Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

NCAA Bracket or Mock NFL Draft (What's easier)

Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:38 pm
Posted by Loungefly85
Lafayette
Member since Jul 2016
7930 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:38 pm
Got into a discussion with a co-worker at lunch. He says a mock draft is easier to predict with 100% accuracy than a march madness bracket.

I told him he was being ridiculous. I mean, he is, right?
This post was edited on 2/16/17 at 2:40 pm
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38378 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:41 pm to
A draft would be much easier to predict under the premise of no trades.

The odds of a perfect bracket are roughly 1 in 128 billion. With a B

In the draft you can look at the coaches/management trends paired with the teams weaknesses and narrow it down to 2 or 3 guys.


ETA: my brain read this as first round. Obviously predicting an entire draft is impossible
This post was edited on 2/16/17 at 2:44 pm
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8317 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:46 pm to
NCAA Bracket would be easier. The draft has people from all over the world and anyone could be drafted at any point in time. There is a set number of teams for the NCAA Bracket.

Now if you were to say you had to pick the bracket correctly from the beginning of the season, before any games had been played, that might be more difficult.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23121 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Got into a discussion with a co-worker at lunch. He says a mock draft is easier to predict with 100% accuracy than a march madness bracket.

I told him he was being ridiculous. I mean, he is, right?


I guess. I think once you get to the third round of the NFL draft it turns impossible.

You can get pretty good feels for the first two rounds. Once the third round hits, some teams are reaching for guys they know they want but may not be available in 25 picks or taking a chance on a guy with a weed problem/injury bug
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:59 pm to
If by mock draft you mean the first round, then I'd say chances are better to get 30 something picks 100% correct than to get 60 something picks 100% correct. However, it's easier to get a high accuracy with the tourney than the draft.
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5071 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 3:53 pm to
Considering the number of Juniors that declare for the draft and go undrafted, predicting the draft is a lot harder. Trades alone make it impossible.
Posted by el duderino III
People's Republic of Austin
Member since Jul 2011
2383 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 5:26 pm to
in terms of probability, the bracket, and it's not even close. Each game in a bracket only has two possible outcomes. all 256 picks in the draft have dozens of potential options, fewer in the early rounds yes but in the later rounds the number balloons.

so if you want to take an estimate, you could say that on average, each team picking has 30 viable options. That's 30^256 possible outcomes (it's slightly less as you can't pick a player twice, but for estimates sake)

that's 1.39 with 376 zeroes behind it
This post was edited on 2/16/17 at 5:30 pm
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40534 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 6:53 pm to
A bracket is thousands of times easier than a first round 100% correct based on sheer probability. But that doesn't consider the fact each draft pick is a human decision, so with inside intelligence, that's much easier.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram