Started By
Message

re: So now that LA & Las Vegas are filled for the NFL..

Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:44 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/23 at 7:32 am
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15906 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

I actually think Cincinnati might be the next team to move. They don't have a great situation with their stadium

What's wrong with it? It's not even 20 years old and I think they recently installed new video boards and a field-level club.
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
8767 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Oklahoma City.


Posted by RocketPower13
Member since Jan 2017
2480 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:50 pm to
next they'll relocate alabama to Cleveland and move the browns to mexico.
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:57 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/23 at 7:32 am
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:58 pm to
cowherd claims that Jerry Jones backed Vegas to make sure the Raiders did not go to San Antonio.



Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:59 pm to
I believe it.

frick jerry.
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3114 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:20 pm to
San Diego seems like a very desirable location, and to a lesser extent St. Louis does as well.

I personally think it will be either San Diego or London. Many in NFL leadership positions really want London. I think they have done a good bit of planning already. Instead of doing home and away every two weeks they will do a series (probably four at a time) in London and then in the US using a domestic base of operations. Maybe schedule visiting teams to go before their bye week. The logistics are an issue, but not insurmountable, and I think the potential market is too large for the NFL to ignore.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

San Diego


After the way the Chargers left, idk.
Posted by Wooly
Member since Feb 2012
13851 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:23 pm to
Just think of the tax implications for the players on the international team. That would suck arse
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3114 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Just think of the tax implications for the players on the international team. That would suck arse


MLB and NBA do it with Canada.
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3114 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

After the way the Chargers left, idk.


I hear you, but that was no worse than the bitter feelings when the Baltimore Colts went to Indianapolis (unannounced) or when the Cleveland Browns moved to Baltimore to become the Ravens. Probably not even as bad as when the Rams left LA in the first place for St. Louis.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27307 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:29 pm to
Mexico City Ay Carambas
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

Lots of money would have to be spent on security though. the NBA deciding to play one game there is one thing.


The NFL has played games there too

Raiders are playing there again this season vs the Pats
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
17329 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:30 pm to
I thought the Bengals stadium was nice too. I don't see them leaving.
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
9316 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:37 pm to
I'd like to see DeRidder or Crowley land a team. Not sure how I'd feel about a taxpayer-funded stadium but I'd be open to listen to proposals.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73859 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

San Diego


This city has given in to MLS we wont get the nfl anytime soon
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8008 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

San Diego seems like a very desirable location, and to a lesser extent St. Louis does as well.

I personally think it will be either San Diego or London. Many in NFL leadership positions really want London. I think they have done a good bit of planning already. Instead of doing home and away every two weeks they will do a series (probably four at a time) in London and then in the US using a domestic base of operations. Maybe schedule visiting teams to go before their bye week. The logistics are an issue, but not insurmountable, and I think the potential market is too large for the NFL to ignore.


London probably has the best business case by a long shot, but it will be difficult to get the NFLPA to buy in. The NFL will be expanding the pie by quite a bit, and the NFLPA knows that and that it will be a significant stressor on their players. The owners are going to have to fork up if they want to get it done.
Posted by CapperVin
Member since Apr 2013
10546 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

Lots of money would have to be spent on security though. the NBA deciding to play one game there is one thing. But a full NFL team for half the year would be a challenge. Every player would probably have to have security. Unless they just lived in texas and flew to Mexico City for games.

Posted by RocketPower13
Member since Jan 2017
2480 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

quote:
the browns to mexico.


racist


saying that is even more racist
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram