Started By
Message

re: KISS

Posted on 7/22/10 at 4:11 pm to
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59504 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

(even though it hasnt been 35 years

my bad. only 34 years.

Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

First of all, I like Creed a lot,


To quote the AV Club:

ý"A lot of people hate Scott Stapp, mainly because he f*****g sucks. They hate how Creed combines the worst elements of grunge—humorlessness, pretension, hunger-dunger-dang over-singing, melodrama—with the worst parts of Christianity: self-righteousness, faux-piety, rank hypocrisy. They hate how the monobrowed Stapp looks like the lovechild of Billy Ray Cyrus and a caveman, and they hate his penchant for striking Jesus poses. But mostly, as I argued earlier in this paragraph, they hate him because he f*****g sucks."

I love that passage.

quote:

I think you are really severely undervaluing the quality of songwriting.
And I think you are severely overrating it. Though I do admire your passion for Hard Luck Woman. i think it's entirely misplaced passion, but it is passion nonetheless.

quote:

KISS were great business people - not idiot pushovers who had their accountants steal everything by the time they were 29. That is a VIRTUE.
First off, I absolutely agree about their business acumen. In fact, I've been arguing in favor of it since page one of this thread. I just find it funny that you take this hardline stance against anything except for what comes out of the speakers... unless of course it is something you like.

quote:

Again, if you like what comes out of the speakers, then who gives a shite if it is "shamelessly cynical"? I mean, I get the idea that you don't like what's coming out of the speakers, but it shouldn't be BECAUSE of some perceived cynicism on the artists' end.
No, it's the fact that it's so shamelessly cynical that the eventual end product is crap. I don't like what comes out of the speakers, and the reason it got to that point is because they don't care about creating "art", they are just moving units. This is a band that spends more time on its makeup than its songs.

quote:

And Detroit Rock City is a remarkably stupid song.

That's a remarkably stupid statement.
Really? You don't think this is remarkably stupid?

Movin' fast, down 95
I hit top speed but I'm still movin' much too slow
I feel so good, I'm so alive
I hear my song playin' on the radio
It goes

Get up
Everybody's gonna move their feet
Get down
Everybody's gonna leave their seat

Twelve o'clock, I gotta rock
There's a truck ahead, lights starin' at my eyes
Oh my God, no time to turn
I got to laugh 'cause I know I'm (gonna
die)
Why?

Get up
Everybody's gonna (leave there seat)
Get down

I'll stand by different strokes for different folks and everybody likes what they like. I'm cool with that, but I think some things we can come to critical consensus on. Those are remarkably stupid lyrics, even by the rather lenient standards of rock n roll.


quote:

Songwriting.
Which isn't very good. Really, I think we can establish that their lyrics are beyond stupid. And I think their riffs aren't that great. Also, the song structures are just boring. This is rock-by-numbers.

quote:

I actually don't really like AC/DC. I think they are extremely over-rated.
They are also pretty stupid, but awesome in every way. Angus Young's riffs are ridiculous.

quote:

a)I'm asking how any of that would ever reach you. Just get a disc and spin it. Finito. You hear what's coming out of the speaker. You aren't FORCED to consume the "marketing" aspect.

b)I'm not sure it's fair to say that what goes on on stage is "marketing". I mean, shite, who doesn't go for a cool stage show? If that's the standard, then U2 is pure marketing hype.

(a)Well, we don't live in that world. And if we did, Kiss never puts out a record. They don't get to iTunes on the merit of their songs. they got their on their image. I'm aware of their image and arketing because I'm alive and aware of the world around me. Their marketing is sort of hard to miss.

(b) We're not talking about live shows, per se. We're talking about selling an image over the music. U2 does have an elaborate live show, and I find that equally obnoxious. I used to like their records (I don't think they've had a good album in a decade), but I hate their live shows. I don't enjoy them at all. Too much spectacle, not enough music.

Not that I'm inherently against spectacle. I find Peter Gabriel's live show to be extremely theatrical, but it works in service of the music. But this goes back to me preferring a club show. Those big stadium extravaganzas I find to be extremely silly.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:19 pm to
KISS puts on the best show in all of music, even the industry acknowledges this. KISS is without a doubt one of the greatest bands of all time.
Posted by BrockLanders
By Appointment Only
Member since Sep 2008
6507 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Angus Young's riffs are ridiculous.


Jeez, you must know very little about AC/DC.

If you've ever read anything where Angus speaks about AC/DC, he always says that Malcolm (yeah, the other guitarist who plays rhythm) is the heart of the group!

Getting back to Kiss, though, you seriously think a song like "I Want You" is terrible? Nothing about the riffs or the guitar solo sounds cool to you?
Posted by BrockLanders
By Appointment Only
Member since Sep 2008
6507 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

. Those are remarkably stupid lyrics, even by the rather lenient standards of rock n roll.



I'm certainly not going to say that Kiss's lyrics rival the depth of Bertrand Russell, but the song you mention is actually about someone who died in a car crash on their way to a Kiss show.

If I wanted to expose a pathetic Kiss lyric, I would have gone with something on one of their 80's records.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63504 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

quote:


Angus Young's riffs are ridiculous.




Jeez, you must know very little about AC/DC.


I'm pretty sure he meant ridiculous in a good way.
Posted by LSULM FAN
Frisco, Tx
Member since Feb 2004
549 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Baloo


I get more embarrased for you with every post. If your birth date on your profile is correct, I'm exactly one year older than you. I don't know when you first became aware of KISS, but I don't really have a memory of not knowing about them and being a fan. You don't like their music, fine, don't listen to it, which I'm guessing you don't. But to say they suck just because you don't like them is immature. I HATE U2, but would never say they suck, because obviously many people do like them. You criticize their marketing, why? What have the done differently lately that they haven't been doing since 1974? In the beginning they came up with a look to stand out from everyone else, and guess what, it worked. But their look alone is not what makes them great. If their music sucked as you say, they wouldn't have made it past 1975. If you don't like them, shut up and quit talking about them.
Posted by BrockLanders
By Appointment Only
Member since Sep 2008
6507 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

I'm pretty sure he meant ridiculous in a good way.


He did - but he doesn't even know which person in AC/DC came up with the riffs that are so superior to anything Kiss ever did!
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63504 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:29 pm to
I referred to P.T. Barnum earlier in this thread. I believe it was Mr. Barnum who said, "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."

KISS sells a lot of records and people go to their concerts. So?
Posted by LSULM FAN
Frisco, Tx
Member since Feb 2004
549 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

dirtbag lsu


quote:

my 1st concert in 1977 when I saw KISS in Shreveport


My first concert was KISS in Shreveport in 1979. Hirsh Memorial Coliseum.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

First off, I absolutely agree about their business acumen. In fact, I've been arguing in favor of it since page one of this thread. I just find it funny that you take this hardline stance against anything except for what comes out of the speakers... unless of course it is something you like.


I'm not saying that that's a reason to like their music. I'm saying that if you care about that, you should realize it's good and not bad. For me it has literally zero affect on the sound coming out of the speakers.

quote:

Really? You don't think this is remarkably stupid?


Doesn't look great in print, but I think it has great emotional effect in the song itself. It's about a fricking fan of theirs excited about going to a KISS concert and then dying en route. Do you think said fan spoke like Shakespeare or spoke like a teenager smoking a joint?

But since you asked:
quote:


Get up
Everybody's gonna move their feet
Get down
Everybody's gonna leave their seat


Yes, I think that is a clever little turn of phrase.

quote:

I'm cool with that, but I think some things we can come to critical consensus on. Those are remarkably stupid lyrics, even by the rather lenient standards of rock n roll.


Which brings us back to another point of discussion between us - I'm almost literally indifferent to lyrics.

quote:

Which isn't very good. Really, I think we can establish that their lyrics are beyond stupid. And I think their riffs aren't that great. Also, the song structures are just boring. This is rock-by-numbers.


Have you ever heard "She"? One of the greatest riffs/grooves ever. And less than 1% of your "music industry" people could write such a thing.

quote:

a)Well, we don't live in that world. And if we did, Kiss never puts out a record. They don't get to iTunes on the merit of their songs. they got their on their image. I'm aware of their image and arketing because I'm alive and aware of the world around me. Their marketing is sort of hard to miss.


So what we've found out is that bands just getting off the ground promote themselves and try to have a unique look? Groundbreaking. And also criticism-worthy.

quote:

We're talking about selling an image over the music


I'm just not sure what that means. I listen to their music. I don't watch their image. Songs come up on my computer or my mp3 player and I hear them and like them. Period.

What's really, truly obnoxious is that you can't even find it in your heart to acknowledge that Rock n Roll All Nite is a legitimately worthy anthemic rock classic. You can't even bring yourself to say "you know, I hate KISS and everything they stand for, but they DID write that one song that seemed like it was destined to be written that everyone likes for what it is - a party song".

At the end of the day, that's what a great song is to me - one that feels like it not only EXISTED, bit it HAD to exist and just had to wait to be DISCOVERED by the artist. I really don't like U2, but "One" is one of those songs. Ditto Back in Black.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59504 posts
Posted on 7/22/10 at 5:40 pm to
Damn Baloo, this is like the old days.









Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 7/23/10 at 9:12 am to
quote:

"you know, I hate KISS and everything they stand for, but they DID write that one song that seemed like it was destined to be written that everyone likes for what it is - a party song".
But that wouldn't be a true statement. You want me to say that, but I don't think any onf their songs were destined to be aything. And I don't think their songs are very good, even as party songs.

One of my favorite things about you, JT, as that you keep bringing up the context of the band while at the same time you argue context doesn't matter. You pretend like you're the only person on earth who is blissfully unaware of any piece of music's context in culture, rip those who note its context, and then feel free to point out its context when it suits your needs.

But my absolutle favorite is that you say "only the song matters" but then you throw out nearly half of the song when you say lyrics don't matter. You argue from a strict point of view - just the music, ma'am - but then throw out a good portion of the song as irrelevant.

I also enjoy that you believe that music criticism in and of itself is invalid, yet you continue to argue about it, which is itself a form of music criticism.

The tangle of contradictions is truly stunning. I find it absolutely fascinating. But, mostly, I like that you argue from a strict "whatever comes out of the speakers" standpoint, and you somehow like Creed and Kiss.

I do enjoy how wound up people are getting over the fact I think Kiss sucks. It's a band aimed at 12 year olds. Hey, when I was 12, I liked Thundercats. But then I became an adult and realized that show sucks, too.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63504 posts
Posted on 7/23/10 at 9:19 am to
quote:

I do enjoy how wound up people are getting over the fact I think Kiss sucks. It's a band aimed at 12 year olds. Hey, when I was 12, I liked Thundercats. But then I became an adult and realized that show sucks, too


Pretty much this. Altough I never liked KISS. Maybe I was a couple of years too old. I just never have been able to take them seriously or even listen to their music for just fun.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 7/23/10 at 10:02 am to
quote:

And I don't think their songs are very good, even as party songs.


That just seems absurd, given the worldwide knowledge and popularity of that one tune. It clearly IS good as a party song whether you like it or not. There's plenty of songs that I don't care for myself that fit that bill (the Dr. Who song, for one).

quote:


One of my favorite things about you, JT, as that you keep bringing up the context of the band while at the same time you argue context doesn't matter. You pretend like you're the only person on earth who is blissfully unaware of any piece of music's context in culture, rip those who note its context, and then feel free to point out its context when it suits your needs.


I'm not sure what "context" you're talking about.

quote:

But my absolutle favorite is that you say "only the song matters" but then you throw out nearly half of the song when you say lyrics don't matter. You argue from a strict point of view - just the music, ma'am - but then throw out a good portion of the song as irrelevant.


Well, I think that is just a legitimate disagreement. I think the melody of the vocals is 0% of the relevance and the lyrics is maybe some part of the other 10%. Lyrics are HALF of a song? That seems very strange to me. What are we to make of instrumental music? Is it half dead on arrival?

quote:

But, mostly, I like that you argue from a strict "whatever comes out of the speakers" standpoint, and you somehow like Creed and Kiss.


Sounds cute when you say it, but in essence all you are arguing is that your tastes are the only true tastes.

quote:


I do enjoy how wound up people are getting over the fact I think Kiss sucks. It's a band aimed at 12 year olds. Hey, when I was 12, I liked Thundercats. But then I became an adult and realized that show sucks, too.



I got into KISS when I was 20.

ETA: I'd also like to point out who the frick cares who it is "aimed" at. It could be aimed at infants in incubators for all I care. If it sounds enjoyable coming out of the speaker, then it's aimed at ME.
This post was edited on 7/23/10 at 10:04 am
Posted by Martavius
Member since Nov 2005
16019 posts
Posted on 7/23/10 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

I do sign onto this. Maiden does rule. I'm not a big metalhead, but they are great.

You totally redeemed yourself here.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37269 posts
Posted on 7/23/10 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

If you don't like them, shut up and quit talking about them.


If we all shut up about the things we like and didn't like and took it at that...then there would be no point for this board. Just saying.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37269 posts
Posted on 7/23/10 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Hey, when I was 12, I liked Thundercats. But then I became an adult and realized that show sucks, too.


Whoah. Hold on now. Leave Lion-O out of this.

Oh yeah...



Who says we cant talk about music around here.
This post was edited on 7/23/10 at 6:08 pm
Posted by Geauxldineye
New Orleans, La
Member since Sep 2005
1345 posts
Posted on 7/23/10 at 7:25 pm to
I respect Kiss's place in music history, but at what point does touring with all that shite on become tedious and kind of a joke. It's like watching a bunch of drugged out, burned out musicians grasping and clawing to hold on to their 20's. Grow up and diversify yourself. If you wouldn't have blown most of your money on coke and god knows what else, you wouldn't have to embarrass yourself at the age of 50-60.
Posted by NachoSancho
NW LA
Member since Jan 2006
472 posts
Posted on 7/23/10 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

What was amazing to me watching this show last night was that they would play a concert in Melbourne, Australia and afterwards Paul Stanley would say how awesome it was, and then tell their manager "Let's go to Brisbane" and within a day or two they were in Brisbane setting up for a concert...no planning, just bounce from city to city hauling their stage equipment and everything...after one of their shows, the drummer Eric hooked up with a girl from New Zealand and they couldn't find him the next morning. When they called him he said he had gone to New Zealand with this girl and there was some kind of music fest going on there and they wanted KISS...so the rest of the band and crew fly to New Zealand and put on a concert (for 1 million dollars, I think they had mentioned)...this to me was incredible.


It doesn't work that way. Those parts were phony.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram