Started By
Message

re: Paradise Lost - West Memphis 3

Posted on 12/17/16 at 6:01 am to
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
31935 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 6:01 am to
quote:

west of Memphis.


Saw that one on there. Probably gonna check it out tonight.

I saw Jason Baldwins name listed under the title. Did he have a hand in production?
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 6:46 am to
Somebody always bites on that one
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
31935 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 6:53 am to
Even with that big ole shiny hook?
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36416 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 11:05 am to
Damnit . I was ready to argue. I have seen a few people on here say they were guilty who weren't trolling, it blows my mind
Posted by titmouse
a tree branch above your car
Member since May 2006
6356 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 11:09 am to
Do I think they're guilty? No.
Should they have been convicted? No.
Is it still possible that at least Nichols was involved? Yes.
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 11:20 am to
quote:

s it still possible that at least Nichols was involved? Yes.


He wasn't.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36416 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 11:30 am to
quote:

.

I saw Jason Baldwins name listed under the title. Did he have a hand in production?


i think so? I know the main producer was LOTR's Peter Jackson. It's better than the other three. I forget whether 2 or 3, but one of the PL sequels was a complete waste of time because all it did was focus on that poor Byars guy like he was guilty. West of Memphis makes a pretty strong case for Hobbs being the killer.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Damnit . I was ready to argue. I have seen a few people on here say they were guilty who weren't trolling, it blows my mind



I mean, I could actually make a compelling case against the WM3, but I really don't want to put that kind of effort into a post that nobody will read because their minds are made up based on watching Paradise Lost. Plus I don't think they were guilty.


Posted by STLhog
Nashville, TN
Member since Jan 2015
17718 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 7:06 pm to
Holy shite that red neck step dad.

EPIC.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36416 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 7:20 pm to
West Memphis is a special place
Posted by bbrownso
Member since Mar 2008
8985 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

They all finally agreed to the Alford plea in order to get Damien off of death row. They had to admit guilt to do it

Not really.

Best way to describe an Alford plea:
quote:

"A plea under which a defendant may choose to plead guilty, not because of an admission to the crime, but because the prosecutor has sufficient evidence to place a charge and to obtain conviction in court.


Arkansas was fine with it given the new holes in the case and that fact that they could avoid potential civil suits.

The worst person in the whole legal side has to be the original judge, (now Arkansas state senator) David Burnett. Continually denying new trials and calling the new DNA testing "inconclusive."
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83360 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

I will say Damian did nothing to help them and his arrogance put them all in a bad position through the entire process



Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36110 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 8:02 pm to
It is interesting in retrospect what a fetish there was for the idea of satanists running around worshiping the devil and killing people. For whatever reason it seems to have run its course in the majority of our culture but it was something people seemed to talk about seriously in the 80s and 90s.

It was the combination of that interest in proving the dangers of satanism and the need of the police to solve an ugly crime that did most of the legwork for the three to be investigated and convicted in the first place.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36416 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 8:33 pm to
i shouldnt laugh but.. .
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
31935 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

i think so? I know the main producer was LOTR's Peter Jackson. It's better than the other three. I forget whether 2 or 3, but one of the PL sequels was a complete waste of time because all it did was focus on that poor Byars guy like he was guilty. West of Memphis makes a pretty strong case for Hobbs being the killer.


Yea it was the 2nd one that went after Byers. Thad dude was throwd way the frick off. That one was tough to watch at points but I guess Arkansas gonna Arkansas.

Just watched West of Memphis. Id say the case against Hobbs was pretty damning. Its a shame he'll never get his day in court. The 3 PL were really good but this one was the best buy far.

What a fricked up story all around. I still wouldnt be surprised if it came out that they had something to do with it though...

Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33939 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:58 pm to
Jessie Misskelley's testimony about the broken bottle found at the crime scene have me convinced that the West Memphis Three committed the killings.

quote:

February 8, 1994: Jessie Misskelley put his hand on a Bible and swore to his attorney (Dan Stidham) that he, Damien, and Jason committed the murders. Further, he told Stidham that he was drunk on Evan Williams whiskey during the murders and the broken bottle could be found where he threw it on the ground under a bridge in West Memphis on his way home from the crime scene. Stidham told prosecutors he would believe his client's confession if he could find that bottle. So Stidham, WMPD Inspector Gary Gitchell, and the prosecutors drove to West Memphis to look for it. They found a broken Evan Williams bottle in the exact area that Stidham indicated Jessie said it would be. According to Prosecutor John Fogleman, Stidham directed the group to search the I-40 underpass nearest to Wal-Mart (near the current sight of Kroger), and the men found the broken bottle in that location. Further corroborating this story is the fact that Jessie mentioned in this 2/8/94 confession that Vicki Hutcheson was the one who bought him Evan Williams whiskey on the day of the murders. When the attorneys called Hutcheson she confirmed that she did, indeed, buy Jessie a bottle of Evan Williams on the day of the murders.


LINK

Jessie Misskelley said he threw the bottle and it smashed and the investigators later found the broken bottle at the crime scene. How would Jessie know about the specific details at the crime scene if he wasn't there? Plus he confessed eight or nine times repeatedly without coercion. He confessed to his attorney, his friends, and his family members. Some people claim that Misskelley is mentally disabled which is why he confessed. However, his own defense expert said they conducted an IQ test on him and found out his IQ was in the low to mid 80s. His IQ was below average and he didn't do well in school but he was definitely not mentally handicapped. He was clearly capable of understanding the questions he was asked and responding in appropriate fashion.
Posted by AlbertMeansWell
Member since Sep 2013
5555 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:59 pm to
one of Hobb's friends who was dying said the kids were playing in the woods and saw he, Hobbs and a few others smoking weed and meth and distributing drugs to sell. He said later that night Hobb's called him and told him he had taken care of the kids. I think the dude died right after he went public with the info.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36416 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:20 pm to
quote:


Jessie Misskelley said he threw the bottle and it smashed and the investigators later found the broken bottle at the crime scene. How would Jessie know about the specific details at the crime scene if he wasn't there? Plus he confessed eight or nine times repeatedly without coercion. He confessed to his attorney, his friends, and his family members. Some people claim that Misskelley is mentally disabled which is why he confessed. However, his own defense expert said they conducted an IQ test on him and found out his IQ was in the low to mid 80s. His IQ was below average and he didn't do well in school but he was definitely not mentally handicapped. He was clearly capable of understanding the questions he was asked and responding in appropriate fashion.




do you really think this is some 'gotcha?'

He was absolutely coerced. It's all on film and attested to in West of Memphis. Misskelley originally confessed (after being illegally detained all day without a lawyer) that they a) raped the kids b) strangled them) and c) it took place in the morning. He said that because those were the rumors floating around town and he went off of what the West Memphis public knew. It was something like a month before they were arrested after the killings.

Whoops. Turns out that a) there was no sexual assault b) the kids were beaten to death and not strangled and c) they were in school that day and couldn't have been killed in the morning. Wouldn't the killer know those fundamental details, like whether they were killed at 7 am or 6 pm, or whether or not the kids were anally raped? Huh? If you've bothered to watch any of the documentaries, which I'm sure you haven't, they make this abundantly clear. The cops are on tape walking Misskelley through his original confession and steering him away from it because they knew it defeated their case. The transcript is widely available. It was 100% coerced and it's on camera. How did he know about the bottle? It was fricking known because the cops fed it to him the same way the forced him to change the time of the murder from the morning to the late evening.

let me put it this way: when the Byers family now is adamant that the WM3 are innocent, that should tell you something
This post was edited on 12/17/16 at 10:26 pm
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

He was absolutely coerced. It's all on film and attested to in West of Memphis. Misskelley originally confessed (after being illegally detained all day without a lawyer) that they a) raped the kids b) strangled them) and c) it took place in the morning. He said that because those were the rumors floating around town and he went off of what the West Memphis public knew. It was something like a month before they were arrested after the killings.

Whoops. Turns out that a) there was no sexual assault b) the kids were beaten to death and not strangled and c) they were in school that day and couldn't have been killed in the morning. Wouldn't the killer know those fundamental details, like whether they were killed at 7 am or 6 pm? Huh? If you've bothered to watch any of the documentaries, which I'm sure you haven't, they make this abundantly clear. The cops are on tape walking Misskelley through his original confession and steering him away from it. It was 100% coerced and it's on camera. How did he know about the bottle? It was fricking known because the cops fed it to him the same way the forced him to change the time of the murder from the morning to the late evening. Take a seat.





You do understand that the purpose of any documentary is to shape the story to fit the filmmaker's bias.

Blackfish was full of lies and misrepresentations.

Making a Murderer may have been the most egregious example in quite a while.


I do you think you have to look at counter arguments before drawing a conclusion about a case.
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
31935 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:37 pm to
The thing that stands out to me more than anything is the pure lack of emotion on display from the 3 through the entire trial. Especially when the verdicts are handed down.

I'm sorry but I have a hard time believing that anyone would be able to remain so relaxed in that situation if they were indeed innocent.

It came of to me as a "well frick, they got us" attitude. They were just stone-faced.

But then in the "West of Memphis" doc, the guys that came forth that said they overheard Hobbs and his brother, along with the "Hobbs family Secret" story, seemed pretty legit as well...
This post was edited on 12/17/16 at 10:39 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram