Started By
Message

re: Why do Americans tolerate socialist, monopolistic sports leagues?

Posted on 4/11/15 at 10:59 pm to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84849 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

its capitalism.


monopolies are, by definition, enemies of capitalism.


quote:

its a compromise between the labor union and the billionaire boys club.


Well #1 If it were up to me i would abolish all the players unions as well but #2 Why should the players unions speak for future players considering the unions objectives are naturally going to be opposed to the interests of those future players?
Posted by LSUTigerfaninHtown
President of the OT as of 5/26/11
Member since Nov 2008
24252 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

that's not a viable alternative and you know it

The Canadian Football League exists, as well. I'm not saying that these are ideal alternatives, but they do exist.
quote:

#1 "The NFL", according to the Supreme Court, is not a single entity.

I wasn't aware of this, until this thread. That being said, is the NFL's monopoly being protected by the government? If not, it's up to someone else to create competition.
quote:

#2 Am I to take it that you would be okay with my engineer or lawyer hypothetical?


Of course not. I see no reason why every company, in their respective fields, would collude and institute a draft, as that would be counterproductive. If that were to happen, though, nothing is stopping competition from sprouting up (assuming the government isn't facilitating the monopoly).
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84849 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

That being said, is the NFL's monopoly being protected by the government?


The NFL is protected under anti-trust law so yes, it is.

quote:

Of course not.


So you're okay with it when it's athletes who make a bunch of money but you're not okay with it when the same principles are theoretically applied to white collar professions? Hypocrite much?
This post was edited on 4/11/15 at 11:04 pm
Posted by LSUTigerfaninHtown
President of the OT as of 5/26/11
Member since Nov 2008
24252 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

So you're okay with it when it's athletes who make a bunch of money but you're not okay with it when the same principles are theoretically applied to white collar professions? Hypocrite much?

You're putting words into my mouth. I said that it's up to other individuals to create competition. It's not my fault that the NFL excels at what it does and that others can't offer equal or better opportunities.


ETA:

quote:

The NFL is protected under anti-trust law so yes, it is.


Then that would be a problem. Governments should not be in the business of facilitating monopolies.
This post was edited on 4/11/15 at 11:06 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84849 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

I said that it's up to other individuals to create competition. It's not my fault that the NFL excels at what it does and that others can't offer equal or better opportunities.


Like I said, the NFL's monopoly is protected under federal anti-trust law.
Posted by LSUTigerfaninHtown
President of the OT as of 5/26/11
Member since Nov 2008
24252 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

Then that would be a problem. Governments should not be in the business of facilitating monopolies.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 11:08 pm to
You can make the argument monopolies are a product of capitalism.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 11:10 pm to
The government didn't stop the USFL or the XFL from competing with the NFL...
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84849 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

The government didn't stop the USFL or the XFL from competing with the NFL...


no but it does give the NFL even more competitive advantages than it would already have just by virtue of being the 100 year old league.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 4/11/15 at 11:18 pm to
There's your crony capitalism, but it still doesn't mandate Jameis Winstom has to play in a certain league.

The government simply tolerates more overt collusion than it would in another industry. But hey, crony capitalism is one of the foundations of this great nation
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:00 am to
quote:

Wrong, the NFL is a non-profit and pays no taxes. Dallas is the company.


You do understand not for profits still file articles of incorporation, right?
This post was edited on 4/12/15 at 12:01 am
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55446 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:19 am to
quote:

socialist


The fans own the means of production?

quote:

monopolistic


We are forced to accept the established leagues?

quote:

Artificial limits on employee salaries


Determined by private parties?

quote:

limits on employee movement


Determined by private parties?

quote:

even conscription via the "draft" system


Forced against their will?

quote:

Why?


frick off.

Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76476 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:20 am to
quote:

hy do Americans tolerate socialist, monopolistic sports leagues?
The NFL has welcomed competition.

They just keep winning.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27423 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:25 am to
I hope this is a trolling thread because if not....



This post was edited on 4/12/15 at 12:28 am
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25862 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 12:37 am to
My overlysimplified and dumb opinion.

More competitive = more fans = more money for all.

Sounds capitalist.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27423 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:14 am to
LINK

LINK

LINK

LINK

LINK


This post was edited on 4/12/15 at 1:19 am
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:25 am to
quote:

Yet it's not only accepted it's championed by many. Why?


because sports fans are not rational thinkers. Some of it is due to historical and cultural connections with teams.
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24466 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:43 am to
quote:

Artificial limits on employee salaries, limits on employee movement and even conscription via the "draft" system. It's an afront to the free market and completely un-American. Yet it's not only accepted it's championed by many. Why?



it's a very valid and thought out question and from the first page of replies you're not getting dick for good responses.

I think people put up with it because it gives them what they want. frick how the meat gets made, just give me the meat.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27423 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 1:52 am to
quote:

it's a very valid and thought out question


You think that Tigerdroppings.com is the first place this "valid and thought out question" has been proposed and worked through?



Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24466 posts
Posted on 4/12/15 at 2:16 am to
great point
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram