Started By
Message

re: Is jimmy graham a tight end or wide out?

Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:34 pm to
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6371 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

So, the fact that he lines up at TE at all, let alone 1/3 of the time, pretty much makes him a TE.


Except that in the franchise tag situation, there has to be some defining factor. While most hypothetical examples seem extreme they serve a purpose. Graham represents an evolution in the game, and pay structure will have to evolve to fit it.

He may be classified as a TE by the team, and he may line up at TE occasionally. But when it comes to his contract, he should be compensated according to his production. He produces like a WR so he should be paid like one.

If the Saints are allowed to continue paying him like a TE, then what stops teams from designating high dollar players as lower paying positions?
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14960 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

So, instead of being a TE that lines up wide more often than most TEs, he's the only WR in the league that ever lines up on the line, with his hand on the ground.



And an even better one that I didn't think about. No defensive lineman in the league attempts PAT or FG, with the exception of Suh. Either Suh is the only DL in the league who has also has coincidentally kicked the ball, or he is a kicker, by your argument.



ETA- in both cases, you're actually talking about two very unique players that fill voids. The voids they have filled are K and TE, being that they are a DL and WR.
This post was edited on 1/29/14 at 1:42 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

And an even better one that I didn't think about. No defensive lineman in the league attempts PAT or FG, with the exception of Suh. Either Suh is the only DL in the league who has also has coincidentally kicked the ball, or he is a kicker, by your argument.


What is Suh's % of total snaps at each position?

99.9% is on the line, hence he's a DT.

And the Tebow example is debunked because of only playing around 40 snaps for the whole year.



Plus only Jesus would give Tebow the franchise tag.
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
18960 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Either Suh is the only DL in the league who has also has coincidentally kicked the ball, or he is a kicker, by your argument.

"Coincidentally" is a big word in the above statement.

Does Suh spend 1/3 of his time on the field kicking?

Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14960 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Does Suh spend 1/3 of his time on the field kicking?


No. What number then, do you propose, is the number of snaps a skill player should play at one position to receive that designation?



ETA- question is to you, too, KosmoCramer.
This post was edited on 1/29/14 at 1:57 pm
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:57 pm to
If a player spends 66% of his time at DE and 33% of his time at OLB, what would you classify him as?
Posted by LSU Piston
The 313
Member since Feb 2008
3844 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

If a player spends 66% of his time at DE and 33% of his time at OLB, what would you classify him as?


THIS.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:04 pm to
You take the average amount of time lined up at both positions, and multiply it by the average of the top 5 players at those positions and that is the franchise tag amount.

If I were a Saints fan, I'd be livid if I found out they were lining him up at TE solely because of money reasons. I don't buy that for a second, but if true, HOLY frick I'd be livid as a fan.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56470 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:06 pm to
He is a TE. People are just struggling with the slowly changing role of a TE in the NFL. TEs have always split out wide. They just do so more now than they used to.

And, over time, their values will rise above what TEs were traditionally worth. Gronkowski's last contract set a new bar for TEs. Grahams will probably do the same.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:06 pm to
SO for instance say he play 60% of his snaps at WR - and the average of the top 5 WRs is 14 million.

He played 40% of his snaps at TE and the average for top TEs is 8 Million.

.4 x 8 Million = 3.2 million
.6 x 14 Million = 8.4 million

His tag price should be 11.6 Million.


Simple as that.



Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

His tag price should be 11.6 Million.


Simple as that.

Get this common sense shite out of here.
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38121 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:08 pm to
Anyone who wants to call him a WR, that's fine...you can call him whatever you want. Just prepare to be made fun of when you call him a WR to someone in real life. People will assume you are on par with a girl as far as knowledge about sports.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

And, over time, their values will rise above what TEs were traditionally worth.


Which makes the franchise tag unfair, hence the adapting of the rule. When the game evolves, positions and player types gain and lose value.

With the spread, athletic TEs are very valuable and should be paid as such. The best way to do that is to look at how they are used and pay them on that ratio in the franchise tag scenario.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Anyone who wants to call him a WR, that's fine...you can call him whatever you want. Just prepare to be made fun of when you call him a WR to someone in real life. People will assume you are on par with a girl as far as knowledge about sports.


This isn't a black and white issue, and I can actually articulate my position rather than go to ad hominem attacks on my masculinity.

But continue on.
Posted by LSU Piston
The 313
Member since Feb 2008
3844 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Anyone who wants to call him a WR, that's fine...you can call him whatever you want. Just prepare to be made fun of when you call him a WR to someone in real life. People will assume you are on par with a girl as far as knowledge about sports.




Ok slick.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Anyone who wants to call him a WR, that's fine...you can call him whatever you want. Just prepare to be made fun of when you call him a WR to someone in real life. People will assume you are on par with a girl as far as knowledge about sports.

Luckily anyone with basic reasoning skills can understand the argument.
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11279 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Except that in the franchise tag situation, there has to be some defining factor. While most hypothetical examples seem extreme they serve a purpose. Graham represents an evolution in the game, and pay structure will have to evolve to fit it.

He may be classified as a TE by the team, and he may line up at TE occasionally. But when it comes to his contract, he should be compensated according to his production. He produces like a WR so he should be paid like one.

If the Saints are allowed to continue paying him like a TE, then what stops teams from designating high dollar players as lower paying positions?



easy, in this case the tight end position is changing. who do you think he has more in common with day to day, and play to play: gronk, vernon davis, jared cook or calvin johnson, larry fitz, and mike wallace.

that his hand is on the ground 1/3 of the plays would be completely bizarre for anybody at the WR position, but generally speaking is completely normal for the top 5-10 tight ends. he accepts his pro bowl award at the TE position, sits with the TE in meetings, and has regularly described himself as a TE and actively chased records for the TE position. its not like they are trying to call him a full back here. the guy is a TE and if the Tight end pay scale is behind WRs, so be it.
This post was edited on 1/29/14 at 2:21 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

the guy is a TE and if the Tight end pay scale is behind WRs, so be it.


That's a great way to alienate a player. Unfairly using archaic pay scale to frick him on salary AND not give him an extended deal.

He will hold out, and rightfully so.


And to the person that said they will just find another basketballer and train him to be the next Jimmy Graham



I don't even know...
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11279 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

With the spread, athletic TEs are very valuable and should be paid as such. The best way to do that is to look at how they are used and pay them on that ratio in the franchise tag scenario.


and as TE salaries organically go up, which they are, the tag will follow. thats the beauty of a system based off the existing contracts. it changes with the game.

unless you are arguing that guys like gronk and vernon davis who signed contracts being factored into the top 5 somehow dont represent his position fairly.
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17099 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:25 pm to
quote:



This isn't a black and white issue, and I can actually articulate my position rather than go to ad hominem attacks on my masculinity.


No way, bro...u think Graham is a WR, u gay.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram