- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:54 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Was Miami cheated out of back to backs?
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:56 pm to Muahahaha
quote:
Muahahaha
Update your frickING SIG BRAHHH!
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:58 pm to UnAnon
Was the rest of the college football world cheated out of potential talent because Miami was purchasing players?
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:00 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
This was the play on 3rd down with 2 minutes left to seal the game, it wasn't called pass interference and was called incomplete.
that video doesn't help your case at all
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:01 pm to skullhawk
quote:
that video doesn't help your case at all
Two holds and a completed pass?
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:02 pm to KosmoCramer
Korin and Kosmo,
Thanks for reminding me!!! How could I forget!!!!!
Thanks for reminding me!!! How could I forget!!!!!
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:02 pm to skullhawk
quote:
that video doesn't help your case at all
The pass to Gamble was an obvious completion on the replay. Would've given OSU a first down and game over.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:55 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Miami should have gone back-to-back in 2000 and 2001.
Indeed.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:59 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Two holds and a completed pass?
Gamble got away clean and had an opportunity to make the catch. Flag would have been thrown if he wouldn't have been able to make that separation. We can't go back to review tape and erase plays that have jersey holding. There would be no football.
As far as being in-bounds, it certainly isn't definitive from that angle.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:07 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
Indeed.
Then what about Washington?
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:15 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Miami should have gone back-to-back in 2000 and 2001.
One-loss Miami beat #1 Florida State in the middle of the regular season and did not lose again. Then FSU leapfrogged Miami November 20th in the BCS after Florida State beat Florida and Miami dropped to 3.
Miami's only loss that year was week 2 at Washington in Seattle. Washington finished #3 in the final AP poll.
Miami would have killed the Josh Heupel Oklahoma team in 2000. And it would have been in Miami to boot.
So yes, they were that close to back-to-back-to-back.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:22 pm to lsutigers1992
quote:
One-loss Miami beat #1 Florida State in the middle of the regular season and did not lose again. Then FSU leapfrogged Miami November 20th in the BCS after Florida State beat Florida and Miami dropped to 3.
Miami's only loss that year was week 2 at Washington in Seattle. Washington finished #3 in the final AP poll.
Could say that Washington got robbed then since they beat Miami. Right?
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:36 pm to RedHawk
quote:
Could say that Washington got robbed then since they beat Miami. Right?
And also beat #3 Oregon State. Their only loss was @ #8 Oregon.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:41 pm to skullhawk
quote:So the guy holds twice (obvious hold at that), but because Gamble broke free it doesn't warrant a flag? Couldn't that have impacted how clean the catch was? Regardless the point is that they got lucky they didn't get a call, which would have ended the game. So when they get unlucky on a similar call (still was clear contact anyways) that kept the game going, it seems that at worst it's a wash.
Gamble got away clean and had an opportunity to make the catch. Flag would have been thrown if he wouldn't have been able to make that separation. We can't go back to review tape and erase plays that have jersey holding. There would be no football.
This post was edited on 1/20/15 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:42 pm to buckeye_vol
And they can't blame the refs for not being able to punch it in from the goal line in the second ot.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:45 pm to RedHawk
quote:
Could say that Washington got robbed then since they beat Miami. Right?
I think Miami had the best claim and Washington had the worst and I had no dog in the fight. Of Miami/FSU/Washington, Washington had the worst loss of the bunch. They lost at Oregon, who was top-ten but the 3rd best team in the Pac 10.
And in 2000, the Pac 10 was unusually horrific. It had 3 top 10 teams (Washington, Oregon State, Oregon), and then Stanford finished 4th and was not even bowl eligible. No other team was better than 6-6. Washington didn't face a team with a winning record between October 7 and their bowl game, and they won the majority of those games by a touchdown or less.
This post was edited on 1/20/15 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:49 pm to lsutigers1992
Does everyone forget just how heavily favored Miami was vs Ohio St.? It was brutal how little chance the Buckeyes were given. Not that it's relevant to the call but I have a hard time feeling bad for a team that loses in OT to a team they were supposed to blow out.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News