Started By
Message

re: Official NBA Finals call, who you got?

Posted on 6/2/16 at 8:54 am to
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
20685 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 8:54 am to
Cavs in 3.
Posted by OneFifty
No favorite team now
Member since Aug 2012
3872 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 8:56 am to
GS in 7
Or
Possibly Cavs in 7 (if dray-dray gets another flagrant and is suspended)

Either way, I am actually excited for this series. Two best teams, two best players. Could not ask for much more. I really believe Lue and Kerr are going to have to show their mettle for their teams to win this series.
Posted by Gary Busey
Member since Dec 2014
33277 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 9:01 am to
Cavs win in game 7 on an improbable finish.
Posted by longhorn22
Nicholls St. Fan
Member since Jan 2007
42292 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:13 am to
Cavs in 6...nothings changed in GS and the Cavs almost won last year with 1 player...now they tooled their team to play that style and they are healthy with getting Kyrie and Love back. Advantage CAVS, in a big way!

GM 1 - Cavs
GM 2 - Warriors (blowout)
Gm 3 - Cavs
Gm 4 - Cavs
Gm 5 - Warriors (blowout)
Gm 6 - Cavs
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Warriors in 7 but Cavs steal one tonight
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Cavs in 7


They won't win game 7 at Oracle.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110856 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Official NBA Finals call
I don't think it is.
Posted by NFLU
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2014
5776 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:33 am to
Cavs will sweep.

But really, Cavs in 7.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 10:34 am
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82030 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Cavs almost won last year with 1 player..
can you stop with this fricking line?
Posted by longhorn22
Nicholls St. Fan
Member since Jan 2007
42292 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:48 am to
is it not true?

Numbers don't lie....
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110856 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:50 am to
quote:

is it not true?
It's certainly not true.

They were never the betting favorites.

GS won twice as many games, a 6 game series is not a series that the losing team "almost won"
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 10:51 am
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53359 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:50 am to
The argument is that Cleveland played grindball with a better defensive unit on the floor than they will have this year. The PnR thread said it best.

quote:

The author questions whether Love and Irving will be a net positive for the Cavs given their issues with defense and scoring against the Warriors.


That is the essence of the series, and hopefully it will all be put to rest either way.
Posted by wheelz007
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2010
3364 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:17 pm to
I think this one is tough to call.

There is no denying the greatness of the Warriors. They're legit.

There is also no denying the greatness of LeBron James.

But something tells me these Cavs are best-suited to beat Golden State... and that fatigue may become a factor. The Cavs are the better-rested team.

Cavs in 6?
Posted by suavecito80
Member since Apr 2014
2871 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:37 pm to
Warriors in six.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:48 pm to
CAVS SWEEP
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:59 pm to
Warriors in 5
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35237 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

The author questions whether Love and Irving will be a net positive for the Cavs given their issues with defense and scoring against the Warriors.
Which is pretty illogical. Sure, their defensive issues are a concern, BUT to pretend that they don't make up for it--and then some--in other aspects of the game, and add some much needed depth, is a bit overboard.

Of course, the article that questioned this net positive had a whole slew of incorrect statistics (like the Cavs shooting 21.6% from 3 for the last 7 games when their WORST performance was > 30%).
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 1:40 pm to
Warriors sweep in 5
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

hich is pretty illogical. Sure, their defensive issues are a concern, BUT to pretend that they don't make up for it--and then some--in other aspects of the game, and add some much needed depth, is a bit overboard.

Of course, the article that questioned this net positive had a whole slew of incorrect statistics (like the Cavs shooting 21.6% from 3 for the last 7 games when their WORST performance was > 30%).



They will have worse defensive output. They have had worse defensive output. It's just the causality of having two core pieces in the starting lineup that can't defend well along with your main piece off the bench

The question has always been can the Cavs make up for that by producing enough offensive output to overcome what will likely be an even more efficient and point heavy Warriors output this time around due to a more lax defense? The numbers don't really favor CLE in almost any categories except maybe rebounding. It's just what it is.

Cleveland has a chance but they are definitely under dogs. They need to get ridiculous output from Lebron, Kyrie and Love and from shooters to hang. Or they need to try and concede Love a lot and slow things down and use Lebron's gravity to hopefully free up Irving and shooters. Then use a possible rebounding advantage to win the offensive glass and get more possessions.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 1:50 pm
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

The question has always been can the Cavs make up for that by producing enough offensive output to overcome what will likely be an even more efficient and point heavy Warriors output this time around? The numbers don't really favor CLE in almost any categories except maybe rebounding. It's just what it is.


Kyrie/Love (mostly Love) have not demonstrated the type of consistency offensively that would give me extreme confidence that they can pull this off.

I'm mostly hoping to see them raise their level of play and keep it there for an entire series. If I'm being honest I have not seen them string together enough consecutive excellent performances that they would need to beat GS. It's a tall order to do it against the best team in the league. They have no margin for error.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram