- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jameis Winston admits to NCAA violation on Draft Academy (national TV)
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:33 am to lsupride87
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:33 am to lsupride87
quote:
and then the cops grabbed you, 100% hey wouldn't charge you with stealing
Yeah okay
0
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:35 am to lsupride87
quote:
If someone in wal mart told you that you could have the Xbox for free, and then plain as day you walked out with it, and then the cops grabbed you, 100% hey wouldn't charge you with stealing. They would take possession of the goods but you yourself are not going to be charged with stealing
why don't you try this after work and see what happens. Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:36 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
The one that couldn't even be proven in kangaroo court
The one that's featured in a movie about Campus Rape that aired at LSU last night and the one that is part of a civil lawsuit against him.
And the 2nd girl who claims he raped her as well.
The crab legs are not the elephant in the room.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:38 am to The Pirate King
How can I try it after work? You know place where wal mart employees are giving things away for free?
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:48 am to lsupride87
quote:
I don't think it is stealing unless you are in on it. The employee is an extension of the company. If they offer a customer a free good it is not on the customer to say no. If your waiter comps your appetizer you do not need to go and ask the manager/owner in order to not be stealing
You don't see the distinction? There is an obvious difference between a nice waiter being like "I went ahead and got you _____, it's on the house" and "you can eat for free whenever you come in, bruh"
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:50 am to lsupride87
It's not the employee's to give away. What don't you understand about that? It's owned by the company. It's up to the person to know better. The law doesn't allow ignorance as an excuse. Also do you know how often thieves use the excuse "someone said I could have it" when they get caught?
The principle is still the same whether the person said you could have it or not. The cops would view it the same way.
The principle is still the same whether the person said you could have it or not. The cops would view it the same way.
This post was edited on 4/22/15 at 8:51 am
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:50 am to Pettifogger
Auburn fans are still butthurt after Winston went in dry on them in the title game.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:52 am to Pettifogger
quote:Of course I see the difference. But in the eyes of the law they will go after the employee. An employee is an extension of your company. If one of them offers free goods in a customer in any capacity it is not on the customer to ask the owner if they had the power to do so. If in fact they were not granted the capacity to give such goods the owner will have recourse against the employee, not the customer. I don't understand how this isn't clear as day. Now, if you convince a friend of yours to take store goods and give them to you, then I see the owner having recourse over both parties
You don't see the distinction? There is an obvious difference between a nice waiter being like "I went ahead and got you _____, it's on the house" and "you can eat for free whenever you come in, bruh"
Posted on 4/22/15 at 8:56 am to TTsTowel
Jameis is just continuing that FSU tradition of guys like Peter Warrick and Lavernious Coles.
Free Shoes University
Free Shoes University
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:03 am to The Pirate King
quote:Not it isnt. Not at all. The company is responsible for its employees, and the employees are the extension of the company. It is not on the customer when they are offered free goods by an employee
It's not the employee's to give away. What don't you understand about that? It's owned by the company. It's up to the person to know better.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:20 am to TTsTowel
He also stole Auburn national title.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:27 am to baybeefeetz
Why even bring that up
He should have taken high road and not even discussed it
He should have taken high road and not even discussed it
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:29 am to harry coleman beast
quote:
Any chance he owns up to the rapes he committed?
what evidence do you have that he committed rape or is this just an internet quip?
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:32 am to The Pirate King
quote:
t's not the employee's to give away. What don't you understand about that? It's owned by the company. It's up to the person to know better
you've never gotten anything comp by a retail outlet? A meal, a drink a hotel room? Was it put up to the board to approve or did some employee give it too you? If the employee gave you say a free beer that he wasn't supposed to are you a "thief'?
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:34 am to H-Town Tiger
I wonder how many star athletes get this kind of treatment.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:35 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:Yeh I dont see how people dont get this. Would he have to give the food back? Yes. But the recourse of the owner/law is on the employee who did not have the capacity to give away those items
you've never gotten anything comp by a retail outlet? A meal, a drink a hotel room? Was it put up to the board to approve or did some employee give it too you? If the employee gave you say a free beer that he wasn't supposed to are you a "thief'?
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:36 am to Buttermilk Pancakes
quote:
He also stole Auburn national title.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:39 am to lsupride87
quote:
Would he have to give the food back? Yes.
I disagree unless he was "working" with the employee or something. I know a bartender that got fired for giving away too much, you can't hold the customers responsible if they didn't know.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:39 am to lsupride87
quote:I don't think it's that black and white. Depending on the circumstances, the law can charge the person who received the stolen goods.
But the recourse of the owner/law is on the employee who did not have the capacity to give away those items
This post was edited on 4/22/15 at 9:40 am
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:41 am to boom roasted
quote:Yes, if the person was in on it. Meaning it was someone they knew and they had setup this system while knowing it was illegal. But if an athlete is told he doesnt have to pay somewhere I dont see the illegality on his end
Depending on the circumstances, the law can charge the person who received the stolen goods.
This post was edited on 4/22/15 at 9:43 am
Page 4 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News