Started By
Message

Pierre Garcon files lawsuit against FanDuel

Posted on 10/30/15 at 5:34 pm
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57447 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 5:34 pm
LINK

quote:

FanDuel, the daily fantasy sports site worth over $1 billion, was just hit with a proposed class action lawsuit by Pierre Garcon, a wide receiver for the Washington Redskins, who's seeking to represent all NFL players. The complaint basically accuses FanDuel of running a business and making money while using player names and likenesses without proper authorization. It's likely FanDuel has an agreement with the NFL and other sports leagues to use its content, but this lawsuit alleges the daily fantasy sports site hasn't signed any deals with the NFL players association for using player likenesses.


quote:

"I am bringing this lawsuit against FanDuel for using my name, image, and likeness in both daily fantasy contests and through advertising on TV ads and infomercials. FanDuel has taken the liberty to engaged in these actions without my consent and without proper licensing rights. As a result of these activities, FanDuel daily fantasy contests have shown increasing revenues leading to large profits. Therefore, on behalf of myself as well as any other players who are being treated unjustly, I chose to file a complaint.


If the NFL and ESPN back the site, will he have a realistic chance of winning?
This post was edited on 10/30/15 at 5:37 pm
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52746 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 5:35 pm to
I hope this kills those incessant commercials.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

I hope this kills those incessant commercials.

Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
15845 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 5:37 pm to
Good. They should get their cut. Just like with the video games.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 5:43 pm to
I know that there are differences, but using similar logic, shouldn't boxers--or any individual sport athlete--be able to sue for sport betting?
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30818 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 5:45 pm to
Good God, Pierre must know his time is coming to an end and hasn't saved wisely. What a tool.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
21958 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 5:53 pm to
This got alllllooooottt more interesting...
Posted by JG77056
Vegas baby, Vegas
Member since Sep 2010
12060 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:01 pm to
The NFL has a deal with Draftkings, not Fanduel. That's why the lawsuit is just against Fanduel.
Posted by VAvolfan
Member since Feb 2010
2326 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:08 pm to
Isn't he playing for an organization that profits using a whole group of peoples likeness as a mascot without their consent? Bit ironic.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:15 pm to
If this case had any legs, wouldn't the NFLPA be on this and not just PG?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110684 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

Good. They should get their cut. Just like with the video games
Wtf
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41158 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

The NFL has a deal with Draftkings, not Fanduel. That's why the lawsuit is just against Fanduel.


you don't shite where you eat, Jerry Jones is an owner of Draftkings
Posted by aVatiger
Water
Member since Jan 2006
27967 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:27 pm to
In FanDuels defense, Pierre's image is used minimally at best.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:36 pm to
lol who puts garcon in their lineup..

Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52746 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:40 pm to
I do every Sunday in my 30-team league.
Posted by TTownTiger
Austin
Member since Oct 2007
5301 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

FanDuel has taken the liberty to engaged in these actions without my consent and without proper licensing rights.


I can't see how this is accurate considering he was promoting Fanduel contests on his twitter account last season. Wouldn't that be a form of consent?
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
25508 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 7:59 pm to
So don't use pictures. Then does fanduel get sued for using his name? The players don't 'own' their stats. I am so tired of these guys bitching about this shite.
Posted by stlslick
St.Louis,Mo
Member since Nov 2012
14054 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Isn't he playing for an organization that profits using a whole group of peoples likeness as a mascot without their consent? Bit ironic.


yeah, those bears, eagles, tigers, etc aren't getting paid either. their likeness being used al laround the country.

f'in humans bears and tigers gotta eat
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30164 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 8:04 pm to
NFL players whine about everything.

Nobody is using Garcon's likeness anyway. He blows.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
13912 posts
Posted on 10/30/15 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

If the NFL and ESPN back the site, will he have a realistic chance of winning?
The NFL isn't exactly batting the best legal average of late.

Kudos if FanDuel can scrap together counsel fees after all the annoying advertising they've been buying. That alone makes me want this suit to be successful.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram