re: Tulane's Giving Itself A Huge DISADVANTAGE In Yulman Stadium?

quote:

---

the playing field is just terribly slanted against a little guy with a smaller budget

---

You're putting them on the wrong playing field for some reason. They're not on center stage and aren't trying to be, and they shouldn't.

quote:

---

A program someone on either coast who loves the sport would consider interesting to talk about for positive reasons.

---

This is like 20 programs in a given year, none who are in the AAC.

quote:

---

Surely you don't argue going to a bowl means relevance.

---

Your definition of relevance is unobtainable by most football programs.

quote:

---

The lesser bowls often cost their schools more to attend than they generate in revenue.

---

The bigger ones usually do too.

quote:

---

A 20K stadium is just a waste of space and donor money that won't do anything more than obligate them to throw more good money after bad in the future. They should completely change course and move to a lower division, stop pretending they are more like LSU than Williams and readjust their approach to their athletics.

---

They aren't competing with SMU not LSU, that's why they built a similar stadium.

quote:

---

They (Tulane) presently have a completely stupid and inadequate situation in full blown retard mode going on at Tulane. A 20K stadium is just a waste of space and donor money that won't do anything more than obligate them to throw more good money after bad in the future. They should completely change course and move to a lower division, stop pretending they are more like LSU than Williams and readjust their approach to their athletics.

---

Ridiculous.
What they are trying to do is play competitive ball - like all but 20 teams in the NCAA are trying to do. They aren't trying to be like LSU and they haven't since WWII. Their trying to be like 80% of the schools who play ball and meet their academic mission.
As for the stadium, at the current price points at which they are able to sell the seats, it is going to bring in more money than many 35K stadiums. They aren't filling stands with 10K students and another 5k $10 escort tickets.
No they aren't going to compete for national titles - just like all but about 20 other teams.
Regardless, TU is a private school using its own money.

As for basketball, they have to recruit nationally; heck, LSU has to recruit nationally. There's no culture in this state for LSU basketball like there is for football. And the level of talent isn't here.

quote:

---

What they are trying to do is play competitive ball

---

exactly what they should be doing. in a lower division. with other schools with similar mission statements and limitations.

I think majority of midmajors should get out of the top division of football because the inflation of costs is getting more and more out of hand - but for a school like Tulane I think the choice is even more obvious. Emulate a Princeton, not a SMU

quote:

---

If we use your reasoning the only schools that should compete at the D1 level would be limited to 20 schools

---

If you use my logic the only schools that should compete at the D1 level should be somewhere between 40 and 60 odd schools. Those schools are in the major conferences (PAC, Big 10, SEC, ACC, Big 12, or major independent/partial ACC Notre Dame) with more substantial revenues.

This is what is in the process of happening right now anyway. Their revenues have skyrocketed over the last 20 years (esp the SEC and Big 10). Their extra revenues in turn have led to the stadium expansions, facility improvements, increases in coaches salaries etc which further separate those schools from the "have nots" we call midmajors.

Even with getting the leftover talent in this state, Tulane should be a 7 win team every year. Playing in the dome gives them a recruiting advantage over a Southern Miss, ULL or McNeese. I also believe that they should beg , borrow or steal to play LSU every year. Playing the Tigers guarantees at least a top 15 opponent and big game atmosphere every year. Couple this with playing in an NFL stadium that a Bama or Ole Miss would visit, both fan bases love NO, and you may sway some athletes in their direction.

quote:

---

With that said I think there is a place for the mid major to be in the same division as the power conferences.

---

To me whether they are in a lower division or if they are in the same division but come to terms with the differences in their limitations probably doesn't matter very much. The new playoff system is unlikely to let in a midmajor candidate because there are going to be five major conference champs and 1-2 deserving at larges who will get more favorable consideration IMO.

There have been some fun and even strong midmajors who deserved credit in recent years like the Utah, TCU, and Boise programs in the last decade. If there had been a four team playoff there were probably two years where my sense of fairness would have led me to advocate for one of them to be included rather than a second representative from a power conference or a flawed conference champ... but I personally doubt that would have happened and with the exception of a very strong Utah team I think most of the rest of them would have been disposed of immediately anyway (sorry Boise).

Anyway, you should expect push-back when it comes to some of those BCS schools you mention. Schools like Kentucky, Vanderbilt, and MSU are now flush with cash and investing more heavily on top of recruiting better than any of the midmajors for a very long time. They have solid coaches in place and have more talented rosters than people outside of the SEC are likely to realize. Mississippi State is probably regarded as a bad team by teams outside of the SEC but when they play well regarded teams from other conference they have fared very well under DM. Anyway, the teams at the bottom of a conference in a given year aren't the point because they aren't in consideration for a playoff, conference championship, and certainly not a national championship.

IMO you are stuck on the outliers who are midmajors as being the point. At least when it comes to discussing a Tulane type program discussing the few outliers really isn't the point. I'm more interested in what is good for a program like Tulane (and especially Tulane since I have personal connections to the school). What is good for a Tulane is to stop hemorrhaging money on football and slash football expenses to match what should reasonably be expected to be revenue generated. That most likely means you have to drop down to a lower division where a 20K stadium makes sense.

I'll just say with the recent events, i dont think college football is going to change very much. It is not in the P5's interests to drive away the midmajor conferences completely, as their home games and rent a wins are crucial to the records and bottom lines.

I do think if there is a new landscape, it will be the choice of teams to compete in it or not. If UCF or another midmajor wants to follow the big boy's rules, they'll have no choice but to let them. People will still root for the midmajors and watch them on tv...

quote:

---

I'll just say with the recent events, i dont think college football is going to change very much. It is not in the P5's interests to drive away the midmajor conferences completely, as their home games and rent a wins are crucial to the records and bottom lines.

---

Not anymore. With most conferences going to 9 or 10 games in a 12 game season the other two games will home and homes with other P5 conferences since there is a playoffs that will slowly expand to about 8 teams.

quote:

---

Not anymore. With most conferences going to 9 or 10 games in a 12 game season the other two games will home and homes with other P5 conferences since there is a playoffs that will slowly expand to about 8 teams.

---

You may see less OOC games with mid-majors but you will never see a complete elimination of those games.

For instance most mid majors have no problem going to Tiger Stadium with no return date. Even with the occasional road trip to a mid major most or done with a 2 home/ 1 away type deal. Southern Miss went to Nebraska twice without a home game.

Most P5 schools will not play another school without it being home/away or neutral site. If LSU stopped playing mid-majors you would decrease the number of home games from 8 to 7 or 6 (or less). That is a significant loss of revenue that most school will not be willing to take.

On top of that there are plenty of 10-2, 9-3, 8-4 teams that have records severely propped up by weaker competition. Sure fans want to see better teams in their stadiums, but many would stop supporting teams if they started going 4-8, 5-7 or 6-6 every year, which is what would happen with a P5 only schedule.

Playing only P5 schools is a wonderful pipe dream but one that really isn't all that feasible.

quote:

---

. Playing in the dome gives them a recruiting advantage over a Southern Miss, ULL or McNeese

---

no it does not

get it through your skull brah