Started By
Message

Tomorrowland 2015 = John Carter 2012?

Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:20 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98859 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:20 pm
Went to see Tomorrowland this evening with the wife and kids and it was thoroughly enjoyable. Even the missus, who is no science fiction fangirl, liked it a lot.

So, I was trying to figure out why its box office has been soft and RT rating was so low (48% positive) and I got to thinking about John Carter. That movie faltered on release, but gained popularity since.

Can it be that Disney doesn't know how to effectively market a "new" concept sci-fi movie (as opposed to we'll establish franchise [Star Wars])?
This post was edited on 6/6/15 at 2:33 pm
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10206 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:56 pm to
Man, I hate to assign political motives to everything but I can't help but wonder if Tomorrowland's portrayal of enivronmentalists as overly defeatist has something to do with the low RT score.

I have noticed low RT scores for movies that don't fit a certain political narrative.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98859 posts
Posted on 6/6/15 at 2:22 pm to
That's certainly possible.

I try to avoid reading to much into implied political messages from movies (facially nonpolitical movies). That said, it is interesting that Bird's two Disney movies (The Incredibles and Tomorrowland) seem to have a decidedly anti-liberal message.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99059 posts
Posted on 6/6/15 at 2:32 pm to
How can Tomorrowland or John Carter be rated low when Spy with the fat chick is over 90%.
This post was edited on 6/6/15 at 2:32 pm
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 6/6/15 at 3:48 pm to
I enjoyed John Carter but Tomorrowland doesn't sound like something I would be interested in.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31590 posts
Posted on 6/6/15 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

I have noticed low RT scores for movies that don't fit a certain political narrative.



Nailed it on the head.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98859 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 5:56 pm to
Watching John Carter on AMC. Damned entertaining movie.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27875 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 6:12 pm to
The rare 20 month bump.
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21161 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 6:25 pm to
He must have done a search and this was the only John Carter thread that came up.

John Carter was a pretty entertaining movie to me, I've watched it a couple times.
Tomorrowland had an interesting look but never explained who the Tomorrowland guys were or how they came to be. The conclusion is "imagination is good." OK, not very overwhelming.
Posted by Backinthe615
Member since Nov 2011
6871 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 6:39 pm to
Yeah, Tomorrowland was kind of all over the place. So the Earth is on a precise countdown to end in nuclear war, global warming, drought, flood and famine? Not to mention Clooney was a little creepy in the cranky, old dude having flashbacks with littlle robot girl role.

But if it gets kids to look up tachyons, then cool I guess.


This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 6:43 pm
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39584 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 7:17 pm to
I can't remember what part of the movie it was but the plot jumped without explanation at one point. I rewound it and it still didn't make sense.

So I looked up the writer and...Damon Lindelhoff was the writer. Then it all made sense why it made no fricking sense.
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3476 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 7:20 pm to
Tomorrowland is a waste of time

3.0-3.1 range out of 10

John Carter is enjoyable.

6.9 range out of 10
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21161 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 8:15 pm to
Tachyons have become a go to magic particle in scifi.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36060 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:08 pm to
Loved John Carter.
Own the DVD, watched it multiple times.

Hated Tomorrowland. Boring and depressing.
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:35 pm to
Tomorrowland was actually good and original.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36060 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Damon Lindelhoff was the writer. Then it all made sense why it made no fricking sense.


Brad Bird gets half of the blame.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37295 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

The rare 20 month bump.


Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 8:40 pm to
Well, they were both by the same director.


Here's the deal. John Carter has been a success, just not in the box office.
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45086 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 8:55 pm to
John Carter is a great movie and the alien princess is a freaking smokeshow.

I will never understand why John Carter didn't work.The story and world around the plot is very interesting as well.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:52 pm to
Marketing.



Guardians of the Galaxy was a similar gamble, but had great marketing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram