Started By
Message

re: Tom Brady: Trump's comments were divisive

Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Political commentary is not the role of football players, yet here we are


Wow, the ignorance in the statement is staggering. Maybe you should read the Constitution instead of waving the flag for a change.

The First Amendment gives all Americans, including rich football players the right to say whatever they want. It also explicitly prohibits the government from banning or punishing people for thei speech. So no, the President speaking in an official capacity has no business "suggesting" citizens in a So called free country should be punished because he disagrees with the methods of protest
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84116 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Wow, the ignorance in the statement is staggering.


It's a mirror of your statement, so what does that say about you?

quote:

The First Amendment gives all Americans, including rich football players the right to say whatever they want.


And anyone, including the President can comment on their commenting. Funny that you only seem to care about a certain group's freedoms.

Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Funny that you only seem to care about a certain group's freedoms.



Discrimination!
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84883 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Posting the same bullshite over and over isn't going to make it true


It's true, but the key word is it "may" result in discipline. The NFL is free to do as it pleases in this regard.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71403 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:37 pm to
quote:


The First Amendment gives all Americans, including rich football players the right to say whatever they want. It also explicitly prohibits the government from banning or punishing people for thei speech. So no, the President speaking in an official capacity has no business "suggesting" citizens in a So called free country should be punished because he disagrees with the methods of protest



The first amendment keeps them from being thrown in jail due to their speech. Trump can suggest all day people shouldn't be employed.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95194 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:41 pm to
Honestly guys, this is the main reason I have an issue with this. I unfortunately think the "unfairness" and "injustice" line is used as a crutch from the majority of the minority community. Not all, but most. And when you tell someone since they are little they won't succeed and nothing is their fault, they have no chance

Maybe the coaches and parents in this photo mean well and will make these kids not have a victim mentality, but I don't feel good about it

Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84116 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Maybe the coaches and parents in this photo mean well and will make these kids not have a victim mentality


Good fricking luck with that.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84883 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

And anyone, including the President can comment on their commenting. Funny that you only seem to care about a certain group's freedoms.
They're both free to comment as they see fit, but one of them is the president of the USA, so his words have a bit more gravitas, no?

Regardless, the president suggesting a private business suppress folks with whom he disagrees is a bit concerning. Is he allowed to say it though? Yes.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

The first amendment keeps them from being thrown in jail due to their speech. Trump can suggest all day people shouldn't be employed.


Do you not realize how dangerous and stupid that is? The host of the Apprentice can suggest whatever he wants, the President is duty bound to uphold the Constitution it's not very far from suggesting to demanding people be silenced.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84883 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

The first amendment keeps them from being thrown in jail due to their speech. Trump can suggest all day people shouldn't be employed


Sure he can, but it's not exactly a presidential way of behaving.

It's a bit tyrannical, IMO.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139840 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:45 pm to
Jcorye1 or Pride, serious question is there actual video of where he said this in Alabama? I have just seen it written but not a video.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84116 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

They're both free to comment as they see fit, but one of them is the president of the USA, so his words have a bit more gravitas, no?


Relevance to the discussion I was having?

quote:

Regardless, the president suggesting a private business suppress folks with whom he disagrees is a bit concerning. Is he allowed to say it though? Yes.



If these guys want the attention by kneeling in protest, I don't care if he responds. Not sure why him being President matters.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:47 pm to
cuck.


quote:

Brady was asked if he had ever had conversations with teammates who had questions about his friendship with Trump, and he said that has not happened.
I guarantee you that's horseshite. in fact, that's why he's making this statement.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84883 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

If these guys want the attention by kneeling in protest, I don't care if he responds. Not sure why him being President matters.


President wants someone fired because he doesn't like their commentary. Suggests the private company fire the employee. Company follows through and fires employee due to president's request.

You wouldn't have an issue with that, regardless of the political party of said president?
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

It's a mirror of your statement, so what does that say about you?


Nothing, you seem to not understand the difference between football players and The President.
quote:

And anyone, including the President can comment on their commenting


He was not just commenting he was suggesting they be punished. He holds an office that gives him enormous power and the ability to influence things that regular citizens can not. The whole point of the First Amendment is to allow citizens to criticize the government. When the highest elected official calls for people to lose their jobs because he does not like their methods of protest we are no longer a nation of laws.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84116 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

President wants someone fired because he doesn't like their commentary.


Does that sound familiar?
quote:

You wouldn't have an issue with that, regardless of the political party of said president?



The left has used that tactic forever, so yea I'd love it if it went both ways.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Not sure why him being President matters.


That is unbelievable
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71403 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:50 pm to
quote:


Do you not realize how dangerous and stupid that is? The host of the Apprentice can suggest whatever he wants, the President is duty bound to uphold the Constitution it's not very far from suggesting to demanding people be silenced.



It's stupid to argue he can't do it because "reasons". I don't think it's presidential, and it irritates the hell out of me, but to then turn around and infer he can't do it because of the first amendment is just not true.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84116 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Nothing, you seem to not understand the difference between football players and The President.


They're both Americans, at least I think so.

quote:

He was not just commenting he was suggesting they be punished.


That's called a comment, braniac. Is he not entitled to his opinion?

quote:

The whole point of the First Amendment is to allow citizens to criticize the government


He didn't say they couldn't, and he himself did not keep them from doing it. You suck at this.



Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71403 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:


Sure he can, but it's not exactly a presidential way of behaving.

It's a bit tyrannical, IMO.



Oh I don't disagree with you in the slightest.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram