Started By
Message

A.V. Club: There may never be a box office hit like Titanic ever again

Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:09 pm
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:09 pm
quote:

Through pure dollars and cents, it would be hard to claim that Titanic is still the biggest movie of all time. It had a good run, certainly: For a dozen years, nothing approached the enormous domestic and international box office of James Cameron’s Oscar-winning epic about the unsinkable ship that sank. But then came Avatar, Cameron’s other overlong, over-budget, state-of-the-art adventure romance, which quickly surpassed the titanic earnings of Titanic in both the United States and the rest of the world. Eight years later, Avatar is still the global champ. Here in the states, the title now belongs to Star Wars: The Force Awakens, with poor Leo and Kate now floating in the icy waters of third place. Even inflation can’t save Titanic’s top spot in the record books: It’s squarely no. 5 when you adjust the grosses, sandwiched between E.T. and The Ten Commandments on the list of all-time hits.

So, no, Titanic isn’t king of the world anymore. Except maybe it is, at least on a more fundamental level. Maybe there’s still a case to be made for the super-sized disaster weepie as the ultimate multiplex sensation—a phenomenon that dominated the public imagination in a way that Avatar or The Force Awakens never could. To understand why Titanic remains special, you have to look past the total sum of money it earned, even relative to changing ticket prices. You have to look to a different kind of box-office record, one that hasn’t been equaled since and maybe never will be. You have to remember that Titanic was the no. 1 movie in America for 15 consecutive weeks.

Just stop and think about that for a second. Fifteen weeks. That’s almost four straight months. Titanic hit theaters in December of 1997, coming in first place at the box office its opening weekend. It then just sat there at the top of the charts until April of the following year. Every week brought a new crop of movies, hopefully released into hundreds or more theaters across the country. And every week, Americans made the joint decision to just see Titanic again instead.

There was precedence for this kind of magic run. It happened more often in the ’80s, when huge smashes like Beverly Hills Cop and Tootsie became similarly inescapable, each winning more than a dozen weekends straight. (It’s no coincidence that those films, like Cameron’s, opened in December; given Hollywood’s historic tendency to treat the early weeks of the year like a dumping ground for undesirable projects, it makes sense that a highly beloved movie could bulldoze from Christmas straight through the spring.) Titanic was really the last of this kind of hot-streak hit. No movie since has monopolized American movie culture in quite the same way.


LINK

Having the #1 movie for 15 consecutive weeks


Making $7 million more in the second weekend

Completely taking over American pop culture


James Cameron is truly the GOAT.



This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:11 pm
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:10 pm to
I confused by the black guy heads?
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9358 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:12 pm to
There was enough room for two.

How could he havemissed that if he is the GOAT?
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:14 pm to
It absolutely destroyed box office records and had a historic night at the Oscars, but nobody really talks about it anymore.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:15 pm
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

There was enough room for two.

How could he havemissed that if he is the GOAT


He didn't miss it. The entire movie is a metaphor for a woman's psyche.
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
22443 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

James Cameron is truly the GOAT.


Titanic sucked
Aliens 2 sucked
The abyss sucked
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51577 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:18 pm to
I'll always have a soft spot for Titanic, got me laid so many times in 98
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:19 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56331 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:18 pm to
Sappy bullshite that women lined up to see again and again.

James Cameron sold his soul for that and the even shittier Avatar.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89518 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:22 pm to
I'm as big a critic there is of the A-story and acting performances of the romantic leads, but taken for what it is - the last Epic Disaster movie (at least to not feature aliens/super heroes/villains being the disaster), with a phenomenal supporting cast and breathtaking visuals.

It turned the skinny French Canadian girl into an international recording star. It basically made Leo's career as a big budget leading man. It funded Avatar.

And how many films even show for 15 weeks anymore, much less lead for that long?

In the 80s films could run for 2 years if popular. In the 90s, you could still see popular films at 70 weeks or so. Today? 23 or 24 weeks is a LONG run.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:23 pm
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77965 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Aliens 2 sucked



I have never heard of this movie.

I saw Alien
I saw Aliens
I saw Alien 3
I saw Alien Ressurrection
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

I'm as big a critic there is of the A-story and acting performances of the romantic leads, but taken for what it is - the last Epic Disaster movie (at least to not feature aliens/super heroes/villains being the disaster), with a phenomenal supporting cast and breathtaking visuals.

It turned the skinny French Canadian girl into an international recording star. It basically made Leo's career as a big budget leading man. It funded Avatar.

And how many films even show for 15 weeks anymore, much less lead for that long?

In the 80s films could run for 2 years if popular. In the 90s, you could still see popular films at 70 weeks or so. Today? 23 or 24 weeks is a LONG run.



Go to Wikipedia and search like 2016 year in film - there are like 300 wide release films released in a given year now.

Go back to 97, or the 80's.....there's like 60.

I was look for like Willow the other day and the release date....and I was surprised how short the list was.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:28 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89518 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:29 pm to
Sure, but they're making too many big budget films now. It's breaking the studios, financially, as this year the tent pole films have underperformed.
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
22443 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:43 pm to
Aliens sucked**
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83362 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:55 pm to
I think E.T is probably more amazing when you look at its box office longevity.



E.T finished #1 at the box office in its 26th and 27th weeks in release. That is insane. You will never see that again.

It finished #1 16 different weeks, 1 more than Titanic

It spent 27 straight weeks in the Top 5...8 more weeks than Titanic

It spent 44 weeks in the Top 10, including 35 in a row. Titanic only did that 26 weeks.

And if you adjust for inflation, it has a higher domestic box office than Titanic





Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12757 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:03 pm to
How many oscars did E.T. take home?

Titanic is easily one of the greatest achievements in filmmaking.
Posted by Bankshot
Member since Jun 2006
5374 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:07 pm to
The box office used to be more erratic. In the 1980's movie like E.T., Top Gun, or Ghostbusters could hang around the top 5 for months and occasionally make it back to #1 after weeks of being #2 to #5. That hasn't happened since the 1980's. Also, this was before the proliferation of 10+ screen theaters and multiple screens would be dedicated to single films.
Posted by cigsmcgee
LR
Member since May 2012
5233 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

How many oscars did E.T. take home?


Awful metric in evaluating a movie. Oscar wins are only good for trivia, imo.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47604 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

There was enough room for two.


Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12757 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Awful metric in evaluating a movie. Oscar wins are only good for trivia, imo.


we're evaluating the success of the movie, not the movie itself.

When evaluating the success, really the only 2 measurable metrics are box office and awards.

Titanic dominated both the box office and the academy awards, probably more so than any other movie.
Posted by NOSTRODAMUS
Prairieville/Dutchtown
Member since Dec 2003
16206 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

. Titanic sucked Aliens 2 sucked The abyss sucked


0/3
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram