Started By
Message

How's this for an 8-team playoff set up?

Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:26 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65082 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:26 pm
1. Reduce the regular season to 10 or 11 games with a 9-game conference schedule.

2. Every Power 5 Conference must have a conference championship game.

3. The Power 5 champs have an auto-bid into the playoffs.

4. The remaining 3 slots will be given to the highest ranked at-large teams.

5. The first round will be played in the home stadiums of the top 4 seeds.

6. The semi-finals will rotate among the major bowls (like it is now).

7. The championship game will be bid on for a host city (like it is now).
Posted by BACONisMEATcandy
Member since Dec 2007
46643 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:27 pm to
sounds great... won't happen anytime soon though
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:28 pm to
I'd rather get rid of conference championship games than make them mandatory


ETA: I should say that with the current system I'm not a fan of conference championship games. With your proposal, it might be necessary to determine a conference champion since not every team plays each other.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 12:32 pm
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
20258 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:30 pm to
6 will be less controversial IMO.

1. Pick your power 5 conference champions.

2. Make everyone play a conference championship

3. 6th team is a wildcard. Can come from power 5 conference or teams like Boise.

4. Top 2 teams get bye weeks. First 2 games played at neutral sites. The week after conference championship weekend.

5. Go from there to the current rotation.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64206 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 12:59 pm to
No more than 4 needed. We don't need more teams in. Reward greatness during the season as opposed to one team getting really hot late. If you really want to shake things up eliminate divisions, eliminate cupcake games, and simply have more conference games each year. Then have the actual top 2 in each conference play one another in conf champ games.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 1:03 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76519 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

4. Top 2 teams get bye weeks. First 2 games played at neutral sites. The week after conference championship weekend.


This should never happen. The line between the 2nd and 3rd best teams isn't that great that they should be rewarded to heavily. Very unfair.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65082 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

No more than 4 needed.


Tell that to TCU. Co-champs of the Big 12, #3 in the nation going into the final week of the season, and then left out after winning 55-3 in their final game.

We saw the wisdom of that action when TCU rocked Ole Miss to the tune of 42-3.

Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76519 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Tell that to TCU. Co-champs of the Big 12, #3 in the nation going into the final week of the season, and then left out after winning 55-3 in their final game.

We saw the wisdom of that action when TCU rocked Ole Miss to the tune of 42-3.


Then they should have won all their games. And their conference should have played an extra one.
Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
75431 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

6 will be less controversial IMO.

1. Pick your power 5 conference champions.

2. Make everyone play a conference championship

3. 6th team is a wildcard. Can come from power 5 conference or teams like Boise.

4. Top 2 teams get bye weeks. First 2 games played at neutral sites. The week after conference championship weekend.

5. Go from there to the current rotation.



I've gone back and forth vs 6/8, but this isn't too bad.

But then, what if your conference champ is a team like WISC in 2012 (where PSU/OSU were banned from postseason play). Would there be some W/L Requirment? Just curious.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64206 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:07 pm to
Again, read my post. If we eliminate all the fluff each season and actually have each conference have a uniform system where the top 2 are vying for their conference we have a defacto playoff within the context of the season. Adding unnecessary amounts of unworthy playoff teams makes it more of a grind/system of attrition for the truly worthy teams.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 1:10 pm
Posted by sassyLSU
Lake Charles, La.
Member since May 2011
2080 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:09 pm to
I would give an option.
If you see you have no shot at being in the championship you can play 12 games and have home games vs a "AA" and a C-USA.

If you want to be in the mix for the playoffs, you only schedule 10 games that year. Those ten games must be against D-1-A opponents.


This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 1:11 pm
Posted by Tiger Nation 84
Member since Dec 2011
36517 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:09 pm to
This is the setup I have been saying myself. The one time in my life that I agree with a Bama fan about something.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76519 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

I would give an option.
If you see you have no shot at being in the championship you can play 12 games and have home games vs a "AA" and a C-USA.

If you want to be in the mix for the playoffs, you only schedule 10 games that year.



That's dumb as frick.
Posted by sassyLSU
Lake Charles, La.
Member since May 2011
2080 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:12 pm to
Kosmo

AD's at Purdue and Vandy are not giving up that revenue.

Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76519 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

AD's at Purdue and Vandy are not giving up a chance to win a conference or national title and disenchant their boosters


fify
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
7629 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:15 pm to
There would be fewer complaints after a move to 8 than having to hear how 6 still isn't enough. IMO fans of 6 should just go with it and make the "peoples voice" if you will sound more unified. 3 at large/wild card bids is reasonable
Posted by Tigersport2014
Member since Aug 2014
824 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:16 pm to
I would add :

8. Alabama is not allowed in
Posted by BoogerEater
Lake Charles, La.
Member since Feb 2008
1597 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:24 pm to
Should have stuck with BCS for rankings and let the top whatever play for it. You left out sucks for you.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76519 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Should have stuck with BCS for rankings and let the top whatever play for it. You left out sucks for you.


The top 4 BCS teams made the playoffs this year.
Posted by Horsemeat
Truckin' somewhere in the US
Member since Dec 2014
13527 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:40 pm to
I say we expand division 1A to 128 teams and have just one long fricking bracket for a season. We could even have it double or triple elimination. Let the AP make the preseason poll count by ranking 1-128 and let 'em have at it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram