- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wr had 2 hands on it the whole time = td
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:49 pm to Eighteen
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:49 pm to Eighteen
quote:
once again, it is not a race to the ground
Actually it is. The first to come down to the ground with possession makes the catch. 1 foot down during a catch = College football. 2 feet down for NFL. Back is the same as 2 feet. He had his back on the ground before 2 feet were on the ground for the defender.
2
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:51 pm to ssgtiger
That picture is late in the play.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:52 pm to 10888bge
you are wrong, if you can't read the rule (which is posted on the last page) I can't help you
you are talking about a catch...simultaneous possession is a starting point
whoever gets both hands on it first, as long as they land it is theirs...you cannot come in after a player has two hands on the ball and just add your hands and it be a catch
you are talking about a catch...simultaneous possession is a starting point
whoever gets both hands on it first, as long as they land it is theirs...you cannot come in after a player has two hands on the ball and just add your hands and it be a catch
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:52 pm to BeaumontBengal
Look get honest and watch the play again.
I wanted Seattle to win but right is right.. That was so wrong.
The packers guy clearly has it to his chest. Tate threw it an arm every now and then.. but it wasn't simultaneous.. and Tate never came up with it.
I wanted Seattle to win but right is right.. That was so wrong.
The packers guy clearly has it to his chest. Tate threw it an arm every now and then.. but it wasn't simultaneous.. and Tate never came up with it.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:52 pm to BeaumontBengal
The ref who could see the ball made the right call. The other guy, behind Tate, blew it. The int was against his chest with Tate slapping at it.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:53 pm to 10888bge
Tate took his right hand off the ball during the play
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:53 pm to Eighteen
quote:
you are wrong, if you can't read the rule (which is posted on the last page) I can't help you
you are talking about a catch...simultaneous possession is a starting point
whoever gets both hands on it first, as long as they land it is theirs...you cannot come in after a player has two hands on the ball and just add your hands and it be a catch
fricking this. So much this. If someone argues after reading this, then I don't know how they function in everyday life
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:54 pm to BeaumontBengal
seriously, just read this slowly
the bolded point is exactly what happened on this play.
quote:
Rule 8, Article 3, Item 5: If a pass is caught simulataneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers. It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control.
the bolded point is exactly what happened on this play.
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:56 pm to Eighteen
Does "gain control" mean catch the ball?
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:57 pm to BeaumontBengal
This mother fricker is trolling all of you hard.
Anyone that knows or watches football knows that is not a catch.
I RA'd.
Anyone that knows or watches football knows that is not a catch.
I RA'd.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:57 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:
Does "gain control" mean catch the ball?
no it means GAINS CONTROL
it does not say "come down with a completed catch" or "comes down with both feet first" or anything you keep bringing up
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:58 pm to BeaumontBengal
Um, yes.
Gain control means two hands on the ball with the ball against your chest, in this case.
Gain control means two hands on the ball with the ball against your chest, in this case.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:58 pm to UltimateHog
Not a troll. Just stating that I don't think it's a catch until you get both feet on the ground. By then, the wr had two hands on the ball.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 11:58 pm to UltimateHog
I missed the play and havent seen a video but I had at least 10 people on my FB say it was the worst call ever (many from people that rarely post anything)
eta: just saw it. Holy shite that was bad
eta: just saw it. Holy shite that was bad
This post was edited on 9/25/12 at 12:00 am
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:01 am to BeaumontBengal
quote:
Not a troll. Just stating that I don't think it's a catch until you get both feet on the ground. By then, the wr had two hands on the ball.
READ
THE
RULE
You are obviously trolling your arse off because you ignore the rule that has been posted.
Simultaneous!!!!
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:03 am to BeaumontBengal
Imagine this, if you will.
The laws of gravity are suspended for one play.
Touching the ground does not play into this at all.
The rule is not concerned with the ground at all.
If the defensive player had come down on top of the offensive player and no part of his body touched the ground, he gained possession first, thus it is an interception.
The laws of gravity are suspended for one play.
Touching the ground does not play into this at all.
The rule is not concerned with the ground at all.
If the defensive player had come down on top of the offensive player and no part of his body touched the ground, he gained possession first, thus it is an interception.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:03 am to UltimateHog
The instant Tate took his right hand off the ball he lost the case for simultaneous control
The end
The end
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:05 am to Eighteen
quote:
you are talking about a catch...simultaneous possession is a starting point
It wasn't simultaneous!
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:05 am to Sterling Archer
you are acting like Tate had his hands on the ball the whole time, when, in reality, his right arm was off the ball even after both men were on the ground. His left arm is not visible, but given what we know about the rest of the play, what his left hand is doing is irrelevant.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:06 am to BeaumontBengal
"it's not simultaneous control, it's just not" Steve Young
Bedtime
Bedtime
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News