Started By
Message

Why are field-goal kickers so much more accurate today?

Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:23 pm
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:23 pm
Morten Andersen, a should be Hall of Famer and perennial all pro, was at about 80%. That was a rarity 20 and 30 years ago- 1980's. Now it seems the norm is 80% or greater, even with the fatties. What gives?

EDT: Andersen used to be #2 all time. He is now #51
quote:

51 Morten Andersen 79.690% 1982-2007
This post was edited on 1/21/17 at 9:07 pm
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
47372 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:26 pm to
More indoor stadiums, balls are shaped more obligated, movement into soccer style kickers as opposed to straight up, and greater specialization.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53028 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:28 pm to
I'm assuming this is for pros? The perception at the college level is that these guys are as bad as ever. I'm not sure if the numbers back that up. Back on the pros, the PAT thing is probably screwing with everyone, thinking these guys suck at an easy kick.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25059 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:28 pm to
The use of so-called K balls.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18981 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:31 pm to
1. Special Balls
2. Position is specialized(as are long snappers)
3. More indoor stadiums
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:33 pm to
When did the chance to specialized kicking balls take place?
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
47372 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

The perception at the college level is that these guys are as bad as ever. I'm not sure if the numbers back that up.


LSU missed like eight field goals in a game once in the 1950s at Florida. PAT were barely made over 50-60%.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

movement into soccer style kickers as opposed to straight up,

In the 80s and early 90s there might have been one straight up kicker in the NFL. And all the soccer style kickers were all only kicking. I don't think there's been any changes in the shape of the ball since then. Since the 50s and 60s and 70s sure
This post was edited on 1/21/17 at 8:54 pm
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34603 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:00 pm to
I'll throw in better coaching. Way back in the day, kickers were left alone to do their own thing. If they had a problem, they often had to figure their way out of it themselves.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25059 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:00 pm to
The current K Ball protocol dates to 2008, I think.
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
47372 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

I don't think there's been any changes in the shape of the ball since then


There have been
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:04 pm to
Interesting article here:
quote:


They benefit from better athleticism than their predecessors, come almost exclusively from soccer backgrounds, are aided by an increased emphasis on special teams and rule changes, and even by playing some of their games indoors.

It all adds up to greater accuracy, especially from long distances.

The success rate has risen steadily from all distances, short and long, during the Super Bowl era, according to STATS LCC.

In 1967, for instance, barely 51 percent of all field goal attempts were good. Today, that figure is 81 percent.

The rise in precision from 50 yards and greater has been especially dramatic:

1960s: 13.1 percent

1970s: 21.6 percent

1980s: 35.6 percent

1990s: 47.8 percent

2000s: 53.0 percent

LINK
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
47372 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:05 pm to
That article gives every reason I made in my original response.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:06 pm to
Are the K balls actually different? I thought maybe they were just balls that were arbitrarily separated (eta: to prevent the tampering that kickers used to do with the balls). I heard on the radio once that kickers used to be able to keep the balls that they kicked, and they would prep the balls. Apparently the thing was that more beat up balls were better for kicking, so kickers would put them through a drying machine.
This post was edited on 1/21/17 at 9:11 pm
Posted by MasterofTigerBait
Member since May 2009
7592 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:07 pm to
I thought kickers didn't like the K balls?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

That article gives every reason I made in my original response.


yeah.

BTW, Andersen used to be #2 all time. He is now #51
quote:

51 Morten Andersen 79.690% 1982-2007
Posted by WillieD
Lafayette/BR
Member since Apr 2014
2009 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 10:23 pm to
Every position is more accurate.
Posted by David Ricky
Hailing From Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2015
24182 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 10:25 pm to
Wow. In twenty years at this rate, you'll see kickers drilling it from 60+ with regularity
Posted by Vegas Eddie
The Quad
Member since Dec 2013
5975 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 10:31 pm to
H
G
H
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 10:36 pm to
HGH makes kickers more accurate?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram