- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/17/16 at 6:46 am to REG861
Somebody always bites on that one
Posted on 12/17/16 at 6:53 am to Vols&Shaft83
Even with that big ole shiny hook?
Posted on 12/17/16 at 11:05 am to Vols&Shaft83
Damnit . I was ready to argue. I have seen a few people on here say they were guilty who weren't trolling, it blows my mind
Posted on 12/17/16 at 11:09 am to REG861
Do I think they're guilty? No.
Should they have been convicted? No.
Is it still possible that at least Nichols was involved? Yes.
Should they have been convicted? No.
Is it still possible that at least Nichols was involved? Yes.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 11:20 am to titmouse
quote:
s it still possible that at least Nichols was involved? Yes.
He wasn't.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 11:30 am to im4LSU
quote:
.
I saw Jason Baldwins name listed under the title. Did he have a hand in production?
i think so? I know the main producer was LOTR's Peter Jackson. It's better than the other three. I forget whether 2 or 3, but one of the PL sequels was a complete waste of time because all it did was focus on that poor Byars guy like he was guilty. West of Memphis makes a pretty strong case for Hobbs being the killer.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 4:23 pm to REG861
quote:
Damnit . I was ready to argue. I have seen a few people on here say they were guilty who weren't trolling, it blows my mind
I mean, I could actually make a compelling case against the WM3, but I really don't want to put that kind of effort into a post that nobody will read because their minds are made up based on watching Paradise Lost. Plus I don't think they were guilty.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 7:06 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Holy shite that red neck step dad.
EPIC.
EPIC.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 7:20 pm to STLhog
West Memphis is a special place
Posted on 12/17/16 at 7:24 pm to Sasquatch Smash
quote:
They all finally agreed to the Alford plea in order to get Damien off of death row. They had to admit guilt to do it
Not really.
Best way to describe an Alford plea:
quote:
"A plea under which a defendant may choose to plead guilty, not because of an admission to the crime, but because the prosecutor has sufficient evidence to place a charge and to obtain conviction in court.
Arkansas was fine with it given the new holes in the case and that fact that they could avoid potential civil suits.
The worst person in the whole legal side has to be the original judge, (now Arkansas state senator) David Burnett. Continually denying new trials and calling the new DNA testing "inconclusive."
Posted on 12/17/16 at 7:46 pm to REG861
quote:
I will say Damian did nothing to help them and his arrogance put them all in a bad position through the entire process
Posted on 12/17/16 at 8:02 pm to im4LSU
It is interesting in retrospect what a fetish there was for the idea of satanists running around worshiping the devil and killing people. For whatever reason it seems to have run its course in the majority of our culture but it was something people seemed to talk about seriously in the 80s and 90s.
It was the combination of that interest in proving the dangers of satanism and the need of the police to solve an ugly crime that did most of the legwork for the three to be investigated and convicted in the first place.
It was the combination of that interest in proving the dangers of satanism and the need of the police to solve an ugly crime that did most of the legwork for the three to be investigated and convicted in the first place.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:25 pm to REG861
quote:
i think so? I know the main producer was LOTR's Peter Jackson. It's better than the other three. I forget whether 2 or 3, but one of the PL sequels was a complete waste of time because all it did was focus on that poor Byars guy like he was guilty. West of Memphis makes a pretty strong case for Hobbs being the killer.
Yea it was the 2nd one that went after Byers. Thad dude was throwd way the frick off. That one was tough to watch at points but I guess Arkansas gonna Arkansas.
Just watched West of Memphis. Id say the case against Hobbs was pretty damning. Its a shame he'll never get his day in court. The 3 PL were really good but this one was the best buy far.
What a fricked up story all around. I still wouldnt be surprised if it came out that they had something to do with it though...
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:58 pm to AshLSU
Jessie Misskelley's testimony about the broken bottle found at the crime scene have me convinced that the West Memphis Three committed the killings.
LINK
Jessie Misskelley said he threw the bottle and it smashed and the investigators later found the broken bottle at the crime scene. How would Jessie know about the specific details at the crime scene if he wasn't there? Plus he confessed eight or nine times repeatedly without coercion. He confessed to his attorney, his friends, and his family members. Some people claim that Misskelley is mentally disabled which is why he confessed. However, his own defense expert said they conducted an IQ test on him and found out his IQ was in the low to mid 80s. His IQ was below average and he didn't do well in school but he was definitely not mentally handicapped. He was clearly capable of understanding the questions he was asked and responding in appropriate fashion.
quote:
February 8, 1994: Jessie Misskelley put his hand on a Bible and swore to his attorney (Dan Stidham) that he, Damien, and Jason committed the murders. Further, he told Stidham that he was drunk on Evan Williams whiskey during the murders and the broken bottle could be found where he threw it on the ground under a bridge in West Memphis on his way home from the crime scene. Stidham told prosecutors he would believe his client's confession if he could find that bottle. So Stidham, WMPD Inspector Gary Gitchell, and the prosecutors drove to West Memphis to look for it. They found a broken Evan Williams bottle in the exact area that Stidham indicated Jessie said it would be. According to Prosecutor John Fogleman, Stidham directed the group to search the I-40 underpass nearest to Wal-Mart (near the current sight of Kroger), and the men found the broken bottle in that location. Further corroborating this story is the fact that Jessie mentioned in this 2/8/94 confession that Vicki Hutcheson was the one who bought him Evan Williams whiskey on the day of the murders. When the attorneys called Hutcheson she confirmed that she did, indeed, buy Jessie a bottle of Evan Williams on the day of the murders.
LINK
Jessie Misskelley said he threw the bottle and it smashed and the investigators later found the broken bottle at the crime scene. How would Jessie know about the specific details at the crime scene if he wasn't there? Plus he confessed eight or nine times repeatedly without coercion. He confessed to his attorney, his friends, and his family members. Some people claim that Misskelley is mentally disabled which is why he confessed. However, his own defense expert said they conducted an IQ test on him and found out his IQ was in the low to mid 80s. His IQ was below average and he didn't do well in school but he was definitely not mentally handicapped. He was clearly capable of understanding the questions he was asked and responding in appropriate fashion.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:59 pm to im4LSU
one of Hobb's friends who was dying said the kids were playing in the woods and saw he, Hobbs and a few others smoking weed and meth and distributing drugs to sell. He said later that night Hobb's called him and told him he had taken care of the kids. I think the dude died right after he went public with the info.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:20 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Jessie Misskelley said he threw the bottle and it smashed and the investigators later found the broken bottle at the crime scene. How would Jessie know about the specific details at the crime scene if he wasn't there? Plus he confessed eight or nine times repeatedly without coercion. He confessed to his attorney, his friends, and his family members. Some people claim that Misskelley is mentally disabled which is why he confessed. However, his own defense expert said they conducted an IQ test on him and found out his IQ was in the low to mid 80s. His IQ was below average and he didn't do well in school but he was definitely not mentally handicapped. He was clearly capable of understanding the questions he was asked and responding in appropriate fashion.
do you really think this is some 'gotcha?'
He was absolutely coerced. It's all on film and attested to in West of Memphis. Misskelley originally confessed (after being illegally detained all day without a lawyer) that they a) raped the kids b) strangled them) and c) it took place in the morning. He said that because those were the rumors floating around town and he went off of what the West Memphis public knew. It was something like a month before they were arrested after the killings.
Whoops. Turns out that a) there was no sexual assault b) the kids were beaten to death and not strangled and c) they were in school that day and couldn't have been killed in the morning. Wouldn't the killer know those fundamental details, like whether they were killed at 7 am or 6 pm, or whether or not the kids were anally raped? Huh? If you've bothered to watch any of the documentaries, which I'm sure you haven't, they make this abundantly clear. The cops are on tape walking Misskelley through his original confession and steering him away from it because they knew it defeated their case. The transcript is widely available. It was 100% coerced and it's on camera. How did he know about the bottle? It was fricking known because the cops fed it to him the same way the forced him to change the time of the murder from the morning to the late evening.
let me put it this way: when the Byers family now is adamant that the WM3 are innocent, that should tell you something
This post was edited on 12/17/16 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:32 pm to REG861
quote:
He was absolutely coerced. It's all on film and attested to in West of Memphis. Misskelley originally confessed (after being illegally detained all day without a lawyer) that they a) raped the kids b) strangled them) and c) it took place in the morning. He said that because those were the rumors floating around town and he went off of what the West Memphis public knew. It was something like a month before they were arrested after the killings.
Whoops. Turns out that a) there was no sexual assault b) the kids were beaten to death and not strangled and c) they were in school that day and couldn't have been killed in the morning. Wouldn't the killer know those fundamental details, like whether they were killed at 7 am or 6 pm? Huh? If you've bothered to watch any of the documentaries, which I'm sure you haven't, they make this abundantly clear. The cops are on tape walking Misskelley through his original confession and steering him away from it. It was 100% coerced and it's on camera. How did he know about the bottle? It was fricking known because the cops fed it to him the same way the forced him to change the time of the murder from the morning to the late evening. Take a seat.
You do understand that the purpose of any documentary is to shape the story to fit the filmmaker's bias.
Blackfish was full of lies and misrepresentations.
Making a Murderer may have been the most egregious example in quite a while.
I do you think you have to look at counter arguments before drawing a conclusion about a case.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:37 pm to REG861
The thing that stands out to me more than anything is the pure lack of emotion on display from the 3 through the entire trial. Especially when the verdicts are handed down.
I'm sorry but I have a hard time believing that anyone would be able to remain so relaxed in that situation if they were indeed innocent.
It came of to me as a "well frick, they got us" attitude. They were just stone-faced.
But then in the "West of Memphis" doc, the guys that came forth that said they overheard Hobbs and his brother, along with the "Hobbs family Secret" story, seemed pretty legit as well...
I'm sorry but I have a hard time believing that anyone would be able to remain so relaxed in that situation if they were indeed innocent.
It came of to me as a "well frick, they got us" attitude. They were just stone-faced.
But then in the "West of Memphis" doc, the guys that came forth that said they overheard Hobbs and his brother, along with the "Hobbs family Secret" story, seemed pretty legit as well...
This post was edited on 12/17/16 at 10:39 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News