Started By
Message

Thoughts on The Thin Red Line?

Posted on 1/28/16 at 3:11 pm
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 3:11 pm
I remember watching it when I was younger and I didn't "get" it. Watched it again the other night and it really clicked with me. The patented Malick landscape shots and flashbacks work so well with the scenery of the island and the situation the soldiers were in.

Probably the best example is when Ben Chaplin's character is tasked with scouting the ridge. You get the sweeping views of the hills, jungle, and ocean in the distance, then backdown to his level crawling in the tall grass, then into his mental flashback to being with his wife. Just awesome.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 3:18 pm to
Better than Saving Private Ryan.

I think a lot of the regulars on this board agree with that.


Good piece of film.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42503 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 3:22 pm to
Wasn't the Hollywood standard fare you watched in Saving Private Ryan but it was a good movie that was well received by the awards groups.

It was long and I would say for more mature audiences that took the time to watch it and understand it.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101919 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 3:25 pm to
quote:


Better than Saving Private Ryan.


Nah... but I did enjoy it a good bit.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 3:59 pm to
It's one of my very favorite films of all time.

My favorite scene, or moment of time, in any movie, ever, is that scene after the battle is over when Nick Nolte's character takes a sad, like hopeless deep breath and his face is just... so spent and wrecked and utterly disappointed. It's like 3 seconds of film but it's so perfect. I don't know if I can capture that emotion or make a definitive statement of that human condition in words, but we all know it and I've never seen acting so real and so accurate at capturing it.
Posted by ElephantGA
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2015
538 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 4:40 pm to
I need to watch this again, I was also younger when I watched it and I didn't "get" it either. I do remember the cast was really good.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59491 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Better than Saving Private Ryan.

I think a lot of the regulars on this board agree with that.

Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
9316 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 4:51 pm to
It's an anti-American military movie with tons of anti-American military, die-hard liberal actors throughout: Sean Penn, George Clooney, John Travolta, Woody Harrelson, John Cusack, etc.

As usual, the officers are dicks who callously throw away the lives of their soldiers on a whim because, "Damn it, I want results!" while the poor private is sent to die for a war he doesn't understand.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18421 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 4:54 pm to
Very good movie and I think it was better than Saving Private Ryan. Love the artsy direction and how it captured the psychological horror of war.
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

I think it was better than Saving Private Ryan


Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59491 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 4:58 pm to
I like it also but I'm laughing at pectus trolling.
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 4:59 pm to
It WAS better than CATS though. I will watch it again and again.
Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16316 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 5:08 pm to
The same pretentious garbage that Malick has always made
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 5:10 pm to
You must remember how Saving Private Ryan was shoved down our throats though.


I remember having to watch the storming the beach scene in the Library during a class where we me a guy who was on the beach invasion. This was after 9/11. Propaganda!
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35479 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 5:14 pm to
Best war movie

Because they show real fear and hiding in the grass an refusing to take that hill..
Just like they say 15% of rifles were actually fired by Americans in D day...most were trying to be humans and stay alive buried in the sand...

Thin red line is like Gallipoli and shows typical chain of command and all those Aussies lost for no reason but stubbornness ....to say we didn't also have that on our side in wwii is myopic.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78498 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 6:27 pm to
Oh man. People HATE this movie. I mean, people line up to talk shite about this film.

For my money it's one of the finest war movies ever, a visual feast, and it has this dark mediatiative quality that really portrays the futility of war. So many scenes stand out,obviously the cinematography on the ridgeline scene, the scene where they overrun the Japanese camp,The river scene with Adrian Brody, the infusion of nature with man throughout, the scene with Nolte, the wide shots from the fleet, the killer narration. Caviezel and Koteas were excellent.

I love every second of Thin Red Line. Malick nailed it.I will never understand how people hate on it.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63486 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

It's an anti-American military movie with tons of anti-American military, die-hard liberal actors throughout: Sean Penn, George Clooney, John Travolta, Woody Harrelson, John Cusack, etc.

As usual, the officers are dicks who callously throw away the lives of their soldiers on a whim because, "Damn it, I want results!" while the poor private is sent to die for a war he doesn't understand.



That is so absurd I find myself laughing out loud. It certainly showed some of the cruelty and absurdity of war, but it was not anti-American nor anti-military. Nick Nolte's character was a dick, but if you think that's totally unrealistic, you're nuts.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8002 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Best war movie

Because they show real fear and hiding in the grass an refusing to take that hill..
Just like they say 15% of rifles were actually fired by Americans in D day...most were trying to be humans and stay alive buried in the sand...

Thin red line is like Gallipoli and shows typical chain of command and all those Aussies lost for no reason but stubbornness ....to say we didn't also have that on our side in wwii is myopic.


Well, I wouldn't agree with that. The problem is that it's just cartoonish in its depiction of the chain of command (and even, to some degree, the lower enlisted).

I like the movie for other reasons - it is beautiful and it was one of the earliest to really show that fear and existential self-reflection that a lot of soldiers in combat experience, but...

Malick seems absolutely beholden to this weird Heidegger-ish Christian ideology where he glorifies the past beyond reason (a lot of "noble savage" references in his work) and rails against what technology does to the framing of human existence.

I don't find this movie necessarily political at all, but he is certainly looking at the world very differently than pretty much all of Hollywood.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78498 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 7:00 pm to
Good post. I think if you are a bit of the philosopher yourself, if you are constantly looking for patterns and meaning in your life, this movie will likely appeal to you. The criticism of course is that it is pretentious, but then philosophy and self-reflection always are to people who don't do much of that themselves, right?
Posted by Tackle74
Columbia, MO
Member since Mar 2012
5256 posts
Posted on 1/28/16 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

I love every second of Thin Red Line. Malick nailed it.I will never understand how people hate on it.


Simple the movie is not an accurate portrayal of WW II combat especially on Guadalcanal. It is artsy and pretentious. I understand how those that love cinema can appreciate the cinematography or the psychological aspects. I prefer my war films to not frick around with scenes of tigers stalking jungles and guys chilling with natives. I mean my good they make the Japanese soldiers look like wimps, crying and surrendering on that hill while the mean Americans knock their teeth out for the gold. The Japanese were tough as hell and in 1942 were not surrendering in droves crying to the GI's.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram