- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So now that LA & Las Vegas are filled for the NFL..
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:44 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:44 pm to StraightCashHomey21
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/23 at 7:32 am
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:46 pm to TheXman
quote:
I actually think Cincinnati might be the next team to move. They don't have a great situation with their stadium
What's wrong with it? It's not even 20 years old and I think they recently installed new video boards and a field-level club.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:50 pm to hsfolk
next they'll relocate alabama to Cleveland and move the browns to mexico.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:57 pm to RocketPower13
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/23 at 7:32 am
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:58 pm to hsfolk
cowherd claims that Jerry Jones backed Vegas to make sure the Raiders did not go to San Antonio.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:59 pm to CelticDog
I believe it.
frick jerry.
frick jerry.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:20 pm to TbirdSpur2010
San Diego seems like a very desirable location, and to a lesser extent St. Louis does as well.
I personally think it will be either San Diego or London. Many in NFL leadership positions really want London. I think they have done a good bit of planning already. Instead of doing home and away every two weeks they will do a series (probably four at a time) in London and then in the US using a domestic base of operations. Maybe schedule visiting teams to go before their bye week. The logistics are an issue, but not insurmountable, and I think the potential market is too large for the NFL to ignore.
I personally think it will be either San Diego or London. Many in NFL leadership positions really want London. I think they have done a good bit of planning already. Instead of doing home and away every two weeks they will do a series (probably four at a time) in London and then in the US using a domestic base of operations. Maybe schedule visiting teams to go before their bye week. The logistics are an issue, but not insurmountable, and I think the potential market is too large for the NFL to ignore.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:21 pm to GumBro Jackson
quote:
San Diego
After the way the Chargers left, idk.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:23 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
Just think of the tax implications for the players on the international team. That would suck arse
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:25 pm to Wooly
quote:
Just think of the tax implications for the players on the international team. That would suck arse
MLB and NBA do it with Canada.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:28 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
After the way the Chargers left, idk.
I hear you, but that was no worse than the bitter feelings when the Baltimore Colts went to Indianapolis (unannounced) or when the Cleveland Browns moved to Baltimore to become the Ravens. Probably not even as bad as when the Rams left LA in the first place for St. Louis.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:44 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
quote:
Lots of money would have to be spent on security though. the NBA deciding to play one game there is one thing.
The NFL has played games there too
Raiders are playing there again this season vs the Pats
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:30 pm to nvasil1
I thought the Bengals stadium was nice too. I don't see them leaving.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:37 pm to hsfolk
I'd like to see DeRidder or Crowley land a team. Not sure how I'd feel about a taxpayer-funded stadium but I'd be open to listen to proposals.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:44 pm to GumBro Jackson
quote:
San Diego
This city has given in to MLS we wont get the nfl anytime soon
Posted on 3/27/17 at 7:02 pm to GumBro Jackson
quote:
San Diego seems like a very desirable location, and to a lesser extent St. Louis does as well.
I personally think it will be either San Diego or London. Many in NFL leadership positions really want London. I think they have done a good bit of planning already. Instead of doing home and away every two weeks they will do a series (probably four at a time) in London and then in the US using a domestic base of operations. Maybe schedule visiting teams to go before their bye week. The logistics are an issue, but not insurmountable, and I think the potential market is too large for the NFL to ignore.
London probably has the best business case by a long shot, but it will be difficult to get the NFLPA to buy in. The NFL will be expanding the pie by quite a bit, and the NFLPA knows that and that it will be a significant stressor on their players. The owners are going to have to fork up if they want to get it done.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 7:06 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
quote:
Lots of money would have to be spent on security though. the NBA deciding to play one game there is one thing. But a full NFL team for half the year would be a challenge. Every player would probably have to have security. Unless they just lived in texas and flew to Mexico City for games.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 8:55 pm to TheIrishFro
quote:
quote:
the browns to mexico.
racist
saying that is even more racist
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News