Started By
Message

Why are Black quarterbacks considered a "symbol of progress" for society?

Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:00 pm
Posted by Asphodel
Member since Jan 2016
820 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:00 pm
Like in this article:

https://deadspin.com/the-big-book-of-black-quarterbacks-1517763742

quote:

This project started with my dad on Thanksgiving. He was reminiscing about Doug Williams, who in 1988 became the first black quarterback to start and win a Super Bowl. All these years later, he was still proud of Williams, whose name to some may be that of a half-remembered player from the past but to millions of others remains a powerful symbol of progress. It stayed with me, and it seemed that it was worth telling the story not just of Williams, but of everyone—of all those generations of players who struggled so that Russell Wilson could be, simply, a good young quarterback.



Now, correct me if I'm wrong... but isn't the NFL 70% Black? Are people seriously acting like it's some great injustice that there are few Black quarterbacks relative to White quarterbacks?

Do we strive for this same "progress" when it comes to White wide-receivers or running backs? Is that a symbol of "progress"?

It just seems stupid to act like this is a problem when the league is 70% Black.
Posted by Edearl Watson
Parts Unknown
Member since May 2012
6782 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:01 pm to
The struggle is real
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118936 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:03 pm to
Are white defensive backs a symbol of progress?
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38370 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:03 pm to
Can we not do this
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70890 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:04 pm to
In the bad old days it was conventional wisdom that black people weren't smart enough to be quarterbacks, and any black QB who joined an integrated team could expect to be moved to another position.
Posted by Asphodel
Member since Jan 2016
820 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

Can we not do this

We're doing it.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123594 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:05 pm to
Can we get a dominant white small forward please.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59690 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:06 pm to
Give Sam dekker 2 yrs
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127381 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:08 pm to
Now give us a percentage of black QBs.




Am I doing this right?
Posted by Asphodel
Member since Jan 2016
820 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

In the bad old days it was conventional wisdom that black people weren't smart enough to be quarterbacks, and any black QB who joined an integrated team could expect to be moved to another position.
And it's conventional wisdom that White people aren't athletic enough to play skill positions.

I don't see people celebrating Wes Welker as a symbol of progress.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52746 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

In the bad old days it was conventional wisdom that black people weren't smart enough to be quarterbacks, and any black QB who joined an integrated team could expect to be moved to another position.



Would've saved a shitty thread if OP actually knew this (i.e. history).
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38370 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:10 pm to
Larry Legend?

Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Are white defensive backs a symbol of progress?
Gender bending is the standard for progress for white athletes.
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:11 pm to
Because when football was integrated white coaches said that blacks weren't smart enough to play MLB and QB. If you look at the amount of black qbs that have started in the league you will see the progression
This post was edited on 1/27/16 at 8:13 pm
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:14 pm to
MSB has become the poly board
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
16833 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:16 pm to
Seems like the people wants diversity only pushes for it for high status jobs. With the NFL, it's QBs and head coaches. No one ever fights for diversity for low status positions like punter, centers, long snapper. So it's doesn't make sense when you want diversity in some areas(the good ones) and not others.

Same thing with feminists. You ever hear about shortage of women in construction or plumbing? You always hear about top jobs like CEOs.

So when you want diversity in some area but not others, you're not truly for diversity.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123594 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:16 pm to
Thank you sir, may I have another
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:21 pm to
Doesn't LSU have a black kicker or punter. They also had a white WR
Posted by forksup
Member since Dec 2013
8817 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:23 pm to
We never talk about Polynesians though
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
16833 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 8:27 pm to
They do. But you don't hear "we need more black punters". Instead we hear "there's not enough black coaches". That's not diversity. That's just choosing your cake and eating it.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram