re: Why didn't the saints use Peterson?

quote:

---

Because he's a child abuser.
I don't think this is correct, just a hunch.

---

Adrian Peterson beat a 6 yr old with a switch in the genitals so badly the kid went to ICU.

I know you support the abuse of a childs genitals, but frick man.

quote:

---

Adrian Peterson beat a 6 yr old with a switch in the genitals so badly the kid went to ICU.

I know you support the abuse of a childs genitals, but frick man.

---

So your hot take is that the Saints signed a child abuser but did not play the child abuser because he is a child abuser?


Brilliant!!!!

quote:

---

Why didn't the saints use Peterson?

---

quote:

---

Because he's a child abuser.

---

quote:

---

I don't think this is correct, just a hunch. 

---

quote:

---

I know you support the abuse of a childs genitals, but frick man.

---

your logic is pretty incredible . Wtf

quote:

---

your logic is pretty incredible

---

There's literally no one on this message board that it's easier to make look stupid than that poster.

Granted, he does 99.9% of the work himself.

quote:

---

I dont speak SC6 leBrony twitter.

Can you use english?

---

You think the reason the Saints didn't play Peterson more was because he's a child abuser.

So why'd they sign him, genius?

quote:

---

So why'd they sign him, genius?

---

lots of people are signed and then never play for a myriad of reasons.

Im suggesting he wasnt played because he's a child abuser.

Let's take your other hero, Kapernick, for example.

He is a child abuser.

I dont think thats funny.

quote:

---

So your hot take is that the Saints signed a child abuser but did not play the child abuser because he is a child abuser?

---

They took one for the league

quote:

---

that the Saints knew they wouldn't play a child abuser, but still decided to sign a child abuser.

---

perhaps they signed the child abuser, believing at the time, due to other players NOT having been signed yet...hmmm who could that be.....that they needed him and were willing to overlook his child abuse.

Then upon signing someone else....hmmm who could that be....decided not to play him because he's a child abuser.

We know 2 facts.
1. AP is a child abuser
2. He did not play.

quote:

---

perhaps they signed the child abuser, believing at the time, due to other players NOT having been signed yet...hmmm who could that be.....that they needed him and were willing to overlook his child abuse.

Then upon signing someone else....hmmm who could that be....decided not to play him because he's a child abuser.

We know 2 facts.
1. AP is a child abuser
2. He did not play.

---

Perhaps you were dropped on your head as a kid.


Also, your #2 is factually incorrect. Gonna have to try to make another terrible, failed point.