- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The ‘Ghostbusters’ Trailer Most ‘Disliked’ Movie Trailer in YouTube Histo
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:13 pm to TotesMcGotes
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:13 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
You are proving his point, which is that people are rooting for this to fail as hard as they are because of the female cast.
No. We are rooting for it to fail because we don't like Hollywood sacrificing a good movie to push their ideas. If I want to pay money to be preached at I will go to church.
2
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:19 pm to Ham Solo
If this weren't an all-female cast, people wouldn't actively hope it fails as much as they currently are.
Female casts have made money. You think a studio is going to make a film because they want the push some feminist message and sacrifice money?
Female casts have made money. You think a studio is going to make a film because they want the push some feminist message and sacrifice money?
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:19 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:i laughed IRL
“GhostBusters - Fat Dyke Edition”.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:20 pm to Ham Solo
Also, how is this Hollywood "sacrificing" a good movie? What is being sacrificed?
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:25 pm to YumYum Sauce
Should have connected it to the original ghost busters
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:25 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
Female casts have made money. You think a studio is going to make a film because they want the push some feminist message and sacrifice money?
It will make money simply because it is called Ghostbusters. What they are sacrificing is an attempt to make a good movie just to shoehorn in an all woman cast. It just screams gimmick all the way.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:28 pm to Ham Solo
quote:because movie studios have never messed up reboots with male casts
What they are sacrificing is an attempt to make a good movie just to shoehorn in an all woman cast.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:31 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
because movie studios have never messed up reboots with male casts
I agree with that. I said before without Bill Murray this should not have been made. This movie seems like nothing but a cash grab.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:33 pm to Ham Solo
Bill Murray has a cameo in this one. He didn't want to do Dan Akroyd's Ghostbusters 3 because he didn't like the script.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 7:56 pm to Ham Solo
So you think they said frick everything else as long as the cast is all female?
Posted on 4/29/16 at 8:46 pm to Ham Solo
Jesus Christ, my liberal schtick is mainly to irritate people but some of you guys (most of you) belong in the 1950s south.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 8:58 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
There has been a lot of misogyny around this movie from posters on here from the day it was announced.
It's stunt casting, simple as that.
They could have made a movie about paranormal detectives starring 4 women, not call it Ghostbusters, and no one would have cared or reacted.
Calling it Ghostbusters was the problem, that reeks of stunt casting, not creating a unique story that just happens to star 4 women.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 9:23 pm to Lacour
quote:
Jesus Christ, my liberal schtick is mainly to irritate people but some of you guys (most of you) belong in the 1950s south
Once again it's not about us being sexist. It is about us seeing a publicity stunt rather than a well thought out movie. I get that they are running a business, but can we not try to make a good movie and make money at the same time.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 10:20 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
There has been a lot of misogyny around this movie from posters on here from the day it was announced
How is it misogynistic when you have plenty of women criticizing it on YouTube? So these women hate their own gender because of it? Or they hate it because the content sucks? Hmmm, which one is more logical?
Posted on 4/29/16 at 10:27 pm to YumYum Sauce
This movie looks so bad I won't even RedBox it.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 10:49 pm to YumYum Sauce
If you recut the trailer to remove all of Leslie Jones's scenes, it's really not that bad at all.
But, like Jesse Eisenberg, she takes an otherwise flawed but watchable movie and turns it into a steaming pile of dog shite
But, like Jesse Eisenberg, she takes an otherwise flawed but watchable movie and turns it into a steaming pile of dog shite
Posted on 4/29/16 at 10:49 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
You think a studio is going to make a film because they want the push some feminist message
Yes
Posted on 4/29/16 at 10:51 pm to fr33manator
"and sacrifice money"?
No.
No.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 10:55 pm to Breesus
She is the worst. As soon as I saw her I knew the movie would suck. It could have the original cast plus her and I wouldn't watch it.
Posted on 4/29/16 at 11:10 pm to TotesMcGotes
They just assumed they could shovel out a shite script with an unfunny cast, make it all women to be edgy, slap ghostbusters on it and they'd have a moneymaker on their hands.
They judged wrong
They judged wrong
This post was edited on 4/30/16 at 4:13 pm
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News