- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are people acting like Adrian Peterson was punching his son in the face?
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:20 pm to monsterballads
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:20 pm to monsterballads
I see people are falling for that bullshite leaves story hook, line and sinker. No way a 4 year old is able to comprehend that. Quick question if this happened in May why is AP just getting indicted now?
3
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:21 pm to abellsujr
quote:
I even posted it a couple of pages back. All they have to do is read.
no one wants to read the police report
they just want to downplay what AP did and equate it to spanking. which it was not. that's not being honest at all. the evidence is there. beating your kid while stuffing leaves in his mouth so he can't scream is incredibly insane.
no justification for it. none.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:21 pm to Louisianimal83
quote:
bull shite leaves story
the BS story that's in the police report?
that one?
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:22 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
In the context the analysts were talking about it means physical.
Regardless of how you interpret it, the word "injury" works here. My advice to you, stop watching ESPN if it bothers you so much. Also, don't let little things like this bother you.
I can't believe you've argued this for so long. Are you this bored?
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:22 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
I'm simply saying it's not accurate to describe the injuries as "severe".
1. You're basing this off of pictures of the injuries after healing for a week.
2. That is absolutely severe in the context of a 4 year old.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:23 pm to Louisianimal83
quote:
No way a 4 year old is able to comprehend that.
Your children must be dumb. My baby girl would absolutely know someone stuffed leaves in her mouth and could easily articulate it to me or her mother.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:24 pm to monsterballads
quote:Your whole post is a straw-man.
no one wants to read the police report
they just want to downplay what AP did and equate it to spanking. which it was not. that's not being honest at all. the evidence is there. beating your kid while stuffing leaves in his mouth so he can't scream is incredibly insane.
no justification for it. none.
* I'm not downplaying what AP did.
* I'm not equating it to spanking.
* I'm not saying it isn't "insane".
* And I'm not saying there is any justification for it.
I argued none of those things. Yet people keep bringing these arguments up as if it is relevant to what I have been saying.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:25 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:Severe abuse. Yes.
That is absolutely severe in the context of a 4 year old.
Severe injuries. No.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:25 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
* I'm not downplaying what AP did.
* I'm not equating it to spanking.
* I'm not saying it isn't "insane".
* And I'm not saying there is any justification for it.
Your position seems a bit convoluted.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:25 pm to Louisianimal83
quote:Oh, I see. People are now starting to say that the police report is a lie. Well, AP admitted that he hit him in the scrotum through a text message. Is that a lie, too?
I see people are falling for that bullshite leaves story hook, line and sinker. No way a 4 year old is able to comprehend that. Quick question if this happened in May why is AP just getting indicted now?
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:26 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
Severe injuries. No.
To a 4 year old, yes. If someone did that to my girl, I would consider it quite severe.
Look, I think you're way too hung up on the semantics at play here. You admit that it is severe abuse, but you are holding so tightly onto the semantics of "severe injury."
This post was edited on 9/15/14 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:27 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
This is where he tells you age doesn't matter.
This thread is funny.
This thread is funny.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:29 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:My position is very clear.
Your position seems a bit convoluted.
The actual injuries are not severe injuries, so people should stop describing the actual injuries as severe.
AP went overboard, it was abuse, it was violent, it was mental abuse, it was wrong and disturbing, especially to do that to a 4 year old.... I agree with all of that. But putting that emotion aside, all I am saying is that people keep describing the actual injuries as severe, when they are not.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:31 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:OK, so should he be suspended? Should he be indicted?
My position is very clear. The actual injuries are not severe injuries, so people should stop describing the actual injuries as severe. AP went overboard, it was abuse, it was violent, it was mental abuse, it was wrong and disturbing, especially to do that to a 4 year old.... I agree with all of that. But putting that emotion aside, all I am saying is that people keep describing the actual injuries as severe, when they are not.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:31 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Look, I think you're way too hung up on the semantics at play here. You admit that it is severe abuse, but you are holding so tightly onto the semantics of "severe injury."
I've already told him that "injury" works in this case. Because the word doesn't have to mean physical harm. It can just mean wrongdoing. His response was that the analysts were using in the context of physical harm. I mean this debate is going nowhere. I'm with you, it's crazy how this bothers him so much.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:33 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
The actual injuries are not severe injuries, so people should stop describing the actual injuries as severe.
Well it's not going to happen, so let it go.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:35 pm to PrimeTime Money
Congrats on arguing semantics so well for 8 pages. There is literally no purpose to a single one of your posts in here.
"It was horrible and abusive and egregious but DONT frickING CALL IT SEVERE DAMNIT!!"
"It was horrible and abusive and egregious but DONT frickING CALL IT SEVERE DAMNIT!!"
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:37 pm to bwallcubfan
quote:It doesn't "bother me so much". This is a forum, and I posed a question and responded to those who responded to me.
I've already told him that "injury" works in this case. Because the word doesn't have to mean physical harm. It can just mean wrongdoing. His response was that the analysts were using in the context of physical harm. I mean this debate is going nowhere. I'm with you, it's crazy how this bothers him so much.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 5:37 pm to PrimeTime Money
okPosted on 9/15/14 at 5:38 pm to lsu2006
quote:Didn't argue that either. The abuse can be described as severe. The injuries are not.
"It was horrible and abusive and egregious but DONT frickING CALL IT SEVERE DAMNIT!!"
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News