- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which NFL player would command the most draft picks in a trade?
Posted on 7/31/15 at 12:52 pm to KosmoCramer
Posted on 7/31/15 at 12:52 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:Alright, Jaws. I hate that saying so much
The NFL is a QB driven league
0
Posted on 7/31/15 at 12:53 pm to PeteRose
The short answer is probably Andrew Luck but I think quite a few teams would give up more for Rodgers.
Posted on 7/31/15 at 1:01 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
sure. 10 years, $150m total guaranteed. In year 7, 8, 9, and 10, paying $15M/yr will be a bargain for any QB, much less a potential GOAT
I'm thinking more along the lines of 7 years, $154 million fully guaranteed.
Posted on 7/31/15 at 1:20 pm to Bench McElroy
1. Rodgers
2. Luck
3. begins to get interesting...
2. Luck
3. begins to get interesting...
Posted on 7/31/15 at 1:49 pm to PeteRose
I'd say Rodgers would probably get more, as he's under contract for longer. Luck is not forced to resign with a team, and could only be a rental. It's debatable of he's a top 5 QB next year. It would be hard to justify a king's ransom if you're forced to use the tag on him for 3 years.
Posted on 7/31/15 at 2:07 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
It's debatable of he's a top 5 QB next year
Posted on 7/31/15 at 2:12 pm to SwaggerCopter
quote:
When you pronounce this IRL, do you actually not pronounce the n? I've never met someone like that, but there are so many posters who never get this right, that I'm honestly just curious.
He actually used the wrong word. It should be dominant. You should pronounce the n in either one.
Posted on 7/31/15 at 2:35 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
sure. 10 years, $150m total guaranteed. In year 7, 8, 9, and 10, paying $15M/yr will be a bargain for any QB, much less a potential GOAT
I think you can only sign up to a 6 or 7 year contract in the current CBA
Posted on 7/31/15 at 2:38 pm to Tigerfan56
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/3/15 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 7/31/15 at 2:56 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
I'd say Rodgers would probably get more, as he's under contract for longer.
I would say Luck since he still on his rookie contract & Rodgers is the highest paid player in the NFL.
Posted on 7/31/15 at 3:51 pm to PeteRose
quote:
3. JJ Watt - most dominate defensive player.
It's "dominant" for the love of all things holy.
Posted on 7/31/15 at 5:13 pm to PeteRose
I agree with 1 and 2, in that order as well, but #3 would have to be a QB. No good QB wins as few games as the Texans did. A single DE simply isn't nearly as valuable.
Hard to say who the 3rd QB is though, considering age. Peyton, Brady, and Brees probably only have a few years left each. Romo is 35. Rivers and Roethlisberger are 32, I think. 35 is generally the age most QB's really decline, so hard to see Rivers or Roethlisberger being worth that much. Who are among the next crop of great QB's in the under 30 crowd? Luck is the only one that is a sure thing.
Hard to say who the 3rd QB is though, considering age. Peyton, Brady, and Brees probably only have a few years left each. Romo is 35. Rivers and Roethlisberger are 32, I think. 35 is generally the age most QB's really decline, so hard to see Rivers or Roethlisberger being worth that much. Who are among the next crop of great QB's in the under 30 crowd? Luck is the only one that is a sure thing.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News