmmaker, Chaplin is considered a pioneer and one of the most influential figures of the early twentieth century.[1] He is often credited as one of the medium's first artists.[411] Film historian Mark Cousins has written that Chaplin "changed not only the imagery of cinema, but also its sociology and grammar" and claims that Chaplin was as important to the development of comedy as a genre as D.W. Griffith was to drama.[412] He was the first to popularise feature-length comedy and to slow down the pace of action, adding pathos and subtlety to it.[413][414] Although his work is mostly classified as slapstick, Chaplin's drama A Woman of Paris (1923) was a major influence on Ernst Lubitsch's film The Marriage Circle (1924) and thus played a part in the development of "sophisticated comedy".[415] According to David Robinson, Chaplin's innovations were "rapidly assimilated to become part of the common practice of film craft."[416] Filmmakers who cited Chaplin as an influence include Federico Fellini (who called Chaplin "a sort of Adam, from whom we are all descended"),[329] Jacques Tati ("Without him I would never have made a film"),[329] René Clair ("He inspired practically every filmmaker"),[328] Michael Powell,[417] Billy Wilder,[418] and Richard Attenborough.[419] Andrei Tarkovsky praised Chaplin as "the only person to have gone down into cinematic history without any shadow of a doubt. The films he left behind can never grow old."
LINK
Posted on 5/28/14 at 1:23 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
So little support for Chaplin:
Part of it was the era - D.W. Griffith barely gets mentioned when it comes to great directors or auteurs.
But, fair enough Chaplin, Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks should have gotten more play in this thread as reps of that era.
(ETA: And I inadvertently named all 4 of the founding stars - and only those 4 - of United Artists in this post - I may be smarter than even I realize. I left out the lawyer who held the 5th 20% chunk at founding.)
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 5/28/14 at 1:31 pm to Ace Midnight
In no particular order:
John Wayne
Humphrey Bogart
Marlon Brando
Clark Gable
Jimmy Stewart
John Wayne
Humphrey Bogart
Marlon Brando
Clark Gable
Jimmy Stewart
Posted on 5/28/14 at 1:37 pm to Peazey
quote:
No, you forgot the subject of the conversation.
No, I ventured off topic.
You mad?
Posted on 5/28/14 at 2:05 pm to Jamohn
quote:
I just don't see Monroe as much of a movie star.
Are you serious? Marilyn is the epitome of a "movie star." She was even banging the president of the United States!
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 5/28/14 at 2:41 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
So Monica Lewinsky is a movie star?
Did you not read the rest of my post?
Did you not read the rest of my post?
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:16 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
This is tough because of time, modern media saturation, dilution (modern stars simply don't have the cachet of a Cary Grant or Frank Sinatra, for example - and can't achieve it, regardless of what they do).
I agree to the extent that you almost have to break down what constitutes a "movie star" before and after the introduction of internet/social media. Stars from the golden age were really only known outside of Hollywood when fans saw them in a movie, thus, they seemed bigger than life. Stars today are known more for their off-screen antics, politics, talk shows, etc... than they are for their actual work. It's really more of a movie star vs. celebrity comparison when you start trying to consider how actors from different eras rate against each other.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:33 pm to Feral
quote:
Feral
You keep saying people today don't know Marilyn's filmography, but the title of this entire thread says "all time". Nothing about our current views on stars. The fact that she is that famous without some of her fans ever seeing one of her films is a further testament to her stardom. She transcended the medium. Obviously, the Marilyn mystique has grown since her death, but she was already an icon at the time. She was (allegedly) having an affair with the President. Does it get much bigger than that?
To compare Lindsey Lohan to her is absurd.
I also like the suggestion of Chaplin and I think with him, John Wayne, and Marilyn that is a pretty solid top three.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News