Started By
Message

re: Report: Kyrie wants "very badly" to play for the Knicks

Posted on 7/27/17 at 4:59 pm to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83462 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 4:59 pm to
I understand that. I was just talking to Melo vs Kyrie as far as popularity and endorsements go.

Obviously I'm no marketing expert. Just giving my opinion.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59692 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:02 pm to
You seem like a pretty decent one from what I'm reading fwiw
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46191 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

What about Melo? You said yourself he's not the same star level as he was before he got to New York


I didn't say that. He's never been that big of a star besides when he first got in the NBA.

quote:

1.) Kyrie ain't Kobe

I didn't compare them. I used Kobe as an example of having to maintain stardom despite little to no success vs becoming a star.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83462 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:07 pm to
Well I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112329 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

I didn't say that. He's never been that big of a star besides when he first got in the NBA.


Which is universally false

quote:

I didn't compare them. I used Kobe as an example of having to maintain stardom despite little to no success vs becoming a star.


That's literally what a comparison is. You're comparing their stardom, you're comparing their careers, you're comparing their situation. There is no other word for it
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46191 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Which is universally false


It's really not.

quote:

That's literally what a comparison is. You're comparing their stardom, you're comparing their careers


I'm doing none of that. I'm a Lakers fan and a Kobe fan so obviously I wouldn't do either of those things.

quote:

you're comparing their situation. There is no other word for it


I'm saying Kobe went through this situation and had these results. Now Kyrie will go through a similar situation so we should expect similar results.

Saying Kyrie isn't Kobe is in no way relevant to that unless you're saying that you can reach a certain level of stardom where being on a winner or loser team doesn't matter anymore. In that case, you've just pretty much just agreed to my point. We would just be disagreeing about either where that level is or where Kyrie's current level of stardom is which is pretty difficult to define.
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 5:21 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112329 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

I'm saying Kobe went through this situation and had these results. Now Kyrie will go through a similar situation so we should expect similar results.


Your under the assumption that Kyrie is on the same leve as Kobe and will have the same immunity to losing as Kobe. But that's not the case because he is nowhere near Kobes level. (Which is a comparison btw)


quote:

Saying Kyrie isn't Kobe is in no way relevant to that unless you're saying that you can reach a certain level of stardom where being on a winner or loser team doesn't matter anymore. In t


That's prett much the case. If Lebron started losing, his brand would easily survive. There are exceptions to every rule

You seem to think Kyrie is on Lebron and Kobes level. He isn't
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 5:25 pm
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46191 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Your under the assumption that Kyrie is on the same leve as Kobe and will have the same immunity to losing as Kobe. But that's not the case because he is nowhere near Kobes level. (Which is a comparison btw)


I'm not under that assumption.

quote:

That's prett much the case. If Lebron started losing, his brand would easily survive. There are exceptions to every rule

So the only disagreement here is what level of stardom you have to be to see some immunity to being on a losing team
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112329 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

So the only disagreement here is what level of stardom you have to be to see some immunity to being on a losing team


Well seeing as Kyrie has been in the league 5-6 years and hasn't been a universal too 5 player and Kobe and Lebron spent 15-20 years as universal top 5 players in the league, I think we can safely agree that they are on two different planets
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46191 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Well seeing as Kyrie has been in the league 5-6 years and hasn't been a universal too 5 player and Kobe and Lebron spent 15-20 years as universal top 5 players in the league, I think we can safely agree that they are on two different planets

I don't know how many times I have to say I'm not saying Kyrie is on Kobe or Lebrons level.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112329 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:32 pm to
Yet you keep comparing their situations so you could see how I could be confused
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46191 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:36 pm to
I compared the situations to get you to see at some point you become immune to your star level dropping off when you're on a losing team. Then you agreed with that.

Now I'm saying I think the level you have to reach is lower than you think to get that immunity. That point is pretty hard to argue so I'm willing to drop the argument at that point but you keep coming back with Kyrie isn't on Kobes level for some unknown reason. I've never once made that comparison. I'm starting to question your reading comprehension. Up to this point I've been chalking it up to lack of effort.
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 5:39 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112329 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

I compared the situations to


Well atleast you finally admitted it. That's a start

quote:

see at some point you become immune to your star level dropping off when you're on a losing team. Then you agreed with that


I agree that NBA legends are anomalies yes.

quote:

Now I'm saying I think the level you have to reach is lower than you think to get that immunity.


And how does comparing him to Kobe prove that? That's been your only example, please provide some more comparable superstars that have gone through big stretches of not winning and it not effected them.

quote:

you keep coming back with Kyrie isn't on Kobes level for some unknown reas


BECAUSE YOU ARE USING KOBE AS EVIDENCE WHEN IT CLEARLY ISNT A COMPARABLE SITUATION

Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83462 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Saying Kyrie isn't Kobe is in no way relevant to that unless you're saying that you can reach a certain level of stardom where being on a winner or loser team doesn't matter anymore. In that case, you've just pretty much just agreed to my point. We would just be disagreeing about either where that level is or where Kyrie's current level of stardom is which is pretty difficult to define.
I feel like Kyrie is in a weird area here.

Lebron coming to Cle and them doing the 3 finals and 1 championship thing elevated tf out of Kyrie(in the media and with fans). As it would elevate anyone. And it did pretty much help out everyone on the entire team.

Now, I don't think being on a loser will hurt Kyrie's median stardom. He is what he is because of how entertaining he is, mixed with how much he doesn't really care. It's almost like he rather be left alone and just have a cult following.

He's in a space where he's fun as shite to watch but nobody latches on to him(basically the opposite of a polarizing figure). Basically everyone agrees that he's neat to watch but he doesn't move the needle because he noticeably doesn't even really care himself.
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46191 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:46 pm to
So you just completely ignored my last post and didn't read it at all before responding to it.

I'll stop here...
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:47 pm to
Everybody negotiating for Kyrie should offer peanuts and hang up when the Cavs balk. The Cavs have zero leverage. They can either enter the season with a completely dysfunctional/cancerous locker room, or they can take under market value for Kyrie if I'm a GM talking to them.

ETA: Like if I'm Phoenix, I'd offer nothing more than Bledsoe and Dudley straight up. If they balk, hang up. They'll call you back eventually.
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 5:49 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112329 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:48 pm to
You're talking out of both sides of you mouth. You're saying Kyrie isn't on kobes level, yet you continue to argue that Kyrie can continue his off the court success without being on a winning team because Kobe did it

Do you believe because Kobe did it that anyone can do it?
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:48 pm to
At this point in their careers give me Love over Melo


Love is way better than the stats show. He has been asked to be a rich mans Ryan Anderson on the Cavs. If Kyrie goes you could see him put up 24/11
Posted by philabuck
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2008
10379 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

The Cavs have zero leverage. They can either enter the season with a completely dysfunctional/cancerous locker room


Like the year and a half with Blatt? I think you're over valuing the amount of fricks the Cavs have to give. Some team will cave before the trade deadline and the Cavs will get a nice return.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Kyrie can continue his off the court success without being on a winning team because Kobe did it
And the whole Kobe "losing" narrative is ridiculous anyways. Before his last 3 years, post-Shaq, they only had one losing season and that was the only time they didn't make the playoffs.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram