Started By
Message

When did FOX become BET all of a sudden?

Posted on 12/11/16 at 2:33 pm
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 2:33 pm
I used to work at a FOX affiliate and the programming director there sent me an email the other day asking this question.

Ever since Empire succeeded for them its been a non stop stream of new shows based around blacks.

Empire
Rosewood
Minority Report
Stars
Pitch
Shots Fired

It's funny because when I worked at this FOX Affiliate it was in a market that was 97% white and Empire got 0 ratings every week. Yet we would get these email blasts from FOX pimping how great Empire was doing. 80% of the audience was black which explained why we got zero ratings for it. Our sales managers hated that show because it was dead weight.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
27746 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 2:43 pm to
I work in the media biz as well and around when Empire came out there was a big article that i read saying that network local TV(the big 4) has shifted more to minorities and thats why you saw a huge increase in minority shows like Fresh of the boat, blackish, etc.

They said the traditional mid/upper income white viewer has migrated over to premium channels like FX, AMC, HBO, and things like Netflix and Amazon Prime. It was interesting but it made sense.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22789 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:09 pm to
The theory have some merit, but you're still catering your network to 10-12% of the population and your market....just not a smart move. There are still more poor and rural whites than the total of blacks ...it's not even close....it just seem like you're purposely eliminating your mass audience..
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:09 pm to
I've heard that same reasoning for why ESPN has taken a hard left bend and promoting the likes of Jemele Hill more. Because they need new audiences with the cord cutting so they think pandering to minorities with left wing personalities and programming is the way to go.

The problem is that ratings for a lot of these shows suck. Blackish is by far the worst performing show on that ABC Wednesday Night Block. Fresh Off the Boat did good at first but has kind of evened out. Empire is 100% carried by black audiences so markets with low black populations have to suffer.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22789 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:19 pm to
Seems like an extreme panic move...ESPN is hemmorhaging subscribers because of it too...I was a loyal PTI viewer for 15 yrs but I haven't watched an episode for 3 months now...never will again and I never watch 1 minute of anything ESPN broadcasts now except the last 20 minutes of college game day and Live events.

Also those shows like empire seem to really be flash in the pan type shows too. They have lots of hype and ratings for like a half a year and then they peter out. Look at CBS, they have very little black centric shows and they do big ratings because of old people and white folks who like corny old style sitcoms. It's not flashy. But it makes them #1 and lots of cash. These shows are also massively appealing to international syndication, which of course is mostly white or Asian.
This post was edited on 12/11/16 at 3:21 pm
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:50 pm to
The problem with CBS is that too many advertisers want to reach millenials and younger audiences these days, and while CBS is the #1 network, most of its audience is old. The same can be said for basically all of broadcast outside of FOX. FOX is the youngest skewing network, perhaps this also explains why they are putting out so many of these shows

Don't get why advertisers are so gung ho on advertising to millenials however. I was working on a project at work the other day where the buyer was insisting on targetting the Millenial Demographic. The client was a fricking RV dealer. I told them you can target millenials all you want but it doesn't make any sense. It's not a demographic who is in the market for an RV.
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4588 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Ever since Empire succeeded for them its been a non stop stream of new shows based around blacks. Empire Rosewood Minority Report Stars Pitch Shots Fired



Let me guess....you're not a racist and even have "black friends".

I knew Minority Report was a follow up to the Tom Cruise movie....looked it up on IMDB and the "top stars" are one black female and three white guys.

Rosewood looks likes it's a
Quincy knockoff. (Where the lead happens to be black)

Pitch is about the first female baseball player (who happens to be black)

So is it wrong to have a "regular" show where the lead character just happens to be black?

Ok, so Shots fired looks like it's going to be focused on a crime with racial issues involved, and Empire I guess is about a music executive in a genre that is primarily Black....but who dreaming cares! If you don't like the show, don't watch!

I mean, should men be upset that "The Good Wife", Greys Anatomy, madam secretary or Desperate Housewives is on and are focused about women????
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12128 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

They said the traditional mid/upper income white viewer has migrated over to premium channels like FX, AMC, HBO, and things like Netflix and Amazon Prime. It was interesting but it made sense.


I would guess a lot of that is because the premium channels are pumping out very high quality programming that is intelligent and well acted. FOX wants to pump out cheap shows and for the most part those aren't catching on like they used to. Look at CBS in the same light, most of their cheap shows are established where people are kind of "pot committed" to the show at this point but they don't pick up a lot of new viewers (looking at Big Bang and Two Broke Girls).
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39211 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:18 pm to
Diversity is good and you're racist if you disagree.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22789 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:23 pm to
I think advertisers are still so hung up on the old trope that "young people buy things." Do they not understand that everybody under 30 basically still lives at home and mooch off their parents now. I used to work at a University... The overwhelming majority are absolutely clueless about how anything in th real world actually works. If they need anything, they have to call their parents first and usually they get them to do it for them.

They use their HBO passwords and their Netflix acct. They use parents credit cards, etc etc

Nobody in their 20s makes any money... Especially enough to be buying leisure products like RVs and houses and motorcycles or boats.

Old people have money, young people don't... That's always been so, but now even more than ever.

Outside of technology and gadgets "millenials" (Damn I hate that term) don't have consumer habits like anyone of the last 100 yrs... They'd rather stay in their room and watch YouTube videos and tweet than go out and watch a movie in a theater or go to a ball game. Some still do, but it's vastly smaller than previous generations.
This post was edited on 12/11/16 at 4:25 pm
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155694 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:24 pm to
Doyle is killing it with Empire.
Posted by hugo_boss
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2012
990 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:25 pm to
I agree. If the thing that stands out to you is dang there sure are a lot of black people on tv, then you're probably racist. I don't watch any of those shows but I never thought of the casts' race, they're just bad shows.
Posted by Mayfair2Pville
Member since Jul 2013
444 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:27 pm to
FOX always had shows that appealed to urban audiences... Back in the day Martin, Living Singles,In Living Color, Etc...
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4588 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Diversity is good and you're racist if you disagree.


That in no way is indicative of my comments or his original statement.

He is saying that "fox is becoming BET" because they happen to have three shows with predominately black casts and three others that simply happen to have a black actor in a lead role.


He's not saying that show X is adding characters to promote some concept of diversity, or the premise of these shows are based on promoting "diversity"


Posted by JagHammer
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
267 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:37 pm to
I guess no one watched Fox in its' early years. Shows like In Living Color and Martin helped keep the network afloat,along with the Simpsons and BH90210.
Posted by HeLeakin
Member since May 2014
3312 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:53 pm to
UPN had multiple black dominated shows back in the day. Did you bitch about that too?
Posted by BigAppleTiger
New York City
Member since Dec 2008
10384 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 5:04 pm to
Empire is 100% carried by black audiences so markets with low black populations have to suffer.



This is the kind of hyperbole which just makes you look ridiculous. So white audiences are "suffering" because there is a show on a network which they don't have to watch. Holy shite...we are fricked.
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49517 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 5:08 pm to
Pretty sure he was speaking financially. If you own a Fox affiliate in, say, Rhode Island, you're not going to be able to sell local commercials for much money.
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

I think advertisers are still so hung up on the old trope that "young people buy things." Do they not understand that everybody under 30 basically still lives at home and mooch off their parents now. I used to work at a University... The overwhelming majority are absolutely clueless about how anything in th real world actually works. If they need anything, they have to call their parents first and usually they get them to do it for them.


You're right. I heard Rush Limbaugh I think say the reason advertisers want Adults 25-54 or younger demos opposed to older ones isn't because they have the money, but because their minds aren't made up. Old people already have their minds made up and preferred brands, so advertising to them may not be effective.

I see his point but at the same time I get frustrated at work when we get projects for advertisers who want to target demos that make no sense. RV dealer wanting to target millenials and a charity wanting to target Adults 18-29 made no sense to me. We even gave them research showing the most likely demo to give to charity is Adults 50+ and Adults 18-29 are the LEAST likely demo to give to charity, but no, they were stubborn. It's like these advertisers go to listen to some motivational speaker who gets up there and brainwashes them about how they need to target millenials no matter what you are selling
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

This is the kind of hyperbole which just makes you look ridiculous. So white audiences are "suffering" because there is a show on a network which they don't have to watch. Holy shite...we are fricked.



Wrong

I work in television and used to work at a FOX Affliate in a market that was only 3% black. We had inventory in the Monday Night 8p-9p block on FOX we could not sell because Empire did 0 ratings in our market. When I said suffer I said it was our station suffering since we got no money for that inventory. We could not sell it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram