- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Seattle 2013-14, one of the best Super Bowl teams ever?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:31 am to AlaTiger
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:31 am to AlaTiger
quote:
This is true, though. How does Seattle get away with blatant holding/PI in the secondary on a constant basis, is what I want to know? Not that it would have mattered in the game last night, but it mattered a great deal in the game with the Saints.
They were the most penalized team in the NFL this year
0
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:20 am to LNCHBOX
First game was shite show and the Saints looked lost. I would give a lot of credit to the crowd on that one also, they were relentless and it showed.
The second game started out bad also but 309 yrds and a TD and 0 INTs is not a bad stat line against the best secondary in the league. I wouldn't say that was shutting Brees down is my point.
They held him in check for points of the game but that's not shutting someone down exactly
The second game started out bad also but 309 yrds and a TD and 0 INTs is not a bad stat line against the best secondary in the league. I wouldn't say that was shutting Brees down is my point.
They held him in check for points of the game but that's not shutting someone down exactly
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 11:24 am
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:23 am to SpartyGator
quote:
SpartyGator
coming from a guy with over 24,000 post in 3 years
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:25 am to Throbinhood
quote:
The second game started out bad also but 309 yrds and a TD and 0 INTs is not a bad stat line against the best secondary in the league.
51% of his yards came in the last 5 minutes of the game and it started with that long pass that should have been intercepted.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:32 am to TDawg1313
85 Bears: Better defense, HOF RB, comparable QB
72 Dolphins: Actually shut out the Redskins, only TD came on a Garo Yepremian INT on a blocked FG
Steel Curtain Steelers: Better on D, HOF talent at every skill position on offense
77 Cowboys: Best Cowboys team ever (with apologies to the 90s teams). They sacked Craig Morton like 11 times. Their defensive performance was equally stunning.
72 Dolphins: Actually shut out the Redskins, only TD came on a Garo Yepremian INT on a blocked FG
Steel Curtain Steelers: Better on D, HOF talent at every skill position on offense
77 Cowboys: Best Cowboys team ever (with apologies to the 90s teams). They sacked Craig Morton like 11 times. Their defensive performance was equally stunning.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:37 am to peaster68
I'll take the 2000 Ravens over this defense no question. Overall, it's closer, but I'll still go Ravens.
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 11:38 am
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:43 am to lsutigers1992
quote:
72 Dolphins: Actually shut out the Redskins, only TD came on a Garo Yepremian INT on a blocked FG
The offense was suspect on this team.. I know they had two 1,000 yard rushers.. They got lucky to win the AFC title game that year.. IMO the 1973 Dolphins were better than the 1972 Dolphins...
quote:
Steel Curtain Steelers: Better on D, HOF talent at every skill position on offense
The 1978 Steeler team was the best of the 4....
quote:
85 Bears: Better defense, HOF RB, comparable QB
I think they would crush the Hawks...
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 11:44 am
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:44 am to ohiovol
Ill take the 2000 Ravens Defense like you but I'll def take Seattle overall.
I think they are one of the best. I'm a saints homer and see a great team when I see one. They have chemistry and relish in the villain role, with Harvin their offense was alot better. They don't have the best WRs or TE but Harvin, Skittles and Wilson are elite players on offense. And the defense is one of the best in the last decade easily. Can't really compare different teams to different eras because they are different eras of football and style. I think since 2000 they are very few teams that are better.
I think they are one of the best. I'm a saints homer and see a great team when I see one. They have chemistry and relish in the villain role, with Harvin their offense was alot better. They don't have the best WRs or TE but Harvin, Skittles and Wilson are elite players on offense. And the defense is one of the best in the last decade easily. Can't really compare different teams to different eras because they are different eras of football and style. I think since 2000 they are very few teams that are better.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:46 am to TDawg1313
quote:Should have, could have , would have......
should have
Did he or did he not have 309 yards 1 TD against the best secondary in the league?
quote:
51% of his yards came in the last 5 minutes of the game
All this says is that they knew he was going to pass the ball, and he did when he had too.
They are a great team and helluva defense. One of the fastest defense I've ever seen but they do have some weaknesses in the run.
Like I said, they jumped on teams early which played to their strengths. It would have been interesting to see what Wilson could do when playing behind and the defense having to stop someone's running game
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 11:49 am
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:49 am to Throbinhood
Brees did not play well in that game, regardless of his stat line.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News